top 92 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 67 points 2 months ago

China stealing anything loses any bite when you realize every AI company stole everything and is supported by the Government.

RAM prices will fall now, this is good news. Fuck the cartel.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago* (7 children)

    That's nice. Affordable RAM when?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Whenever the tariffs come down.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Wonder if a consumer can get around the tariff. If the price is too high, it becomes more economical to pay a bit extra for a roundabout way of getting it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Gray market imports into the US from China have already been big business, especially among counterfeiters and drop-shippers. Idk about getting a full-sized SUV over the border. But designer bags, electronics, and the like have been coming over for at least a decade.

    Idk how much retail buyers save, though. Much like with the drug trade and human trafficking, there's inevitably an enormous mark-up for this kind of smuggling. And because it is functionally unregulated, you get a ton of refurbished, low-grade, and outright fraudulent sales. Smuggling tends to accrue money to the smugglers and the various officials you need to bribe to move the merchandise. You rarely see retail level discounts, unless the market is so glutted with knock-offs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Canadian here ...what's a tariff?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Canada–China trade war

    Might be worth doing a little research. Canada's never been shy about using them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago*

    RAM has not come from China, and China isn't exporting much of it yet. Unless Canada and the EU and Japan and everyone else is also handing out tariffs on Taiwan, Korea, etc like the US is, their point was the price of RAM doesn't have anything to do with tariffs.

    The price of RAM is high globally because the AI companies have bought future-RAM with money the RAM producing companies gave them to build data centers that don't exist yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Afaik Chinese DDR4 ram production is already keeping prices in that segment sane. They are working to break the ASML monopoly and sanctions on extreme violet light lithography to make the most advances chips and then will ramp up production. They are churning out like 10 times more engineers than the US and EU. They are ramping up but not sure when they will be able to compete at the highest level. I read 2030 earliest.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago

    Things are moving ahead ahead of schedule.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I wonder how long it will take the US to view RAM like they view oil and invade China?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    That would officially be WW3, and it wouldn't go well for the US.

    Pretty much the entire world either dislikes or outright hates the US right now, and that's not going to change anytime soon. There's far more positive sentiment towards China around the world than towards the US.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 49 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    This was easy to predict.

    Chinese government is not stupid. They have a strategy (more so than USA does). Years ago that was to dominate global manufacturing and supply chains. They were successful. Now the goal is to reach parity with Western chipmakers and/or get ahead. It's happening.

    The AI boom was like a golden gift to them. Semiconductor prices are through the roof. So if they can produce almost anything at all in quantity it will sell for inflated prices.

    While the tech companies of the world jerk each other off with AI, China is building DRAM capacity. CXMT is the first and will not be the last. They will scale quickly. If they have the process perfected they will build a fab in the time it takes USA to conduct the environmental review for the consideration of allowing a permit application to build a fab. They will not build one fab they will build 5 or 10. I'm proud to be American and I love my country but I compare USA to China on the ability to execute large projects like this and China will win every time. We have too much red tape, too many lawsuits and insurance and moving parts. China executes faster and more decisively.

    So give it a year or two and China will have a fleet of pretty good fabs. They will sell memory for way less than what the others do. And then just as China made themselves indispensable for manufacturing, they will make themselves indispensable for DRAM.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    There's also the issue of things not necessarily having to be the MOST profitable thing ever. Memory manufacturers decided to go to the highest bider because money. I suspect Chinese company will be quite happy to just flood the market with cheaply priced (relatively speaking) products and just get everyone's money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    This 100%.

    HBM has massive profit margins. It's also hard as hell to make, as it involves multiple stacked wafers. This vid is a good catchup on that and the rest of this situation.

    China will HAPPILY flood the non-HBM DRAM market with memory 'only' 2x as expensive as last year. And every PC maker, automaker, gadget maker, etc will happily buy it because as Valve famously put it, "They give us a price every month or something, and they say 'you can buy that many' and it's yes or no, and if we say no then they never talk to us again." Source interview. If China says 'we have consistent price, we have consistent supply, we can meet your needs' and the quality is decent then it doesn't matter if it's slower or DDR4 or whatever people will love them for it.

    And play that ahead.
    The big 3 are focused on HBM and most of their capacity is already sold through 2027
    If China can scale up production of standard DDR4/5 and sell it reliably at 200% of normal price (aka, below current market rates) then there's less incentive to build fabs. So they will let China have the consumer market with their blessings. And thus China will have made themselves essential in yet another product supply chain.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I suspect Chinese company will be quite happy to just flood the market with cheaply priced (relatively speaking) products and just get everyone's money.

    And will still be able to make a very healthy profit by doing that.

    The quest for "max_profit" is not (and never has been) sustainable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Much of that red tape is there for good reason. It protects our natural resources and our citizens. I don't disagree the US could do better, but things like environmental studies are important to ensure healthy growth, not just rapid. AI data center bullshit happening right now is a perfect example of the impact and destruction of steamrolling these things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    In general I agree- the concept of red tape, environmental evaluations, etc is a good thing.

