Clover lawns are pretty.
Seems kinda unpopular based on just the sheer amount of pristine lawn grass there is. But is also so incredibly low stakes it's boring
Clover lawns are pretty.
Seems kinda unpopular based on just the sheer amount of pristine lawn grass there is. But is also so incredibly low stakes it's boring
That homelessness is a choice and the people sleeping on the ground and being nibbled on by rats are somehow gaming the system.
I got hit with this by an elderly person one day. They went on about how there's so much food out there that they could just forage for, but they choose to beg for it. I was working, so all I could do was smile and nod, but that smile was just frozen in place like a grimace.
During this whole rant my boss and I kept glancing at each other like they were insane. I can't remember the exact details, I cleansed my brain of that garbage, but there were a few times my boss' eyes flashed and I thought he was going to flip out.
They left like they were the avatar of mercy and understanding. I may have forgotten what they said exactly, but I'll never forget how they looked, because that went right down in my mind under "people I'll never become". I mean... you have to actively try to become that ignorant, right?
...Right?
Even if people did choose to do so, it should be a huge red flag to happen then. If people would rather sleep on the street than participate in society, maybe shit is fucked up.
What do you mean by "depending on where you live?"
Are there a lot of charities and free services that homeless people can use?
Depends on the type of homeless. Folks who were just evicted and need someplace safe so they can get back on their feet? Sure. People with severe mental health issues or drug addictions? not so much.
Going to a shelter involves giving up certain freedoms that living outside affords you. If you're dealing with a heroin addiction, they won't let you bring your drugs in. Got a pet dog companion? No dogs allowed. Going with a friend or partner? Expect to be split up. Also shelters often fill up and the next shelter with space may be an hour walk away.
It also doesn't help that the shelters are all separate charities and don't really coordinate.
So as miserable as it is, many people prefer living in tents and won't even accept a shelter when they're offered help as their tent encampment is being cleared by authorities.
As someone who works with homeless people in an area with a generous population, lots of charities, and free services, you are repeating one of the most dangerous types of misinformation. It's the kind that draws our attention to 0.1% that is technically true, while diminishing the conversation about the actual problem.
The "tourists", as we sometimes call them, are the 0.1%. They come and go and there is always one or two around, but they are not the ones with the serious problems. Some might think of them as outliers in the group, but I wouldn't even group those 0.1% with the other 99.9%. We still make sure they are okay, but they are not the problem when people talk about "homelessness".
I'm assuming you are good hearted. All intelligent good-natured people have mistakenly repeated points before understand the nuances. I just hope you and anyone else reading might consider a different way of thinking. Repeating this talking point makes it very hard for the people trying to fight homelessness. Funding drys up and people die because public discussion often focuses on the "tourists" and not on the actual problem.
isn't as good as the stuff from . Yeah, obviously -- they made bad media back in too, we just don't talk about it any more because no-one cares. All you're saying is "survivorship bias exists." No-one's out here reading trashy sentimentalist novels because they aren't good, but they were hugely popular in the 18th century.
At work we had the radio on in the workshop, and we were discussing my preference for 90s music.
Then some shite song came on that I remembered from decades past, and I had to add "but as you can hear, there was plenty of garbage back then too"
You realize there is incredibly varied, deep, impossibly different and complex music being made all over the world at all times right? In my small-ish city I can see a different show every single night, made up of mostly local and touring artists in small DIY venues that are 100 people or less. And just to show you I'm not bullshitting: https://arcane.city/
The advent of the internet has exploded creativity in so many different ways. Bands starting out can connect with other artists and fans in a DIY sense and play local gigs or tour without any kind of funding or record deals from corporate interests or private equity. Hell, I've gone to "clubs" that were like an old auto body shop ran by my friends, absolutely way past capacity in the hood, to see my partner open for acts from Kenya or at a tiny bar that had a really sick grindcore band from Brazil. It's hard to say things like that happened regularly back in the day but who knows
And it's not like people still don't get big. I saw Alex G play in like backyards and tiny venues 12 years ago and now he plays one of the biggest venues in my city when they tour.
The view that music is washed up now just because the radio plays the same songs is pretty narrow. There was plenty of crap same-y boring music on the radio back then too. There's a reason why all the rockers you're talking about hated disco lol.
The creative types are always going to keep seeking out this type of thing and flourish. You could say the same about underground hip hop and rap, the club scene, punk, hardcore, jazz, EDM, folk, etc etc.
