all 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 72 points 1 week ago* (17 children)

If we didn't have RAM in our phones and PC's, how would we use the data centers?
It's almost as if Sam Altman is a moron.
Also a lot of the hardware for data centers is just laying around unused, because the data centers aren't even built.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 week ago (12 children)

    He’s referring specifically to local RAM used to run local AI models, whichl he argues is unused most of time. Say if you use your local AI for 4 hours a day, it’s idle for 20. Where the same model in a cloud might serve users across time zones 24/7.

    It’s a similar argument about private car ownership, where a car might be used 5% of the day for a lot of people while 95% of the time it requires storage space, aka a parking spot somewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    The argument makes sebse for some things but not for others.

    Take water bottles. Or mugs. Having 15 of them collecting dust in a drawer is suboptimal. Therefore no one should own one and rent it from a muglord.

    There's a balance to be found, and I'd say RAM is more of a commodity than cars are. The fact it's not 99.999% utilized, unlike a certain someone's wishes is a feature of life and not a bug of capitalism not yet being post late stage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago

    You can’t just have RAM sitting idle in your PC, you peasant. You use it, when you’re done with your pc, you take that RAM and give it to Sam. Next time you go buy another RAM and turn on your pc. Rinse and repeat. That didn’t make sense? Yeah, that’s how Sam’s argument sounded to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    The RAM on your computer or phone has a limited number of cycles in its life. No one would want their car be driven while they aren't using it, or strangers in their home while they are away. So Sam Altman can fuck off if he thinks he is entitled to use the processing in my phone or computer while I'm not using them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    Um, I would absolutely let people drive my car if it was guaranteed to be back before I needed it? What?

    The difference is that OpenAI isn't offering a benevolent cooperative where they share the value evenly, they're trying to corner the market to extract maximum profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    OK thanks for the explanation. Still having it not used at all, because the data center isn't build yet is worse. Also calling it "everybody" is weird. Unless he means phone and PC, and the very specialized AI run on such systems do not require extra RAM.
    So he remains a selfish moron.
    Companies running their own decentralized AI models on their own servers are the competition. Whining about the competition is also moronic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    Yes, memory prices are affecting a lot more than people who want to run local models on high-memory desktops. That’s a small minority compared to all computer uses affected by the memory prices.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    That argument does make some sense but of course he’s making it purely out of self-interest. It would be interesting to have some kind of open-source distributed system where you can share your compute when you’re not using it. But that’s not what he’s proposing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago

    local RAM used to run local AI models, whichl he argues is unused most of time

    Cue in that interview from Nadella saying he has unused GPUs because they haven't got datacenters to put them in. Maybe Altman should give him a call about his unused RAM...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 week ago

    It's also a shame that he gets some of the air we all need, but here we are.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 week ago

    "Don't think too hard. Give me all the money, all the GPUs, all the RAM. Or else, you risk angering all-powerful AI." Everytime, I think I have failed in life, I just think about the tech-bros CEOs and I get a semblence of peace that I maybe a failure, but in the current tech world, this is what success is like, being in a cult, all mental faculties turned off.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    Holy fuck he's already at Musk levels of delusional narcissism.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago

    Internet CEO Me says its "terrible to have datacenters have a bunch of the world's limited supply of DRAM" instead of shoving it all to everybody

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Is this because he's one of those techno cult weirdos that thinks it's ethically wrong to do anything to impede ai progress because it'll anger the future omnipotent/omniscient general ai entity we create and they'll destroy us?

    It's probably just because "we want all the money, you shouldn't have any". But even if it's the first thing it's mighty convenient that that view benefits him financially

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    I think this argument would make more sense if data centers were nationalized. Not saying thats a good idea either, but the me vs you argument is much less powerful than me vs us.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago

    Oh fuck you buddy

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    He might have something resembling a point if he were running a nonprofit.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    What's everyones bets on the cult or business being more in charge of these statements?

    Is it just "imagine how much money I'd make if I alone was allowed to own this?" or is there a little "Only the god we make in our data centers should exist." too.

    One of humanity's biggest op either way

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    Out of curiosity, how does this tie into the whole "AI might destroy humanity" thing?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago

    Makes sense. Everyone is only thinking about themselves while Sam sees the big picture, himself.

  • source
  • 75 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    5 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post