It's No. 1 in percentage of Nazis, though.
post
Entire Fediverse on that chart would be 1.4, according to https://fediverse.observer/stats&months=12
Fediverse monthly active users has been going down. I’m starting to notice my Mastodon feed not having the people I follow anymore, because of they consolidated their alternative social media in Bluesky only.
Wow, to fall behind Pinterest is quite an achievement (derogatory)
The only "social network" my teenager has asked permission to make an account on is Pinterest.
I was a little confused at the request, because in my mind Pinterest was a defunct site that no one used, but apparently it's popular with at least some of the younger generation.
I've come around slightly on Pinterest. Not fully--it's still vapid and there's a lot of attempted lock-in--but there is some good stuff on there, and its attempt at curating creativity is kind of refreshing.
kids use it as a backdoor to access TikTok/Youtube shortform content.
I assumed it was a dying platform but then I found out why it's so popular again - kids uae it as a backdoor to access TikTok/Youtube shortform content.
For some reason Twitter specifically is like black tar heroin to politicians. Even post-Musk, left wing politicians like AOC and Bernie are still giga active on the platform.
Why do people still use the Nazi pedophile app
Good riddance honestly.
Even when Jack was managing that shithole it was still a shithole. Magnitudes better than the nuclear wasteland it is now but a shithole none the less.
Btw the embeddedscience.org article you linked is, at least partly Ai generated.
...
Pinterest is a social network?
I kind of feel the same about YouTube, but I do know they have comments at least…
🤔 Even after reading the "Why YSK" section, I still don't know what to do with this information. Maybe I'm missing something that should be obvious? I've never been much of a social media guy
I think a lot of people are struggling to make the switch because "everyone is on twitter". A YSK like this might help people see that it really isn't true, and you can absolutely make the switch.
Make the switch... to Facebook? Or Instagram? Because you might have noticed, fediverse (or even bluesky) don't even show up there...
Yeah, you raise a good point there. I am not a huge social media person either, so I was kind of under the impression that instagram would be at the very least a little bit better than twitter, but I concede that it's entirely based on vibes.
Maybe it's for advertisers or start-ups who want to figure out where the biggest audience is?
But then again, how do we know these numbers aren't just bots?
Guess it's a weird side thing for me. On the one hand, I probably won't use this knowledge for anything, but I'm glad to have heard it, if nothing else. Weird.
No, if you don't use it, you're not missing anything.
It's the users, advertisers, investors and politicians, who should know if they still believe it to be an important platform.
Its a self-suck fest for people who think of themselves as being "in media"
The difference is every journalist in the world is addicted to twitter and everything spoken or written about in the news is just what they were talking about on twitter yesterday
I love looking at stuff like this and not knowing what half of these things are.
I interviewed at a company in San Francisco that split an office space with Pinterest, and I casually asked during the interview if anyone actually uses Pinterest and the HR person said that the company I was interviewing with was moving to another location because Pinterest bought the entire building. This was a huge building in downtown San Francisco. I still don't know who uses Pinterest, but apparently a lot of people use it.
There has to be a massive overlap in the Meta communities but even so, they've probably got half the world's population feeding them data. That's pretty terrifying.
Twitter has American politicians, celebrities, press, and corporations, as well as world leaders and they all still use it to blabber publicly, so it doesn't need to cater the the proles.
Yeah, while it is draw for majority of people it is the reason I stayed away from it because the concept of social media brought to you by TMZ sounded like a nightmare. But, those who want to feel closer to celebrities or get the opportunity to go viral love it.
Might be overlap between those who like sharing personal things on social media, and those who don't see a problem with things like meta glasses due to finding the concept of not putting your entire life on social media bizzare.
Has anyone ever used pinterest on purpose
It's the accessibility factor that's important. It's called the "digital town square" not just because of the user count (which isn't high compared to Facebook or Whatsapp) but because of how easy it is to access. Musk's changed that and now you need to log in to see some (all?) xeets, but... most of the social media on that chart requires login and/or app, I think reddit is the most notable exception (or was, now they also require login to use the web frontend I guess). But then reddit requires you to actually click on the posts, which is more effort, whereas xitter just shows you everything in your feed, so if a politician or celebrity's xeet is in it, you're seeing it.
Idk, there's just something about it that screams it's better for announcements and such than most other social media platforms.
Is there any actual 3rd party verification of the users or is it just "trust me bro!"?
These things are notoriously difficult to measure accurately, but this is from Statistica Statista, which has a reputation for pretty good metrics. At the very least, one would expect their metrics to be comparable across the analysis, if not necessarily a perfect measure of absolute numbers.
Edit: thanks for catching the typo.

all 50 comments