    But we all know what the road to Hell is paved with.

    Key is to find a middle ground- that lets a fab be built in an environmentally friendly way but also rapidly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -10 points 2 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 41 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    As an earlier post pointed out - the Ai industry stole everything with the support of the government at our expense. The point is moot.

    If the Chinese theft benefits us as consumers then they are the Robin Hood of computation hardware. The good guys.

    They didn't steal from "us". They stole from the billionaires. I'm fine with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    Yah I used to be on the "China steals" bandwagon, back when it had weight but now it doesn't matter, even when it come to Chinas genocide of the ueagers, America is helping cause gaza with isreal not to mention what its doing to Cuba. America is no better then China now in my eyes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I'm with you on this. China has been a much more responsible member of the international community than the US. I strongly disagree with what China is doing with regard to Taiwan, the South China Sea, and suppression of free expression, but otherwise they're the lesser of two evils.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    The concept of IP is theft to begin with. No technology arises from a vacuum, it is all built on the collective efforts of humanity through the ages. The fact that some billionaire can claim ownership over an idea is a moral failing of capitalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, I generally agree with you. Just seems unfair that China gets to reap the rewards for the efforts of people working elsewhere. The fact that billionaires just pocket all the rewards anyway makes that point a bit moot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    As a member of the working class, I don't particularly mind if a socialist country reaps the rewards of my work. Also, it's not like IP is a zero-sum game, and that an idea put into use in one place means it can't be put into use in another. It's like ancient Babylon getting mad at Sumeria for putting seeds into the ground.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    There is zero guarantee China will sell it to consumers given that companies and governments all over the world are willing to pay premium value for current ram prices anyway

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    We should still benefit from China making good memory chips. Assuming the chips are fungible, China might buy fewer Samsung or Taiwanese chips and that's more chips for us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Nothing a import ban can't fix.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    This is totally going to happen. And there is nothing you can do as far as spying with memory but I guarantee they will come up with some bullshit excuse related to that. I mean the only thing I can think of is some sort of kill switch but that would just kill the machine. Do that enough and nobody buys your RAM so what would be the point. Maybe just plain market manipulation but that’s pretty much happening now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    let's be honest, these are already banned by the Chinese device ban that banned routers.

    but, truthfully, if I can't even trust Chinese IP cams to not snoop on me, why would I trust RAM?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    Nothing a import ban can't fix.

    Just because the US bans something, that doesn't stop the rest of the world from buying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    No shit. What I want though is memory prices to go back down here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

    The Chinese government being much more fans of a directed market than of a totally unregulated one (neither of which is a Free Market by the way - that thing only exists when barriers to market entry are incredibly low, and it's not as if any Jack or Joe can set up their very own memory production cottage factory in their backyard, so it's not possible for there to be a Free Market in RAM under current technology), they'll probably make sure that RAM only ever leaves China as part of more complex products (i.e. computers, smartphones, tablets and so on) made in China, thus making also Made In China for those product lines be more competitive.

    (In other words, want a gaming PC or smartphone with more memory - buy the whole thing from China or pay 10x more)

    If properly managed this could boost quite a lot more digital electronics industries in China than merelly RAM.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    they'll probably make sure that RAM only ever leaves China as part of more complex products

    Which other components are subject to this limitation in China?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    It's about complex products which contain RAM rather than other component.

    Anything made in China which has RAM in it will have its price affected by the price of RAM so if Chinese brands of such products have access to cheaper RAM than non-Chinese brands, they can outcompete the latter on price whilst delivering similar quality products.

    Personally I tend to assemble my own desktop PCs, but for example in the past when buying a Mini-PC I would pick a Chinese brand one if cheaper since the quality is the same. Now imagine if the Chinese brand is now 1/2 the price of the non-Chinese one because the former uses RAM from China whose price is nowhere as high as the hyper-inflated South Korean RAM - in this kind of device were the quality is the same, the Chinese product will always be the better option if it's half the price because of using way cheaper RAM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    Honestly it'll probably be more like 3 or 4 times cheaper. I'm excited for the effects of this to start to balloon outwards. Now China just needs a graphics card/GPU manufacturer that can be competitive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    They are working on cracking EUV lithography. From the sweatshop of the west to leading in 58 of 65 advanced technologies already. Neoliberalism has been the ruin of the west.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Do you have a link to a list of the 65 advanced technologies? I'd be quite interested in checking it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    It was mentioned in the later part of this video: Eurasia Breaks USA: Three Front Defeat Forming | Prof. Radhika Desai.

    But the source is this ASPI "Australian Strategy Policy Institute". Ah found it: https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/aspis-critical-technology-tracker-2025-updates-and-10-new-technologies/

    In total, China now leads in 66 of the 74 technologies tracked, with the United States leading in the remaining eight—an imbalance that underscores why trusted partners need to act together to leverage comparative advantages, reduce concentration risk and shape the trajectory of critical technologies together.

