1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 2 months ago

The website is AI trash. Also, it has a page dedicated to Jesus, which means I can quote this.

Acts 4:32 All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had.

This is immediately after Jesus dies: it’s how the disciples lived. I find it hilarious this person wants to track the DSA while not opening their B-i-b-l-e.

  • source
  • 46 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 122 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    Oh look. They did another fascism.

    >thisisfine.jpg

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    But I was told we were overreacting when we said Trump was a fascist and would do fascism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, but it’s not like the fascists had their plan written down in a todo list or anything. Like a project or something. Scheduled for 2025 maybe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 79 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Meanwhile, when I ask my mother her opinion about this: "but Hunter Biden made so many corrupt deals and he was doing crack!"

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I respect that he pays sex-workers for sex and doesn’t offer them gigs on TV shows that he never intends to deliver on in order to score a freebie by cornering a woman in a hotel room. Rape by another name in my opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    your ramble suggests trump's crimes are Hunter's, just fyi

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    How? I specifically say I like that he doesn’t do those things. I didn’t say Trump’s name because his scumminess proceeds him. There’s literally no one as disgusting as Trump and the fact they go after a person who does something as pedestrian as pay a sex-worker when they back the best friend Epstein ever had just makes me draw the comparison. I worded it that way to draw the direct comparison, so I’m okay with it being a little ambiguous (though pretty clear imho).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 64 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Same people who looked you dead in the face and said, “It’s government overreach to require masks!” BTW

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 58 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Isn't it pretty easy in the US?

    For some reason people need to register with their government what their political affiliation is. Not sure if any other country in the world does this but it's stupid as fuck for every reason.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    You don't need to register your political affiliation in the us. You can register as independent. As far as i know it just dictates what ballot you'll get (which is silly)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    That's still registering your political affiliation with the government.

    Which is still fucked up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Not all states collect political affiliations, but in any case, you don't have to register a party. I have been an Unaffiliated Independent since I first registered to vote in 1977. I can't vote in primaries, but neither party can count on my vote, and they have to earn it every election.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    My political affiliation is try, convict, and execute every politician, except maybe a couple dozen. With due process. Pretty sure I can say that still.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Still, I'm begrudgingly impressed that someone working directly for Hegseth has the technical wherewithal to put together a database.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago
    [–] 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Poison their data? Everyone change their political affiliation to NPA. Then vote however you want.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I think you can freely change affiliations in those states prior to the election, as a lot of people join the other party to vote for the guy that they think is less electable when they know their own guy already is going to get it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    to vote for the guy that they think is less electable when they know their own guy already is going to get it.

    I can't even compute why anyone would want to do that, much less imagine ‘a lot of people’ doing it. Is that, like, throwing a pity bone to the less-electable guy? Could this be how the US got Trump?

    Yall's political shenanigans are fun, but you need ranked voting yesterday.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Oh it makes a lot of sense if the ones pushing the strategy know the electorate. The democrats don't clearly. It is a part of how the prez got elected I am sure, but if done right it is quite effective.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago
    [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    Late night ICE visits aren't far off.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    The US doesn't already have a troll army? Every other country is doing it. With AI shitposting it's never been easier.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    GFY Drunkseth

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago

    Why wouldn't you track your political enemies, said the leftist.

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/usa view that post
    [–] 11 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Rely on this information for what?

    In a lengthy disclaimer on the database website, Pounds warned that her data may not be 100 percent accurate. “Inferred, ideological, and patron/sphere associations are analytical interpretations, not statements of fact, and nothing here alleges unlawful conduct by any named person or organization,” the disclaimer states. “Do not rely on this material without independent verification.”

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    What a pussy headline. I'm thinking, this is shitty, but isn't it just the bullshit voter registration rolls that the asshole is illegally trying to fuck with? But no, if you only read the title, like the majority of us morons, you wouldn't realize it was a database of suspected DSA members or people who lean that way. Just a modern day version of good ol' McCarthy's ,"I have here in my hand a list of two hundred and five people that were known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping the policy of the State Department."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 1 comment in c/gestapo_usa@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    You can put my affiliation down as Fuck the GOP.

  • source