Fediverse memes

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

I want to see if this small human still looks this angry when they grow up

parent

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 months ago

[–] X@piefed.world 29 points 3 months ago*

Cuz I'm a bad ass motherfuckin' DJ
This is why I walk and talk this way!

[–] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 27 points 3 months ago (8 children)

I work with computers and I have no idea what I am looking at here. Anyone have some context?

hideshow 8 child comments

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 3 months ago (6 children)

It's not computers, it's the latest drama here in the Fediverse.

Big frontend called Tessarect did a sneaky.

They made a hidden shadow-ban list of instances, users, and phrases, keeping it secret from users and admins by not including it in the open source code and instead loading it at runtime, and added in there all non-centrist (instances, users, and phrases) they could think of. They also lied about it, by claiming it to be a technical issue, when any user looked for the banned instances from the front-end, instead of calling it what it is, a targeted exclusion.

Essentially, hidden censorship, and sliminess.

To the degree that some people, (like OP here), have taken it as a badge of honor, that they are among the ones banned by name, in that list.

And some other people, are definitely not jealous.

hideshow 6 child comments

parent

[–] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 16 points 3 months ago

thank you kindly!

parent

[–] farngis_mcgiles@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago (4 children)

so the same thing piefed did?

parent

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Huh, haven't heard about that drama, what happened?

hideshow 3 child comments

parent

[–] farngis_mcgiles@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

piefed has hardcoded blocks for instances the dev doesn't like

parent

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

Which are only blocked if the admin specifically asks for them to be.

In other words not hard-coded at all.

PieFed is quite opinionated, and the instance picker even more so, but the "hard-coded" arguments have long since been debunked (though last I checked, without being acknowledged by those who initially spread the story).

Also the flagship instance PieFed.social does block a lot, but that's as different as an instance is from software. Btw Lemmy.ml rather famously blocks a lot of content as well.

Whatever software you use, pick good instance admins that you feel reflect your values (or even self-host your own), and you'll enjoy your experience on the Threadiverse much better than being at odds with them.

parent

[–] ragingHungryPanda@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 3 points 3 months ago

I follow along a lot in the chats and run the software. They did move everything to configuration a long time ago.

parent

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world [S] 36 points 3 months ago

parent

[–] lonefighter@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 months ago (4 children)

We should award everyone on the list with a badge next to their username the same way new users show up with a chick next to theirs.

(I am not currently on the list and I am slightly salty about it)

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago (1 child)

Hm, maybe I'll use my fork of tesseract to add a shiny badge next to those names instead

parent

[–] Salamence@mander.xyz 2 points 3 months ago*

gold-antifa Medal for only certified TRUE posters

parent

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world [S] 19 points 3 months ago*

(I am not currently on the list and I am slightly salty about it)

parent

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

new users show up with a chick

With at what now?

parent

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

What's up my homies!

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago*

Yo, me too. But not MonkderDritte, so it's relatively recent.

parent

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus 42 points 3 months ago

Ayyy I made the list 🥳. Honestly it feels like almost the whole-ass threadiverse is on the list 😆

[–] raspberry_confetti@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago (1 child)

Just fucking rub it in

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

1000004358

parent

[–] grillgamesh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 months ago (6 children)

what the heck is this?

I leave for a few days and the memes have changed from beans to...... this.?

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] Limitless_screaming@kbin.earth 27 points 3 months ago (4 children)

There's a popular frontend for Lemmy called "Tesseract". About a week ago the dev pushed an apparently malicious update with a block list which contains lots of leftist (as in even slightly left leaning) communities and users.

OP searched for and found his username in that block list.

The file OP searched in is "policy.json", which doesn't exist in the source code. The command pulls the content of the url decodes it from base64, unzips it and puts the content in policy.json. Which means the source code obfuscates the file by default.

(the only file called "policy" I could find in the source code is a .dat file which has the encoded data).

parent

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 11 points 3 months ago

lots of leftist

Apparently they just blocked whoever didn't agree with the devs, it's mainly leftists but there are some rightist too, they blocked the word "Enlightened centrist" so the devs are for sure enlightened centrists and blocked whoever isn't

parent

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

lol and they just closed sourced it.

are they breaking licensing laws now?

@ptz@dubvee.org if you're going to shit on the community, at least have the decency to stand by your work.

parent

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

The author explains himself here: https://lemmy.world/post/49817942.

Like apparently it's not "leftist" per se (or trans or furry etc.) so much as extremist rhetoric, or even instances turning a blind eye towards same, for the sake of mainstream normies coming here from Reddit.

It would be like blocking pretentious people, then vegetarians decrying unfair/biased treatment.

