top 71 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 104 points 4 months ago

The RAM I bought in 2019 for $100 is now over $500. at this rate I'll sell it in a few years to put my daughter through college.

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I've come to terms with the fact I'm not going to be buying any new computer-type devices until the bubble pops.

    I'm just terrified what happens if one of my existing devices breaks. If a RAM stick goes bad, I might have to mortgage my non-existent house.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 4 months ago

    In case you are being serious, there are ways around faulty RAM sticks, usually just a few cells/rows are affected. In case anyone needs to know this, here is a pretty good summary on stackoverflow on how to deal with this on linux. In general, look for "memmap".

    Keep your hardware running as long as possible! Iirc newer RAM is unfortunately somewhat more susceptible to failing. My DDR3 is still working fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    At this rate I'll be able to sell my ddr3 from over a decade ago and make a profit compared to what I paid originally

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    It's a good thing I saved the 24GB of DDR3-1600 from my old laptop. I might actually be able to get some money for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Suggested my wife to get mini pc with 32gb of ddr5 ram. If she would sell half of it today, she'd be reclaiming 60% of what she paid for that minipc.

    Originally I suggested her to get 64gb one so I could swap mine 32 with hers. She ultimately decided to not to. Could've been like 80% if she'd sell 32gb today. Crazy...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    I see this as an opportunity to get invested in non-tech hobbies because there’s nothing else I can do

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Mini painting, get addicted to plastic crack. Seems to be cheaper than tech hobbies these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Get a resin printer and you can print infinite minis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    That would probably be too close to a tech hobby and considering what some of the tech giants are doing. 3D printing will be labeled under criminal activity

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 64 points 4 months ago (20 children)

    it will be ironic when consumers cant afford the end user devices needed to interact with the AI servers. House of cards??

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 127 points 4 months ago (17 children)

    Let me put on my tinfoil hat really quick.

    They want to kill personal computing. You don't need a full blown computer, you need a fire stick style device that plugs into your monitor and allows you to remotely access the virtual machine you rent from Microsoft on a monthly basis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    this has been “the plan” since 2005. when i was in high school trying to figure out what the heck “cloud computing” was, this is what they were talking about: anything requiring more compute than secure authentication and pixel drawing would be rendered in the cloud and delivered to dumb terminals. this is what netbooks, Chromebooks, and smartphones have been a step towards if not an implementation of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    Looking back at computing history, cloud computing is basically reverting back to the original mainframes and dedicated terminals.

    There was a hype of using thin clients, the concept is that you get just enough hardware and software to be able to connect to a session running on a shared server, the admin can allocate more resources like CPU cores, RAM and storage as individual needs change over time.

    As an IT guy, I do like the concept in a corporate environment, especially when looking at the SunRay system from Sun, which used smartcards for easier access, you put your card into the client and if configured properly, you got your old session loaded and ready in a few sec, regardless of which client you put your card into.

    The YT channel Clabretro has several interesting SunRay videos.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

    Yup, there's a cycle between centralization and edge. Started with centralization, mainframes, went edge with the first PCs (and game consoles) and ever since corpos have been trying to pull it back to the center in waves. Thin client, cloud compute, arguably phones (as apps processing in the cloud), Geforce Now, AI. So far it's always gone back to the edge for most of the population, except for niche cases (or not in the case of phones). As internet gets faster and more reliable the chance of it sticking longer in the central zone increases (IMO).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    As internet gets faster and more reliable the chance of it sticking longer in the central zone increases

    It also allow the opposite, the fediverse is a living example of it, the more internet is faster the more we can organize better to decentralize, it's harder that someone get in contact with the decentralized internet but it's more probable that it happen now than 7 years ago

    Some companies also would still continue to sell consumer hardware (like Framework, probably)

    I see it as a fight, companies are currently winning sadly but we have the power to win too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Heartily agree. I was trying for objectivity, personally you'll take my general purpose computers from my cold dead hands, and I will encourage everyone I can to support it.

    I take some solace from the general pendulum nature of the process (and societal evolution in general), this too shall pass. Doesn't mean we don't need to fight. Evil triumphs when good people do nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    As an end user with this model at work, I hate this slow-ass shit that keeps freezing on me and randomly disconnects. Not fun or productive when it starts talking seconds to register a click because the connection becomes unstable for no apparent reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    It sucks that the world we live in is the way it is because in theory this would be an ideal model for so many people. Older adults I know really just need a Facebook terminal but are required to buy a whole computer. If anything at all goes wrong with it they freak out and buy a brand new one. So much tech waste and so much hardware not being used for the majority of the time. If they had lightweight terminals there'd be less issues on their end but even if they replaced it at the first issue, it wouldn't be an entire computer getting trashed. Since all they use is the occasional facebook the mandatory internet thing wouldn't even be an issue. Plenty of younger people might also be good candidates for this since they basically exclusively use online features too.

