Comments

all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

Any modern TV that does not do this spying crap?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    How does this work if the TV is never connected to the Internet?

    If the TV's features are restricted or don't work because it requires an internet connection, then it's going back to the store. And I don't care if Best Buy has a $45 restocking fee. I'll charge that back claiming they sold the TV without disclosing that it requires network access to function fully. That's fraud.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 54 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 113 points 2 months ago (15 children)

    Not connecting it to the internet and using HDMI like we've been doing for the last 20 years...

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    My fear is that this will change. We already saw LG load malware via windows when connected. So in theory future devices like Roku and Apple TV could act as a proxy for the tv.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I also fear we will have to install faraday mesh in our walls when these things start arriving with their own internet connection to collect your data and show you ads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    They could but why would they? Roku sells data on you already and has limited things to gain from teaming up on the off chance you’re using a second source for content. Apple sells on the basis of privacy for a higher price and if they’re getting into that game like Roku they’d just spy themselves and not help a competitor on the chance a consumer has blocked it.

    If anything Roku and others being able to say “we have data on people TV makers don’t” increases their own value proposition.

    The real risk IMO is on device analysis and built in cellular modems sending this data. That and things like Amazon sidewalk meaning your neighbor’s Alexa device passes it on for a fee. That and just refusing to work without internet of course.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    We already saw LG load malware via windows when connected.

    This was 100% a Windows driver issue as opposed to a TV issue. And I could see possibly Roku doing this, but not Apple. Apple being Unix based precludes the type of driver loading that Windows is susceptible to.

    Same goes for Linux. Just use Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 13 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I hear that some models now require internet access to even be able to use it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Sounds like a great item to return to the store for a full refund. Manufactures just love returned products, completely destroys the profit on the next several sales.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    I recently bought a new TV and did some research to find the "least worst" TV with regard to internet connectivity and reliance on its "smart OS" navigation to just use an external HDMI port. I can report pretty good news for the Sony Bravia line of Android TVs.

    • there was no requirement to connect it to the internet
    • during setup there is a choice for "basic" which adds only a few default apps (which are uninstallable/disablable by the user)
    • there is a setting called "Power on and remember last input port". What this means is you last used HDMI1 port when you powered off the TV, when you power it back up again it automatically goes right back to that HDMI input port without any extra button presses or user interaction. In practice this means you see the Sony logo on the screen and just a fraction of a second the graphic circles of part of the AndroidTV interface before it switches to the HDMI1 input where we left off before powering off the tv prior.

    Bonus feature we like:

    • there is a setting you can enable/disable that if the TV is already powered on, when you power on a device on another HDMI port than the one you're on, the TV will automatically switch to that HDMI input without prompting. So if we're watching the AppleTV on HDMI1 and then want to watch a Blu-ray, simply powering on the Blu-ray player will also have the TV switch to that HDMI2 input.

    I wish there was no AndroidTV OS on it at all, but the only time I've ever seen it was the one time when we went through the initial setup. We haven't seen or interacted with it since.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    My dream is for my kid to learn enough about electronics to be able to open up his TV, identify any microphones, and be able to disable them. Then he might have a chance of privacy when he’s an adult.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    That's likely not going to cover it. They're taking snapshots of what's on screen and sending that info home. They're using wifi and Bluetooth to get your location and information about what other devices you have. Never connecting it to the internet is going to be one of the best things to do for privacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    If they're using bluetooth and wifi, we better find and remove those components too. Ain't no way they won't have the OS forcibly connect to the nearest open network or start bluetooth to deliver what they want when you ain't using it, regardless of whether or not you have connected to internet or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    If they’re using bluetooth and wifi, we better find and remove those components too.

    Removing the Bluetooth/wifi module maybe more difficult. For cost cutting reasons, these controllers are built into the logic boards now, but disconnecting the bluetooth/wifi antennas inside the TV is trivially easy. They are simple push-on mechanical connectors. No wire cutting needed. Gently grab the gold/silver metal part pull straight up from the board.

