WTF?

Wouldn't this put added stress on personnel? To see if they measure up?

Also sounds like he wants soldier bodies to be like machines.

Or is it about some sexuality bias?

The proposal sounds obscene to me.

all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 12 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

The solution will be steroids, which lead to angry behaviour and allows the soldiers to do heinous, unconscionable acts during their "'roid rage" phase. Addicted soldiers are the most loyal soldiers for the one who feeds them their juice. War. O, discordia!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Military has a long history of hardcore drugs. There is an infamous history of WWII militaries using amphetamines (esp. in Allied militaries) and methamphetamines (in Axis militaries, brand name Pervitin) as performance enhancing drugs. You want a sneak peak into what Discordia's drug-dazed war has in store? Just ask Aimo Koivunen

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 months ago

    I agree with eureka and just want to add that drug-funded or drug-spurred wars, large and small, have been around for at least two thousand years. One would like to think that we would be beyond that by now but perhaps not. If you're interested in the topic, this article gives a general overview of modern times use: https://knowablemagazine.org/content/article/society/2019/war-and-drugs-together-forever

    This one looks at drug use among Germanic warriors during Roman times: https://scienceinpoland.pl/en/news/news%2C105776%2Cbarbarian-warriors-took-stimulants-battle-says-new-research.html

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago*

    I am certain this won't be abused and there will be no ill effects to worry about.

    EDIT: The ole' Secretary of War doesn't seem too bothered by gender affirming care...for CIS men.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago*

    fascist-leaning (small f) ideology has an obsession about their own unique concept of masculinity, including plenty of pseudo-science. One of the most striking cases is in food, where on the more extreme levels, infamous grifters (who are clearly lie about their own diet) pitch a cure-all "carnivore diet", or soy avoidance (supposedly increases estrogen; it doesn't), or raw milk drinking (I've heard a report that the NSN partake in this, along with other unlisted diet restriction). But on a lesser level, this filters down into a pseudo-scientific misinterpretation of proteins in fitness communities which has entered into our mainstream shopping experience.

    Why Don't Fascists Eat Vegetables? is a very insightful watch. (The downside is the whole deep-dive is 6 hours long, but even watching sections is insightful)


    I also wouldn't be too surprised if this is just posturing to the public, who may be concerned about of reports about the loosening fitness standards under previous regimes in a desperate attempt to try and boost falling military recruitment. But it's also obviously related to fascistic ideas of traditional gender, and the scapegoating of not just trans people, but also cis people who just aren't 'masculine' enough (yes, we know, they're hypocrites, it's obvious).

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    sounds like a precursor to gender affirming care to me

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    I wonder if this make-up wearing never done a hard day's work in his life person will have his testosterone levels checked ?

  • source
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 months ago

    From Meidas Touch - Hegseth COMPLETELY NEUTERED by Military Vets after BIZARRE Announcement https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHldJls5y6s A lot of interesting commentary about Hegseth's announcement, especially its effect on Gen Z young men.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    This is typical Republican projection. Hmm, my testosterone is low so I'm going to force everyone else to get tested before anyone finds out.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Confirmation this loser has moobs.

  • source
  • Literally socialist gender-affirming care

  • source
  • 39 comments in c/nottheonion@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 124 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Sounds like gender affirming care to me.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 60 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 49 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    So now he's in favour of HRT?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Only for manly men. And if you call it something else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    What about the mental deficiency of the President? No?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    JFC that guy is a caricature of a comic book villain

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 months ago

    This is a ride to start using "guidelines" to start juicing up the troops to insane levels.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 3 months ago

    What he thinks he's building: a supersoldier program. What he's building: a gender affirming care program.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Then it turns out that because pollution, cheaply made food full of hormones and pesticides and cheap plastic crap the levels are too low overall and the requirement disappears silently. They'll certainly not touch the cause of the issues.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    And the irony is that those same hormones and pesticides are probably at least partially responsible for the increasing numbers of the trans and queer people they hate so much.

    Long explanation of trans neurology:

    spoilerI'm trans myself, and I get why this is a touchy subject in the trans community. Many folks get deeply offended if you even try to talk about the "cause" of being trans, or flip out if you discuss the idea of neurology. But unless you want to believe in a soul, we are material beings. Everything I am, including my gender identity, is produced from the physical structure of my brain. There are some trans folks that take it way too far (self described "trans meds"), sometimes trying to use such neurological arguments to rank the validity of various trans folks. ("If you're happy with your original parts, you're not really trans!") And that's bullshit. But other trans folks sometimes overreact badly to this, and end up flipping out at anyone even mentioning the neurological roots of gender dysphoria, throwing around "trans med" as a hateful slur against anyone even suggesting a physical cause of transness, as if there could be any other cause of it.