Note that many leftists are not blocked, like I strongly doubt that slrpnk.net would be, it's primarily the more "militant" varieties.

parent

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 months ago

Dude is a grade A pussy. He can have his opinions and make his decisions but to close his eyes and cover his ears and go "lalala" is hilarious.

parent

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 0 points 3 months ago*

Next up I think is jeans (again), or are we all the way back to not pooping?

parent

[–] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 child)

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 3 months ago

So big on the weird part of the internet they had to update they software

parent

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

If I post trans memes monthly and study das kapital every day, will I make it to the list next year? I don't want to un-disappoint my parents!

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world [S] 13 points 3 months ago

parent

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 months ago*

I am both glad and sad I'm not on the list. UwU

From the looks of the list, basically nobody I can recognize, the people behind the list ( if it wasn't just the dev alone ) really has a hard on for a lot of people.

Same thing for website as well. A lot of sites that have either some genAI features or are about genAI/genAI tools or are genAI slop coded to the extreme. Actually fine with that because fuck genAI. But also gumroad, bit(dot)ly, wixsite, ceilingsanddryliningsupplies(dot)co(dot)uk ( literally looks like a completely innocent businesses website ), another innocent looking store ( distinctive Chesterfields ( furniture ) ), linktree, google forms & gemeni, and a lot more are also on the list.

The list feels all over the place and as nutty as can be.

[–] Daxter101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 months ago

Omfg stop showing off! I'm getting jealous, I'm almost certainly not in there, and I'm feeling left out!

(/j)

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago*

Okay, jealousy unlocked. Well done!

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Shall wear it with pride.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

1000004357

I wondered why I was getting less interaction recently 🤣.

[–] Cheebus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Time for some good ol fashioned 1TropicalDingdong

(if i’m reading that regex correctly)

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world [S] 7 points 3 months ago

parent

[–] four@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

^ means the start of the text, so you can't add anything before. But it ends with any number of digits, so TropicalDingdong1 it is

parent

[–] Cheebus@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 child)

Right so if it’s a blacklist 1TropicalDingdong would go right around it

parent

[–] four@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

Oh right haha I thought you wanted to join the cool kids club of blocked names instead

parent

[–] pleb_maximus@piefed.zip 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Ayo, my lemmy.zip account made it in. Guess I wasn't trying hard enough on this one. :D

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] Mim@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I really did! :D

parent

[–] pleb_maximus@piefed.zip 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

So you should add me to your blocklist on your, what now seems to be closed source, UI @admiralpatrick@lemmy.world otherwise the "normies" might be exposed to my toxicity and violence. Chop chop, get to it!

Oh, but maybe tell the users that you have built in such a feature and let them decide on their own, it is generally considered toxic and dipshittery of the highest order to hide such things even from the admins and try to obfuscate it in the commits.

parent

[–] cookiecoookie@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

They're the first virus on Lemmy

parent

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Brag more, will you?

[–] Salamence@mander.xyz 4 points 3 months ago*

lenin-tea Looks like someone isnt a big fan of leftist articles, lol

But it was probably because of the feddit-dbzero drama post lmao

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 4 points 3 months ago

Is the decoded list published somewhere? For someone too lazy to do it themselves

[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

sigh

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A lot of people don’t belong in the list but I think you’ve earned your place.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world [S] 13 points 3 months ago (1 child)

Telling everyone you don't get it without telling everyone you don't get it.

parent

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 5 points 3 months ago

I don’t get much I’m pretty slow.

parent

[+] Kirk@startrek.website -26 points 3 months ago (13 children)

hideshow 13 child comments

[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 23 points 3 months ago (11 children)

That's not the issue. Admins running the UI and other users didn't know this was in it.

hideshow 11 child comments

parent

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world [S] 14 points 3 months ago*

literally 1984 i literally cant even omg

parent

[+] Kirk@startrek.website -10 points 3 months ago (9 children)

truly impressive how some people are always the victim even on open platforms they literally can own for free

hideshow 9 child comments

parent

[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Well yeah, people are changing frontends and warned others that Tesseract has that kind of blocklist and they don't support it. If people that used the tool didn't find out until now, it's mostly a communication issue from the dev. And to the user that knows none the wiser, opinions that they would've accessed if not for using Tesseract are essentialy not available. The option to turn it off is essentially hidden, and the user can't find out that information is being blocked (as seen by the reaction it caused in the threadiverse). It's censorship by omission of information. Even if they had good intentions, the way they went about it failed to communicate what the blocklist was about, and that information was being blocked in the first place.

It's also just kind of a silly thing to implement in a client. That's the perspective the memes are coming from. Usually, blocklists should be left to the instance administrators or users. The client should only easily allow such a list to be available.

hideshow 8 child comments

parent

[–] Kirk@startrek.website -5 points 3 months ago (7 children)

I'm sorry you were blocked but this behavior isn't likely to change that

hideshow 7 child comments

parent

[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I don't really know if I was blocked nor do I really care. I'm just explaning why people were upset/making memes about it. It's shocking once one finds out about the blocklist, but kind of funny in retrospect.