    I just googled "lcd TV logic board" and this was one of the first images I found. I put a red square around the antenna connectors.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Lenny, never let that TV touch the internet. Who's that mic going to talk to with no connectivity?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    Unless they start adding cellular connectivity for serving ads. Though maybe the calculation doesn't work out, presumably most people would either connect the TV to the internet voluntarily, or they're not gonna use the TV:s UI much and thus not see many ads.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    My friend, we don't need to speculate. The industry gives us all the info we need.

    https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sixty-one-percent-of-us-internet-households-use-their-smart-tv-as-the-primary-streaming-device-according-to-parks-associates-302653704.html

    https://worldscreen.com/majority-of-u-s-viewers-use-smart-tvs-as-primary-streaming-devices/

    Right now, it's about consolidating power at the TV operating system level. Make the TV replace devices like a Roku box and you get all that data. 61% of US households use the TV as their main streaming device. So that's about 82 million households. Some stats get as high as 70%

    https://www.aidigital.com/blog/connected-tv-stats

    So connected TV use is growing at a huge rate.

    It's a hard number to get, but I've seen estimates that smart tvs are subsidized by about $200 per unit based on a value of $120 per viewer per year on days collection when they're connected. Average about 2 people per household and a 3 year lifespan of the TV, and that's $720-$200, so $500 net profit from data sales on average per unit. So already that's close to $40-$50 billion in data sales alone across the smart TV market in the US. Without adding in hidden bells and whistles to collect more data.

    But the gap the industry sees isn't people wisely not connecting their TVs. It's that there's so many connected devices! They want the TV to just replace some of them.

    https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/392601/89-of-us-households-now-have-streaming-video-se.html

    And it's working. Simply causing TV OS bloat to try and get ahead of human laziness and undercut Roku is the goal. With huge gains to be made without spending a penny on things like embedded sims cards and cellular service for 40 million TVs sold annually in the US to collect data on a group that's already shifting patterns to the TV as the primary device. Why bother? It's wasted money for most units sold. If companies just sold cheap, subsidized TVs that demanded they must be connected to work, then that's the easiest, cheapest, highest profit angle to play.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    I recently purchased an old plasma TV I will be tinkering with. No internet connectivity of any kind. It is hard to get excited about new TVs that are basically google and Bezos boxes and I do not wish to send them a single dime just to be spied on when I just want to watch my movies on bluray.

    I am aware I can just disconnect my TV from the internet, but I don't want to support the stupid platforms that are built into the TV. Why is it any of Googles, amazon or any other platforms business what I use my TV for?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    Just buy a monitor ,connect a SBC to it ,ad software ,install IPTV player, tvgarden , and visit FMHY.net for ideas

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    ad software

    I prefer my TVs to have no ads, thank you very much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    😂😂😂🤔😂😂😂, never seen ads in the last 10 years

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    But you use the Internet? I doubt that. Even torrent sites have some.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    I think its country and provider related.

    Iam on Linux laptop,phone is graphene , ubo installed.

    Nobody I know uses torrents , streaming is normal ,somethimes with use off scraper.

    Have a look at FMHY.net

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    and how will you control it with the TV remote? don't say to use the mouse and keyboard from the couch because then I rather won't turn it on at all

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    to me the reason I don't want a mouse is I need to move it on some surface for it to work, and even then it's handling is much less accurate than at the desk, and its a chore to target that little button on the screen. from this point keyboard based navigation would work better, in apps that implement it well. I can imagine using a keyboard, but most other people I know would not accept that, because it's too big.

    so far the best option I heard is a normal TV remote but with a keypad and trackpad on the back. but do those work with IR, are the signals of these buttons standardized?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Get a media TV remote and a USB IR receiver.