No-one’s out here reading trashy sentimentalist novels because they aren’t good, but they were hugely popular in the 18th century.
I mean, trashy sentimentalist is like half of Shakespeare tbh. Its all jokes about women, dick jokes and violence.
Shakespeare didn’t write novels in the 18th century? I’m referring to a particular literary movement that started like 200 years after Shakespeare’s death.
Most of our heros in movies actually kind of suck. They are for the most part only able to solve the world through violence because by some magical or supernatural or just bad writing, in an absurd position to do so.
I blame this on why I have more people willing to literally kill or die for me in my life then willing to engage in uncomfortable dialogue or eat more fiber for me.
The most boring, I dunno. My most boring unpopular opinion? Licorice is absolutely delicious.
Also - music now is certainly as good as at any time in the past.
Oh but Fontaines DC, Leon Bridges, King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard, Waxahatchee and Big Thief and Idles and Wunderhorse and Doechii, Charley Crockett, Jason Isbell, Steve Lacey, there is such an abundance of very good music, we go to concerts and see live bands and really, there is so much great music being made. And I'm older than 50, lol. AI 'art' of any sort can rot in hell, yeah.
We're all going to be fine.
I doubt it. We have a very large fossil record of extinct species. Nothing says we won't end up as yet another.
There's two ways to go extinct - by coming to a sudden stop or by gradually changing over time until you're no longer recognisable as the same species.
Well, see, the "sudden stop" is really just sudden at the time scale that Earth operates on. But in all these extinctions, where multiple species got wiped out entirely, at the scale of the species themselves it's a slow ass grind that takes multiple centuries.
A species gradually changing is evolution, extinction is where the species dies out, bit of a difference
One of the most memorable examples of bravery I've witnessed was my Italian coworker who straightened his back and said with firm conviction that he enjoys pineapple on pizza.
AoE3 is better than AoE2
Now thems fighting words.
Well I quoted "we need a new plague" for years until it finally happened. Didn't thin the herd as much as it could have.
PiNeApPlE oN PiZzA eWwW!!!!1one
I'm so sick of pretend pearl clutching over this non-issue. If you don't like it, don't eat it. If you do, that's fine too.
And for the record, my stance on pineapple on pizza is.... drumroll
Tap for spoiler
Who the fuck cares!
Charred fresh pineapple is completely different than pale bland lumps from a can too. Hawaiian style pizza can be good but blandness is death.
I'm about to do ham and eggs on a pizza.
Breakfast pizza is amazing. Replace the tomato sauce with sausage gravy, sprinkle on the scrambled eggs, diced ham, and any other toppings of your choice, add the shredded cheese, and bake at 400F for 10-15 minutes (depending on your oven).
The one thing I tried on pizza that was unexpectedly gross to me was broccoli. I actually really enjoy broccoli but on a pizza it made the whole thing taste nasty.
Tell me more. How's the egg cooked? Whole?
My wife likes pineapple on pizza. This is absolutely not a non-issue for me! We get half pineapple and half pepperoni and sometimes I get a pineapple on my side of the pizza!
I don't like pot.
Nothing against it, really. I just don't like the feeling.
You wanted boring.
Yeah I also don't like pot. Mainly because it smells bad tho... I've never actually used it before since I can't imagine putting something that smells like that near my nose.
Same. Cannabis just makes me fall asleep.
Sounds boring to me. Not boring would be "I dont like pot so I am going to craft a bipartisan police state and erode nearly every civil liberty in a pursuit to enforce my way of life upon others from a barrel of a gun."
Giving everyone an equal vote is bad.
"Democracy is government of the people, by the people, and for the people... But the people are retarded."
The issue is who decides on what vote everyone gets? I assume the idea is that experts should decide? But there plenty of "experts" with qualifications that I wouldn't want to make decisions.
Taken to the extreme this would basically be Plato's philosopher king, which sounds nice in theory, but I don't see working in practice.
Equal vote might be bad, but it's the lesser evil in practice.
To throw in my unpopular opinion (not sure if it qualifies as boring or not). There should be no age requirement for voting (in that sense it's already the case that not everyone has an equal vote because children do not have one).
I think C# is a perfectly adequate and fairly enjoyable programming language, even though I dislike Microsoft and their products.
Papyrus is actually a well-fitting font for Avatar and also perfectly fine as a font.
So is Comic Sans for anything related to comics or comic-like things.
Automotive racing is a sport.
I feel like that's a pretty common opinion, I've never heard of anyone railing against motorsports not being a sport.