    Here is the list of technologies: https://techtracker.aspi.org.au/list-of-technologies The website seems a bit of a mess.

    The video frames this as a function of neoliberalism slowly bleeding education and fundamental research dry (and also destroying demand because nobody can afford anything any more).

    And also China has 1.4 billion people, invested into them and has slowly crept up the technology ladder, and now turn out an order of magnitude more engineers every year than the west.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 57 points 2 months ago* (19 children)

    They won't sell it to you, they're just making sure they aren't beholden to the same ram shortages the rest of the world is.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    There's nothing Chinese won't sell to you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I'm take one Beijing, please.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    That'll be 4 trillion (4×10^12) USD, please

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    unless they eventually don't need foreign currency anymore because their own country produces everything they could ever need or want

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    Nope. China is too big of a country to produce everything they need themselves.

    Contrary to popular belief, what china imports the most is actually electronic components. Followed by fossil fuels.

    Those two categories alone account for ~40% of all Chineese imports as of 2024.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago

    RAM is a commodity, so if this stuff is produced in large quantities, it will affect the global market by lowering China’s demand for imported RAM.

    Same as oil and gas, even if North America will never import Iranian product, their prices are affected by that stuff not reaching the market in Asia or whatever and driving up the Asian demand for oil elsewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    They won’t sell it to you

    China is a major consumer of RAM. If they can supply it domestically, that has the potential to reduce the volume of global imports and subsequent price pressure.

    If their competitors can't keep up, you will eventually see Chinese RAM get out onto the secondary market in the same way Chinese EVs and Chinese cell phones and Chinese solar panels and Chinese steel have depressed global prices for these commodities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    If their competitors can’t keep up

    Their competitors have already sold out their entire 2027 production.

    The money they make selling RAM to private consumers is not even 1 promille of their revenue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Their competitors have already sold out their entire 2027 production.

    Plenty of which will inevitably turn up on the secondary market.

    The money they make selling RAM to private consumers is not even 1 promille of their revenue.

    The RAM they sell to home-labbers and hobbyists, sure. The RAM they're selling to Dell and Lenovo and Apple? A significantly higher chunk of their revenues. But that's a side issue. These kinds of RAM sticks are largerly fungible.

    The new high end AI datacenters are building out specialty hardware that isn't PC compatible. And the real worry is that these firms migrate over to the AI datacenter designs in a way that causes a semi-permanent shortage on the independent PC side.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Interesting. I have heard that hardware manufacturers create specific chip architecture to suit AI technology.

    Though I had not considered that the hardware might shift so much as to be rendered "useless" for the average consumer

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    What about all this other Chinese crap I own?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    You see, that is in your own words crap, they keep the good stuff for themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    There is some decent Chinese stuff. Sometimes it's hard to know though with the flood of crap. For example Anker seems consistently decent, but anything that sounds like Qihoon or Xiyomao or whatever random brand word they pop into existence on the other hand...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    they keep the good stuff for themselves.

    Do they? If anything, I believe China's been exporting the high-end luxury items because they have absurd margins in western markets. Meanwhile, the good-enough goods stay at home, because it isn't worth the time or effort to sail them across the ocean and market them.

    I guess Temu and its peers have changed that, to a degree. But so much Temu crap just gets bought up by local American drop-shippers, marked up to American prices, and rebranded as western equivalent merch that it feels like much the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Hehe.. Go go China !! Crush those scamming mofo's from the US controlled sphere of influence..

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Competition is good. Two spheres of influence.

    Chinese sphere of influence is not good. Theirs includes the worst countries in the world, like North Korea, and Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    US Sphere of influence includes Israel, not exactly great TBH.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yep. At the current rate neither the Chinese nor American states will save us. Neither want democracy or liberty for the average person and value control over any other moral principle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago*

    Yeah, pulling the "America are good guys, China are bad guys" card at a time when America are unwavering allies and supporters of the nation who is openly doing in the XXI century the same kind of thing as the Nazis did, with equal levels of inhumanity and ultra-racist violence, doesn't have quite the same power as it did even a decade ago (though even then the whole Iraq invasion thing had already showed the American "moral high ground" as being mainly a tall pile of mainly middle eastern corpses).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    Production of basic necessities and planning an economy is good. China build so many apartments they now have 90% home ownership instead of treating housing as a speculative asset. Now they caught up in high tech and in will be producing highest tech computer chips. And they are building nuclear power plants so you can actually buy AI tokens that do not contribute to the destruction of our world.

    Also North Korea is far less dire than depicted these days. I wouldn't want to live there but life expectancy is something like 74 years so overall it's probably far from the worst country on earth.

    You shouldn't trust the mainsteam western media or institutions about any of this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago
    [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    And I‘m sure Chinese data centers are very happy about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    I mean if you do need / have to use AI, you can buy tokens from China that use nuclear power plants. There should be a boycott for all AI providers that do not primarily use solar or wind or nuclear. With that branding China could literally outjerk the west in greenwashing lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    26 comments in c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca view that post