you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 1 week ago (12 children)

He’s referring specifically to local RAM used to run local AI models, whichl he argues is unused most of time. Say if you use your local AI for 4 hours a day, it’s idle for 20. Where the same model in a cloud might serve users across time zones 24/7.

It’s a similar argument about private car ownership, where a car might be used 5% of the day for a lot of people while 95% of the time it requires storage space, aka a parking spot somewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    The argument makes sebse for some things but not for others.

    Take water bottles. Or mugs. Having 15 of them collecting dust in a drawer is suboptimal. Therefore no one should own one and rent it from a muglord.

    There's a balance to be found, and I'd say RAM is more of a commodity than cars are. The fact it's not 99.999% utilized, unlike a certain someone's wishes is a feature of life and not a bug of capitalism not yet being post late stage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago

    You can’t just have RAM sitting idle in your PC, you peasant. You use it, when you’re done with your pc, you take that RAM and give it to Sam. Next time you go buy another RAM and turn on your pc. Rinse and repeat. That didn’t make sense? Yeah, that’s how Sam’s argument sounded to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    The RAM on your computer or phone has a limited number of cycles in its life. No one would want their car be driven while they aren't using it, or strangers in their home while they are away. So Sam Altman can fuck off if he thinks he is entitled to use the processing in my phone or computer while I'm not using them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    Um, I would absolutely let people drive my car if it was guaranteed to be back before I needed it? What?

    The difference is that OpenAI isn't offering a benevolent cooperative where they share the value evenly, they're trying to corner the market to extract maximum profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    That argument does make some sense but of course he’s making it purely out of self-interest. It would be interesting to have some kind of open-source distributed system where you can share your compute when you’re not using it. But that’s not what he’s proposing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    OK thanks for the explanation. Still having it not used at all, because the data center isn't build yet is worse. Also calling it "everybody" is weird. Unless he means phone and PC, and the very specialized AI run on such systems do not require extra RAM.
    So he remains a selfish moron.
    Companies running their own decentralized AI models on their own servers are the competition. Whining about the competition is also moronic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    Yes, memory prices are affecting a lot more than people who want to run local models on high-memory desktops. That’s a small minority compared to all computer uses affected by the memory prices.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    local RAM used to run local AI models, whichl he argues is unused most of time

    Cue in that interview from Nadella saying he has unused GPUs because they haven't got datacenters to put them in. Maybe Altman should give him a call about his unused RAM...

  • source
  • parent