Yeah, I've seen a lot more hot takes on the topic, but none of them seem to be here today.
These days, I hear the line "it's just people driving in circles" from F1 fans dumping on NASCAR, more than anything else.
But like, any sport sounds boring when you just break it down like that. Baseball, basketball, either kind of football, they're all about a bunch of dudes just moving a ball around.
Pineapple Pizza is just another pizza, get over it. it's fine.
"Marvel/DC movies BAD."
They're products aimed at children with the intention of selling other related products. The fact that some biological adults love them excessively in certain communities/cultures says something about those groups, but doesn't change the nature of the films themselves. What exactly did you expect?!
Eh I think they are more aimed at adults just by the way they are marketed including the toys which mostly make money in the adult collectors market. They just give the excuse to bring kids.
Hi,
I’m only commenting to show something… Seconds ago I read a comment about Ukraine and pornography with which I completely disagreed. I left the thread, came here, read a comment I completely agree with.
Both are made by the same commenter.
See, we can agree on some things and disagree on others. There’s more than two personalities available.
Agree, and as an adult who enjoys comic book movies. I also like really good cinema. Liking good movies does not mean movies that aren't winning Oscars are all bad. It means you're just a gatekeeper.
I can sit down and watch a movie like the Brutalist or the Whale absolutely lose my shit at them.
But sometimes I don't feel like being emotionally destroyed and just want good guys punching bad guys with predictable plot.
Humans are complex and sometimes you may like one and other times the other, there is no "you can't like X movie". Only gatekeepers think that way.
I agree to a great degree. And expectations should be adjusted accordingly. I remember having a great time watching Thor: Ragnarok, not because it was beautiful art that made me reflect and cry and whatnot but because it was fun! And not extremely dumb, lol, and that's all we can ask from these movies. Rarely do people only enjoy things with a lot of depth and complexity, and even if you're like that about movies, are you the same about music? Food? You've never enjoyed a greasy burger? So yeah there's no need to hate on them, and no need to expect more from them either (but if it happens it's always a nice surprise!). ✌️
Agreed, with the caveat that the Zack Snyder DC films were genuine trash. Not even on a comic book reader and fan level, just on a Zack Snyder level, we need to stop letting that asshat write and make movies.
I really liked Watchmen (perhaps my favourite superhero/comic book movie still) and 300 was very alright, I guess some executives felt the same way... but yeah, everything else he's touched is varying degrees of shit, he's the anti Midas. 🥲
I’m not a fan of Watchmen in general, because I’m also just not a fan of Alan Moore in general, but they are the kind of people who work well together, so I’m willing give it to him, Zack Snyder is the guy for those movies. Same goes for Miller. He could also do a good job with the works of Garth Ennis. Regardless of my personal feelings on all of those folks.
Edit: Also, just like what you like and enjoy it, I have my opinions, but don’t let some douchebag on the internet make you question what you like. The heart wants what the heart wants. (With caveats, nothing is universal.)
That edit is very wholesome but entirely unnecessary, lol. Maybe I AM a simpleton who enjoys shallow things, who knows? But what I do know is that it is even more pathetic to be both a simpleton AND a coward who can't accept it. And I don't know much about comics in general but I'll take your word for it! 😅
Great username btw! ✌️
I mean yeah i think that's evil to market towards kids and use them as a hook to make parents overspend, that's like the primary definition of "bad". It's bad for the kids they market to and it's bad for society too.
Maybe it’s just me, but I also find it weird to see adults with t-shirts or stickers on their cars of what are essentially kid’s shows and comics.
They weren’t originally written for children. The writers were writing their trauma and what they were experiencing at the time for other adults. In fact the readers back then were average of college aged. You may think these comics were written for children because you think their writers were good at writing but actually they were mostly weak writers. Like Stan Lee originally wrote romance. He was a weak writer. Excellent worldbuilder, though.
Comics now are still mainly written for adults.
Plain black coffee = best coffee
I kinda feel that "plain black coffee" in it's various forms - Americano, drip brew, whatever - is the only way to actually drink coffee. That's not to say I don't approve of milk coffee or lattes or whatever - I love them - but they're drinks which have coffee in them, even if it's a dominant flavor. A banana smoothie isn't a banana.
People tend to think that dark roasts/more bitter coffees are "stronger". They actually have slightly less caffeine, as the longer the beans are roasted and higher temperatures they are cooked at naturally cooks off some.
For the most part a lighter/darker roast is all about what one likes to taste.
top 100 comments