    I view being trans a kind of neurological intersex condition. Basically, there's some part of your brain that maps to your body's physical structure and sense of self. You have an internal neurological sense of what shape your body is supposed to be. And trans people are born with a map of the opposite sex (or some intermediate state for NB folks.) And this also extends to sociology. Gender roles sure are culturally specific, they are a cultural construct. But the EXISTENCE of gender roles is not a cultural construct. Every culture and society has gender roles. Gender roles are a social construct. The existence of gender roles is not - that's just part of universal human nature. What specific form these roles take varies wildly through time and cultures, but their existence is a universality. And human beings recognize gender from birth.

    In short, whatever culture you're born into is going to have a collection of traits and behaviors they assign to males, another for females, and possibly some other gender options. And everyone is born with some innate sense of which bucket they belong in. Most males will naturally latch on to whatever the male-assigned norms of their culture are, and the opposite with females. But for trans people, whatever part of the brain that says, "you're a boy, you should model yourself on the other boys," just isn't built that way. Instead, you end up with someone born with one body, but a neurological structure instructing them to socialize and assimilate with the opposite gender.

    Essentially being trans is a neurological intersex condition. Some parts of the brain's structure are sexually dimorphic, and what you get depends on your genetics and what hormonal cocktail you're exposed to in utero. Add in a bunch of hormonal disruptors and hormone-like compounds into the mix? Well, trans people have always existed. We have evidence of trans people going back 4000 years. But that doesn't mean being trans lacks a cause. Even in a perfectly clean environment, natural hormonal fluctuations would mean there still would be trans folks. But since hormones control everything related to sex differentiation, I find it impossible that the compounds in our food and water aren't having some effects on the rates of queer people being born each year. I think most of the increasing number of trans folks in recent years is simply because people are more comfortable about coming out. But I also find it extremely unlikely that some of the increase isn't due to environmental factors.

    I know that this makes most trans people very uncomfortable. No one wants to feel that their identity and existence is in part due to some environmental effect. But frankly, such folks should get over themselves. We're physical beings made of atoms. We can discuss the environmental causes of social phenomena without applying a judgment to it. I don't care if my transness was in part caused by environmental pollution I was exposed to as a fetus. Regardless, it's simply who I am, the cause is irrelevant to my life. Hell, I would rather be seen by the public as some victim of environmental circumstance rather than a weird pervert. Neither explanation would be entirely correct, but at least people would be more accepting of trans people getting medical care in the earlier case.

    Anyway, sorry for the essay. This is a touchy subject in the trans community, and I needed to stamp on a bunch of disclaimers. (And some terminally online scold will probably still come out of the woodwork to scream at me for violating the Party line.)

    But I just find it so infuriating. The same Republicans that hate trans people so badly also vehemently oppose the kinds of environmental protections that would honestly probably reduce the rate of trans people being born.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Thanks for the explanation. I'm cis but an ally, so that's an interesting perspective that I can see merit in. Understanding a possible cause for someone's 'differences' does not reflect on their worth in any way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I am just waiting for the day we find out there is a new Penile Length& Girth Requirement so that Secretary Hegseth finally gets the military he wants and deserves.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Pete does boner inspections on every base he visits. Viagra is mixed into the food.

    To be real though it seems a bit invasive for the government to control the hormones in your body

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    Well, here's hoping that at least trans men get the hormones they need to perform optimally on the battlefield...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago

    Appreciate that you mean well, but it’s 2 words! β€˜trans’ is an adjective describing men

    Back on-topic, I highly doubt they give a damn about trans men. Not that I think they (or anyone) should serve in the military, but I digress.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago

    Well, Hitler gave his soldiers meth, so sHitler should give his some aggression hormone with help of his field marshal Heitelth.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago

    Are they making some sort of corellation between testosterone and propensity towards violence? Like a cartoon would?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    Alternative title: Pete Hegseth becomes trans ally, supports HRT. /s

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    HRT for everyone now!?

  • source
  • looks like we're heading back to eugenicists

  • source
  • Pete better be the first in line since excessive alcohol consumption can lower testosterone levels.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Are women going to also be tested? What happens when their levels come back low? Will they be deemed not capable enough to continue working?

  • source
  • every accusation is an admission

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    This is the best leadership he is capable of....

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    What a fucking loser. I can't even describe how pathetic he is when he tries to put on his tough face. Fucking cosplaying motherfucker probably got tea-bagged too often in CoD and now has to take it out on actual soldiers.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Good idea, they can goon even harder now.

  • source
  • 12 comments in c/politics@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] 31 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    So... Free gender-affirming care for service members?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 32 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I'm lost for words... What a fucking lunatic.

    What next? Issue Pervitin to US military personnel?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Just watch for Joe Rogan to talk it up

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    He's fallen off hasn't he? I just realized your comment is the first time I've seen his name in months

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    I think it's because he's started to cater less to the extremes.

    Many of these big grifters are "distancing" themselves from MAGA because they don't want to be held accountable when the administration eventually changes.

    Of course none of them have actually changed. They just want that paycheck at the end of the day

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    Your not supposed to be all jacked up on test your entire life you idiots.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    This Futher Mucker is nucking futs!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    So, yes to Manosphere pseudoscience, but no gender affirming care for trans troops.

  • source
  • And i assume he'll personally be administering the extraction. Orally.

  • source