Another fucking slap on the wrist. "The payment will be distributed in annual instalments over a 10-year period." It’s literally a rounding error for them. I assume this is the same lawsuit as the teen addiction one, where the states had asked for $1.4T in damages - in which case this would amount to literally 1% of the request and add insult to injury.
post
The tech company will pay a maximum of $16.68bn (£12.26bn), according to court documents.
Meta denied wrongdoing in agreeing to settle.
Ok, buddy.
"up to" over 10 years, which means they'll pay 1.8B this year, a massive 3% of annual income, for now and find a way to get out of this before the decade is up
And no user will see a nickel
Where does the money go? Tax revenue? Is that how we’re making the rich pay their share? I didn’t violate any laws, but I still pay taxes and they should too — for the same reasons.
Lawyers take their cut off the top.
35% to the lawyers
15% to court, state, lawyer administrative costs
40% to Governor's cousin's LLC established since last Tuesday specializing in child online safety issues according to their website which goes on to read "would you like me to create promotional flyers and other materials in addition to the website"?
15% nobody can trace where it went - but did you know BOYS are playing GIRL sports?!
25% to a program that passively encourages risky online behavior
20% to pro-business tax breaks
That's right taxpayer, you're gonna need to chip in for the extra 50%.
To be paid out over 10 years, across almost every state. Just drops in an ocean.
Cost of doing business... if they aren't going to own up and make changes to prevent it in the future, what's the point?
Who gets the money? Is it enough to disincentives future abuses? Is the abuse still happening? Can they be trusted to not cause such abuses again?
Where does this money go? To lawyers? Government? Won’t be going to the public
It is now "official" that meta harms children and yet hundreds of people keep upvoting meta content here on lemmy
Wrong link? It gives me an error
It's a start.
Like all anti-corporate settlements, it is ridiculously favorable to the abuser.
IANAL, but doesn't settlement mean they don't admit fault, they have no judgement to actually force changes, and the same case can't be brought again, aka, they get to keep harming kids, just have to cough up some tiny slice of profit and offer some lip service to doing better? Or, to rephrase, as long as the government gets a cut, they can keep abusing?
Settlements usually come with enforceable changes. If they continue the same practices, they can be sued again. In such a case, the penalties will likely be established ahead of time in the settlement and will be significantly harsher for the repeat offense.
Thats correct. So basically good for the company and the lawyers. Sometimes its the best option but in this case, just means they can do it again.
I worked for a security company that has stolen wages and has settled out of court 4 separate times. They will likely continue to do so.
the ultra rich are evil by default, they couldn't get to that level of wealth by caring about humanity.
Damn, they pulled the article. Sorry about that, nothing to see here (for now at least).
Edit: link updated.
That’s too expensive for my taste. Is there a cheaper subscription option to abuse children?
Gotta break a few eggs and such.
99% of kids we screwed up won't see a dime, but at least we can move on and keep screwing up another generation though. Will pass the cost of this onto the very families we are screwing up too.
In a normal company, needing to cough up seventeen billion dollars gets the CEO fired.
all 40 comments