I just don’t know what the FIFA Peace Prize means these days.
post
replies:
Probably gonna need to be updated soon.
replies:
That's just the ones directly. That's none attacked by paid proxy terrorist forces.
replies:
The real story here isn’t asshat Trump. It’s that the US can’t keep its hands to itself, and it’s been that way for decades. Trump is just the new boss. The next one will also attack various countries.
replies:
load more comments
(-1 replies)
There's a Joe in the George column
replies:
nO nEw WaRs!
The Yanks have always been war mongering pieces of shit.
replies:
Probably gonna add Canada, Mexico and Cuba to that list here soon. The old codger is getting desperate.
replies:
One of them is a Nobel Peace Prize winner.
replies:
I, for one, want to thank our glorious USA overlords, for not nuking any new countries this decade. And for not (again) financing terrorist in my country this decade (well, at least nothing got reported); nor black sites (this decade), and only manipulating our elections and financing far right parties. And making sure the "tech" giants keep exploiting us.
I am so lucky. /s
The most peaceful president everyone
Why is America not on this list? ICE are terrorists hell-bent on destroying America in trump’s name.
replies:
It’s kinda surreal that of this chart, every country that Trump and W bombed, Obama did too
replies:
Really puts the Yemen situation into high relief. We've been at war with them for over 20 years, but we keep pretending they attacked us out of the blue a few years ago.
replies:
This would be cooler if it had sources
replies:
Fake news. The fifa peace prize award winner would never do anything like this.
*kinetically attacked
Didn't Bill Clinton authoritize any strikes during 2000, or is 2000 excluded from the 21st century?
replies:
No need for nuance
I thought it would be bigger.
Yankistanis big mad about seeing the presidents they idolize are war mongering criminals.
replies:
Trump bombed Pakistan? When?
replies:
Btw, do the # of wars per quarter century increase?
It obvious that no is not even an option as answer for the obvious, damn.
What does it say about our current political environment that it isnt immediately clear to me if this graphic is being used to imply "both sides" or "trump bad"?
Why isn't the USA on the list?
Obviously, we just need to vote blue no matter who harder!
replies:
I wonder what our current path would be if the Nobel committee threw a peace trinket at trump a while back?
replies:
I have mixed feelings here. I'm not happy with us attacking a lot of places, BUT....... not ALL of it has been for totally "oil" reasons. But at the same time, for a long time I've argued that if we go in to "help" some places, it's funny how we don't genereally "help" places in, for example, Africa when you have people killing each other - THOSe people are FINE killing each other.
Or, I suppose, supporting Israel over Palestine and standing by as thousands and thousands are murdered.
I'm just saying, I guess, that not all of the shit the US has done has been for the wrong reason, but a lot of it has. But at the same time, we've done some things that others wanted to get done, but we went in and did it.
I'm..... look........ this sounds like I'm trying to defend the US, and I guess I am a little, but not very much, okay?
replies:
Venezuela is missing.
Also, If you count conflicts that the US either started or keep inflamed as either proxy wars or just to serve capitalist imperialism, the list is much longer. Palestine, Sudan, India/Pakistan (Kashmir), Myanmar, Russia/Ukraine and Congo come to mind immediately.
Also, how about economic warfare? Have to put Cuba and North Korea and every other country the US sanctions on there. After all, US sanctions have killed 38 million people in the last 50 years.
replies:
and all those reasons for trump is, whenever anything related to the epstein files were going to be released that month.
all 95 comments