    Edit: I wrote Bluetooth when I meant USB

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    It is clear until that point, but how do you set up full control with that? afaik by default nothing listens to the input events generated by the IR receiver

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Well, certain inputs like will map directly to keyboard equivalents. The OK button generally maps to . And then other inputs like play/pause, volume, skip forward/backward are standard PC inputs that just about every OS supports out of the box. Most keyboards have those buttons on them and they "just work".

    For additional functionality you can use specialized software to manage it.

    The IR receiver is just a "translator". The input the computer sees is just a standard HID peripheral (Human Input Device).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Sounds like a you problem, sometimes you gotta live different if you don't wanna be tracked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    my solution is smart TV with restricted VLAN. then it can use jellyfin or whatever I feel like. but I can't recommend that to the average joe, who does not even have any network equipment capable of restricting a port to a VLAN.

    Seriously. any recommendation that does not solve this problem is at most a tech demo. remote control, preferably without the fragile smartphone. and no airmouse, that's terrible even on my LG TV. hardware side it's simple, get an USB IR receiver, or use the HDMI-CEC signals coming from the TV. but there is nothing to tie it into the linux desktop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    I use Plasma Big screen and have a remote sized keyboard with trackpad. The arrow keys are usually all you need, but the rest is there if you do need it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    now that is interesting. does it work with IR, or wifi/bluetooth only? if IR, are the signals of these buttons standardized, so that I can expect it to work well if I order one?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I can't recommend to the average joe...

    That's a bit uncalled for, don't you think?

    I just used a mini pc to create a seperate network, then blocked internet for TV network. Then i setup microsocks and made an exception for that proxy and jellyfin. This way I can use smartube (it has a proxy option) for youtube and jellyfin for other media without logging in or providing internet access to anything on the TV.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    ...by not buying one. /thread

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    But what stops LG from convincing the Ubuntu maintainers to make an LG variant of their supposed driver to magically appear in your snap or apt package repository? You hope to God they don't, but the danger is always there.

    What a convoluted way of saying Linux is better. And using Ubuntu as reference...

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Ha! I knew there had to be an EDID blocker out there!

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Are there TVs that require an internet connection to simply use without "smart" features?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Not as such, but there are models that will be crippled in various ways by the lack of a connection.

    I saw one that would frantically try to connect (to what, I don't know) for several minutes out of every hour and while that was going on (because it was offline) the UI would slow down.

  • source
  • parent
  • I installed a VPN on mine.

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 53 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    As a former IT professional, it blows my mind that people actually hook their TVs up to an Internet connection. Why would you ever want your TV installing updates? Or for that matter, give it the chance to install malware? Not to mention, the potential for it to turn on a microphone (!?) and listen to you in your home! Why does a TV have a microphone built in?! A TV should never be able to record you!

    I bought a mini PC and hooked it up to my TV. It's not that powerful, but it can stream 4K video through a web browser. I use a wireless mouse and keyboard on my couch to access it

    Because it's a PC, I can install ad blockers and other security features to keep junk from popping up while I'm using it. Then I just stream all my shows and whatnot, fullscreen through the browser. No interruptions, total control over what is installed/playing, and the TV itself doesn't connect to the Internet. It's just a dumb device, acting like a monitor.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    You can just remove the wifi module. Lay the TV on its face on a piece of cardboard on the bed. Remove the back, locate the wifi module, remove it, and Bob's your uncle or something.

    Seriously, it can't access the internet if it doesn't have an access point.

    As for the computer connected to your television and it's access point, it's simple not to connect a Windows computer to a TV. Most any windows compatible computer you'd do that with can run Linux and if windows is going to allow this kind of nonsense they don't deserve your business or your data.

    I absolutely know my take is the view of someone who's tech savvy enough to do both things.

    I get that for the last 30 or so years I have been the tech support for basically my entire family and some of their friends.

    But if it's going to be basically impossible to buy a dumb TV and expensive as all get out to do it, it's time to find that tech savvy person you know and ask for help because otherwise this will keep happening.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Just. Don't. Buy. These. Things.

  • source