Gas prices are still high, diesel is at a record high, and the reserve has shrunk more than 30% in six months. While the reserve held around 415 million barrels of oil in February, it now holds less than 285 million barrels of oil — lower than it has been since the early 1980s.

These rapid drawdowns of oil threaten the salt caverns' structure, says Samantha Gross, director of the energy security and climate initiative at the Brookings Institution, a nonpartisan policy think tank. As the reserves get lower and lower, the physical facilities can get degraded, Gross says: " You can damage them by pumping too much out of them."

all 58 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 70 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Exactly as I said at the beginning of the summer: they will burn the reserves until the election them immediately turn them off.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    It’s a win win for them. They either lose the election and stick the Dems with a fuel crisis, or win the election and finish their dictatorship.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    The trump administration has been waging war in Iran without the consent of Congress with procedural tricks and methods shot down by even trump's Supreme Court.

    Assuming a full control of Congress after the midterms, could Democrats respond by ignoring the Executive branch and negotiating directly with Iran to end the conflict (by starving out the Executive branch monetarily)? I imagine the Iranian government would be much more open to a path that ends the stupid trump manufactured conflict anyway. Iran would win by ending the conflict, and the Democratically controlled Congress would win by lowering fuel prices (with the restoration of petroleum transiting the Straight of Hormuz).

    Could this work?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    yeah he pretty much does not care about prices after the election so they are pumping out as much as possible to keep prices from skyrocketing.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I wonder why markets are betting against a new shortage tho.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    So I watch broadcast tv and there are so many buy gold commercials which makes me wonder what they have up their sleeve for that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Prices have already skyrocketed. They've doubled since he took office.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    thats with massive pumping from the reserves. The true height is at least double again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    When Trump took office this time around I was paying around $2.00 a gallon. Today it was 4.19. I don't know if I can afford much more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    oh wow. I can't remember the last time I saw two bucks a gallon. Im lucky though in that I have only begrudgingly had a car so don't use a whole lot. like gas going up is such a drop in the bucket vs other things. I can't not eat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago
    [–] 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    it's almost as if it would've been a good idea to figure out some alternate energy sources beforehand

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    MORE MORE MORE

    Let's collapse the oil energy system, so we can finally all be forced to transition to a cheaper, efficient, cleaner, and self-contained energy system like with solar.

    Thanks Donny for helping the renewable energy movement!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I mean.. maybe. I like clean energy, but people will starve too. I don't see Trump's government hopping on clean energy as a solution. They will blame and deflect. They will destroy all our national parks scavenging for resources. It will be bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    OR the Orange Stain will invade another country. Isn't the USA so gosh darn quirky!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    This is what I likely see happening.

    Canada is selling a large amount of their supplies to China and anyone else besides the U.S. right now due to tensions. Alberta already has a separatist movement that has been quietly invaded by bad actors from various U.S. organizations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    Republicans are expecting to lose and are going to blame all this fallout on the democrats who will be elected

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    And the average dumb American will fall for it and Trump will be elected president again in 2028 lol (yes, he will find a way around the 2 term limit law).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (7 children)

    Presidential term limits aren't a law, they're a constitutional amendment. And there really isn't a way for him to get around it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    He's also signed an executive order to end birthright citizenship, which is also a constitutional amendment. Currently with the courts to see who wins.

    He's spent and redirected funds without congressional approval, in violation of article 1.

    He's ignored the 4th and 5th amendments by deporting people without due process.

    He's in stark violation of the emoluments clause.

    He's started and continued to wage war against Iran without congressional approval, in violation of article II.

    He's banned news organisations from the white house, likely in violation of the 1st amendment.

    What makes you think that he'll suddenly pay attention to the 22nd amendment, limiting him to two terms ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    It's not like he pays attention to anything in the Constitution anyway ...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    He doesn't get a choice in the matter, sweetie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    And who or what exactly is going to stop him?

    When no one (who is in a position to enforce) cares what is legal or constitutional, he can do anything he wants. Just look at the current state of the US and tell me anyone in any power or authority cares. Do you really think "third term" is where they'll draw the line? I'd put every dollar I have that is not actually about not carrying, but that this is the desired outcome, to enrich themselves.

    I only see one way to stop him, and it's certainly not by law or votes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Dang ill just go tell all the companies that all their deals lost over 8 months of tarrifs and complete disruption actually never happened, because the Supreme court waved their wand and undid it. And withholding funds appropriated by congress, ill just tell them those funds actually were distributed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    We will be doing so much winning you may get tired of all this winning! 🫲🍊🫱

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    Article didn't mention, but as reserves get lower, there is a forced slowdown in withdrawals, and some of the caverns are in danger of collapse which not only creates a massive restoration costs, it also make 50m (1/5th or so) barrels of reserves just disappear.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    As the reserves get lower and lower, the physical facilities can get degraded, Gross says: " You can damage them by pumping too much out of them."

    Why store an emergency reserve in a way where you can't access it as needed?
    Ah who am I kidding, it's of course because it's cheap.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Cheap, fast to build, doesn't appear obvious from the air, hard to destroy with conventional weapons. The drawback of damaging the container when you use it wasn't considered as big an issue back when we knew what the words "strategic" and "emergency" meant. When the administration creates a new crisis every week to distract from the Epstein Files, it suddenly seems insufficient.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    As soon as we're on empty China or Russia will invade something.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    This is Biden and Obama's fault somehow!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    It could be argued that Biden shares some of the blame here. My understanding is that his administration released almost half the SPR during Covid to a) help the global economy and b) make a killing (for the government) selling oil when prices were high.

    The idea being that they'd replenish the reserves after the crisis, when prices were low/normal again.

    The problem with that is that the salt caverns are rated for a limited number of drawdown cycles, so you can't use it as a bank account. They're more like an old-timey piggy bank, you break it to use it.

    That being said, the biggest difference is of course that Biden didn't cause Covid. Trump very much started the war with Iran.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Thanks Obama

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    what a stupid design that can't pump out emergency fluid like it was supposed to do. "has to provide emergency fluid slowly or it fails" lol wow

    way to go team.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Its unavoidable by economics and geology.

    The oil is stored in impermeable salt caves down in Louisiana and Texas. The hard rock salt and oil do not mix so they act as an environmentally stable storage tank that requires no maintenance and doesn't leech into the ground. This is vastly cheaper and much much safer for very long term storage of oil.

    Problem being the caverns "settle" and are partially supported by the pressure of crude oil within them. As the crude is drawn out of them the salt walls could be damaged if pressure is relieved too quickly and/or not replaced with some other support.

    Additionally the pumping infrastructure for crude requires the head pressure of a full tank to hit high flows, and some caverns are emptied first. As caverns empty out there is less head pressure, and requires more pump energy to get it out of a deeper hole. Plus fully emptied caverns will not provide addition inlets for higher flow. This is primarily what drives the "limit of economical recovery" they talk about where flows begin to drop off as the reserve is emptied.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment