The fuck is a beardo?
post
Is part of Hegseth's mental health problems that he can't grow a beard. It wouldn't be the first time in history (Alexander the Great famously count grow a beard and forced his troops to be clean-shaved).
From my understanding, it's to keep black people from serving. They have to be clean shaven and unfortunately black people tend to get really bad razor bumps which isn't accepted.
It's also about gas masks, can't from a seal with a beard.
That's the excuse, and the logic appears to make sense, but I think I recall it being tested and not really being much of a factor. That's what makes it a good dog whistle though. People will rush to say "it makes them unfit for duty because the equipment won't function" without looking further, so then the racist policies get protected and they don't have to actually justify the racism.
https://taskandpurpose.com/news/military-beards-break-gas-mask-seal/
Lack of evidence is not evidence of absence, just because a study hasn't been conducted does not mean beards don't interfere with wearing a gas mask.
Not having a jaw would probabry affect it too but there's no studies on that, yet nobody would claim it wouldn't
I've seen it tested, and it doesn't really. I have no idea if there's studies on that but, like you said, there isn't evidence, so why would we have this restriction? If they actually cared about this reasoning, they'd put money into testing it. However, disproving it would remove their ability to use it to justify exclusion, if this is the reason instead of functionality.
Just think about it. If you put enough force on beard hairs they are pretty firmly against the skin. They don't push the gas mask away. There aren't really going to be any gaps. It just doesn't logically make sense if you consider it for more than a second.
I have a beard and it affected the seal and operation of a GP5 gas mask when I had to wear one, which is quite a feat if you've seen a GP5 mask
I'm not familiar with what the US is doing but politicians make retarded changes all the time knowing anything about what they are doing or how things work in the real world
it's to keep black people from serving
Sounds fake
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/09/hegseth-military-shave-waiver-black-troops/
Yeah, why would this white supremacist administration make racist policies?
This impacts at most 16300 troops, and there are 162000 black men in service. They're going to need a much better strategy to get the blacks out if it's racially motivated... Not to mention the 60000 black women unaffected by this
~10%? That’s a pretty solid fraction, certainly not bad when you still need to maintain plausible deniability.
https://taskandpurpose.com/news/military-beards-break-gas-mask-seal/
It's impossible to prove intent, but it is a policy of systemic racism. Intentional or not, it does have the effect of preventing black people from serving, or from being promoted.
It had to be difficult leading an army that's largely Greek and unable to grow a beard
I’ve said it before & I’ll say it again: Satire is nigh-impossible when reality is already this ridiculous.
Isn't war in 2026 mostly about logistics and maintenance and signal tech?
For every 1 masculine man man with epic guns surely there needs to be 10 or 20 other mild mannered technicians and cooks and geeks to pilot the drones and what not.
WE NEED HOTTIES WITH ROCKHARD ABS AND HARDER BONERS TO SLOBBER OVER 🤤 🇺🇸 🫡
"A soldier needs two things: a full belly and a pair of shoes." -some dude named Napoleon. I was going to put "an army marches on its stomach" but that was apparently Frederick the Great, even earlier than Napoleon. War has always been mostly about logistics.
Fun Napoleon fact: the three main protagonist generals (Napoleon, Wellington and Blucher) at the Battle of Waterloo all designed shoes (or had shoes named after them). Only Wellingtons and Bluchers are still really around today - history is written by the winners, after all.
In the 5th century BCE Sun Tzu was saying the same shit. Idiot nobles and political appointees think war is about glorious battles, great warriors, and just killing more of the other guys. But it's about making sure your side has supplies and theirs doesn't. It's about making sure your troops aren't thinking of running away and theirs are. It's about setting strategic goals and doing what it takes to achieve them.
Ironically, this is part of why the Confederacy failed so hard, but have most of the well known generals. The generals were absolutely trash at strategy. They were totally focused on winning glorious battles, and they sacrificed a significant number of troops getting them. Then, in the long term, they didn't have the ability to keep fighting like that. Their names are remembered for being these supposedly amazing generals (some of this is post-hoc to worship the Confederacy as a symbol for racism) while the union generals were out there winning the war with superior strategy. They were much more likely to retreat when it wasn't strategically advantageous, because they weren't stupid.
99% Invisible did a show on the Brannock Device (the big metal thing in shoe stores to measure your feet) and how important it was to the war effort. Well fitted shoes go a long way.
Sure but... no moreso than ever, surely. Soldiers don't march across countries any more.
Their methods of transport today require even more infrastructure to support.
I would say it's significantly worse now. Sure, the soldiers need slightly less food per unit of time, since they aren't wasting as much just walking, but now they have ammo that's consumed at a much faster rate, and they also have vehicles and generators that consume fuel, and so much else.
We've also gotten a lot better with logistics though. We pack things in cargo containers and things, which can be stacked and (off)loaded significantly faster. We also obviously have much faster transportation and production now too.
Logistics is more important than ever, but it's also significantly better managed and easier to track and handle.
Sure but the broader point is, how many manly man soldiers do we need compared to how many fatty woke LGBTIQ bearded drone pilots?
I suspect the demand for meatheads is less now than it ever was
Maybe we have all miss understood and he wants no LGBTIQ beacuse they are worth more, like 11 times thats why he cant have any!
Got this from an old onion clip lol
Absolutely. There's more of a need for backline work than ever before.
This is distractions, the real reason is that they want to purge anyone who would block illegal orders.
They are more concerned about the "enemy within" the country.
Because when you are losing a war, the sort of facial hair you have really matters. Reality doesn't back them up, so they have to go for crass appearance. Not "weak" my ass.
From memory the facial hair things isn't really about appearance but a way to kick poc out.
I don't understand how ? can you elaborate ?
edit someone explained here :
https://lemmy.world/comment/26110187
The facial hair thing started before they really let African people into the army as a way to ensure a good gas mask seal during WW1. I think it's a dumb rule enforced only for some amorphous idea of "discipline" nowadays, though.
specifically african americans, they are prone to pseudofolliculitis.

top 96 comments