all 70 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 120 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Istanbul is not a capital city. Capital of Turkey is Ankara. Obligatory: Erdogan is a fucking twat

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    btw, Constantinople¹ is also not the capital. Why they changed it, though, I can't say.


    ¹ nople

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Do a lot of Europeans stay 10% under the speed limit? Because that sure as hell ain't the case in America.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I think its to calculate with the likely stops you are going to take during the journey

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    In my experience, travelling ~90km/h most of the time but adhering to local limits, stop signs, etc. drags you down to the average ~60km/h speed all throughout the route.

    As for going 120km/h on the highway, you still effectively get around 80-100km/h average speed.

    10% down is extremely optimistic

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago

    By the way: This "how far can I get from a specific point within time xy?" is called isochrones.

    Very interesting when you move somewhere and want to know what's in range.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Now let’s see one by train from those same cities.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

    Now do public transport (not @ OP, just stating a desire for a railway+bus+foot alternative

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    that isn't including time; I understand that layovers make it hard, but they are important for comparing cars to public transit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    A lot more direct routes are on the brink of popping up in Europe, EU launched a very ambitious 2035 and 2040 plan.

    We've already seen a few routes like Copenhagen - Prague pop up, due to expected new infrastructure (Femern Tunnel) landing soon.

    Once EU legitimately builds high speed rails connecting all European capitals, I bet ya we're going to be able to cross the continent with 3 layovers. As long as we stick to larger cities, add 2-3 stops for local connections if you want to go to smaller areas and 2-3 stops if you start in a smaller area.

    Sources for the EU high level plan:

    https://commission.europa.eu/news-and-media/news/connecting-europe-through-high-speed-rail-2025-11-05_en

    https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-modes/rail/high-speed-rail-plan_en

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    Do that in Australia and you're possibly in the next state

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

    No german city pictured because infinite -10% is still infinite

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Much of the Autobahn does have limits though :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    I drive in Germany sometimes and the roads are too busy to be going very fast, my average never got much higher than 150 km/h even if you only count the fastest portions. To be fair I haven't tried crossing the country starting on a Sunday at 3 AM, you can probably go as fast as is efficient to not waste time on extra refuelling because of the car's drag.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Get in loser we are invading Belarus!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    What's with this Mercator projection? GB is giant.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I didn't catch that. Spain is twice as big as the UK, for example, and about 30% larger than Germany or 40% larger than Poland, or 12.5 times larger than Denmark, which looks like a 1/4 or 1/5 the size.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    Istanbul is not a capital... someone already said it.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    TIL about the channel tunnel!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    İstanbul as the capital on a map community in the big 26 🥀

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    It seems about right, I've done the trip from Barcelona to Madrid, it took six hours.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Isn't it nice that you can drive 8 hours and still not be in France?

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Man its easy to forget how fucking microscopic Europe is.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I live in Florida and could just about make it to Miami in 8 hours.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    My daughter just came to visit me in New Mexico from Maryland. 2,000 miles / 3218 km, it is over 24 hours of driving.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Does your daughter have a lead foot? 2000 miles is way over 24 hours of driving and that assumes no extended breaks or heavy traffic. Simple math says to drive 2000 miles in 24 hours you need to average over 83 miles an hour?

    I would guess that a more likely average speed for a drive that long, assuming multiple drivers trading off and not stopping for more than fuel and bathroom breaks, would be about 60mph average. That would take a bit over 33 hours.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    it is over 24 hours of driving.

    Does your daughter have a lead foot? 2000 miles is way over 24 hours of driving

    As I said, it is over 24 hours of driving. I did not realize I needed to specify exactly how long the trip took her, or how much non-driving time was spent.

    According to my map app it is 27 hours of driving, that is over 24 hours of driving as my original post stated.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -11 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    This is why Europeans don't grasp how big the U.S. is. It's a minimum of 33 hours driving from the Pacific to the Atlantic. Their entire country is a day trip from home.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    We do understand that, don’t you worry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Sure, but so often it's "Americans are complicit idiots since half the country doesn't simply protest in the same city" and "dumb car-brained Americans won't even build highspeed rail between LA and NYC" 🙄

    Even smaller-scale things like the definition of rural are so drastically different from places like the UK that they just don't translate.

    The distances and population density differences are huge but simultaneously subtle enough that reasonable-ish sounding yet wildly impractical takes are a common occurrence online.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    "dumb car-brained Americans won't even build highspeed rail between LA and NYC"

    I mean the rail system in the US could definitely be better. Like NYC to LA on Amtrak is scheduled for nearly 3 days of travel and since it's Amtrak you're probably going to be 4 hours late in Chicago and LA so closer to 4 days. For reference NYC to LA on Greyhound is scheduled at the same amount of time but you'd have to be an idiot to think Greyhound is getting you anywhere close to on time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Even if you could solve the impossible land acquisition problem and build non-stop highspeed rail in a straight line between LA and NYC, it'd still be much faster to fly the ~2500 miles than to take a train. It's 6 hour flight vs a well over 12 hour train ride.

    Passenger rail doesn't exist on that scale in the US because it's prohibitively expensive and, even if it were free, obsolete at that distance. It could be better for intrastate or travel on along the coast, but then you run into the land and cost issues. See: California working on this for nearly a decade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Yeah high speed rail across the country is pretty infeasible but the current service is really bad and that's what I was addressing.

    A train service should be faster than a bus on the same distance if for no other reason than the bus is going to have more frequent stops. Amtrak saying they can't do coast any faster than Greyhound should be embarrassing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    You do realise when you say stuff like this that Europe, by the conventional understanding of it extending to the Ural Mountains, is still bigger than the US by around 300.000 square kilometres right? Europeans do know how big it is.

    „But tourists…“ people don’t have the capacity to comprehend scale in unfamiliar environments. The New Zealand subreddit gets all sorts of nationalities asking if they can do crazy shit like drive from Auckland to Queenstown in a day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    Most people dont have to drive from new york to los angeles or similar, thats 42 hours, but we have similar distances in europe as well. The longest ive driven was about 30 hours(dont even ask, thats too much even for me) but a friend of mine and their family had to drive down from åre to barcelona which google maps says is 37 hours. I think it took four days for them. Also from where i am right now, kiruna, a very northern city in sweden, is 18 hours away. The lomgest drive in sweden wothout going through another country is 22 hours so the us being larger isnt a very valid argument. If you look at the entirity of europe its larger than the us and the distances are longer but what actually matters is the population density. When comparing the contiguous us and the eu for example the population density is double in the eu while the whole of europe has a population density about 50% higher than the us.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago

    Racist garbage. This joke of Spaniards having really long siestas is overdone.

  • source