    Obviously I would never trust this kind of service for a variety of reasons, but in theory the world could really benefit from that model.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    Product idea: personal mainframe.

    Imagine a desktop small enough to fit in a backpack. It has a battery, a cell connection with data, decent GPU ram etc. Your phone is now just a display and a battery. Your laptop is the same but a bit bigger and with a keyboard.

    Each electronic device you own is now just a terminal used to access your mainframe. You can take your mainframe with you or leave it at home. It’s yours. You don’t rent compute from someone else.

    Would be amazing to have truly thin and very portable devices.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Yes, but they can get away with a tiny amount of it. Perhaps we are back at the start of personal computing and arcade machines era, where every byte counted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Yes, but they can get away with a tiny amount of it

    Not really. Developers have forgotten how to write small, efficient code. Everything is a web page these days, and so the bare minimum app is a web browser, and a web browser is huge.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    This is 100% the plan. Also, I would not be suprised if in 5-10 years there are legal limitations on what kind of computing capacity a private person can purchase due to “national security” reasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Man, this makes me want to take stock of what I have in the attic. Those old computers dont sound so bad any more.

    I also wonder if I should be hoarding raspberry pi and building some kind of cluster

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Thought I could wait to build a new PC, but at this point, it'll be another 5-10 years before things start getting better. After the price of the steam machine, I ordered parts to build my own. Such a bad time to build, but it's just gonna get worse the longer I wait.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    If they get better. By the time the AI sector collapses under the weight of its own bullshit, things will have already gotten significantly worse. You’ll be less worried about RAM prices and more worried about bread prices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Don't worry you might get $25 in a class action for bread price fixing. I think there should be a class action against the manufactures of Ram and hard drives. Most companies scale up when they have more demand, these fucks ain't, theyre pulling a classic OPEC

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I am figuring on selling off my previous machine once the teething issues with the new one has been resolved. Given these specs, what would be a fair price, Lemmings? I was guessing around $2,250 without the drives, but I am not really on the pulse of the market.

    00000

    • CPU = Ryzen 5950x + Noctua heatsink with Kryosheet.

    • PSU = SeaSonic Vertex GX-1200

    • MOBO = Crosshair Hero VIII + WiFi

    • CASE = Rosewill Thor V2

    • RAM = DDR4 3600, 128gb total, came as a kit of 4 sticks.

    • STORAGE (OPTIONAL) = x2 to x5 4tb SSD SATA drives, non-NVME.

    00000

    The biggest issue here is doing an RMA on the CPU. It is unstable when PBO is enabled. Since I suck at techno surgery, I wouldn't be able to install the replacement without forking over money to a technician. Maybe I can make that contingent on buying at least 2 SSD SATA drives?

    My new machine has only 4 SATA ports, and the SATA card to support all five SSDs and the optical disc drive is taking up a GPU slot. Being able to buy some 2280 M2 drives would solve that problem for me. That would gel nicely with a technician handling the transfer of the SATA SSDs back to the old machine for the new owner, since the tech can also get the M2 and a third GPU into my new PC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I just bought a new pc with a top end Gigabyte MB, a 9950 X3D, Seasonic TX 1300, noctua cooler, PTM, and 48gb 6400 DDR5 for $2500, I would not pay 250 less for the extra DDR4 RAM and generally worse specs.

    I'd re-look at current pricing and reassess.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The ‘AI’ angle is purely cover for the manufacturers actively choosing to now behave like the pharmaceutical industry. They’ve identified a window to pull this shit, and coordinated this opportunistic collusion.

    The only meaningful response is to create a diverse production base to remove the choke point the current incumbents are leveraging, but that would require a concerted, collaborative effort by parties who can’t see and/or don’t understand the problem.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    To play devil's advocate; it might be that the RAM producers see AI as a bubble, and it would be incredibly risky to expand their production now, when it won't come into effect until a handful of years from now.

    RAM and SSD manufacturers have already seen many many dips and rises in price over decades.

    However, that all of them are deciding not to expand and potentially rake in the cash is more than a little sus.

    I'm not sure how to feel about it personally. I hope the true cost of maintaining these AI models gets passed down to customers soon so that it either crashes and burn, or at the very least stabilises the market.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago*

    These price gouging assholes should probably be prosecuted along with the "AI" fraudsters.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

    Things are probably going to get worse in the short term, but the AI bubble is going to burst. Magnitude? We'll see, but when investors realize that these companies cannot make a profit, and open source frontier models that allow you to run AI in house are removing vendor lock in, things are going to change. Also, LLMs are a dead end, and have little room to improve.

    Newer paradigms are appearing, such as Yann LeCun's JASP, which actually learns, and other approaches, which will make LLMs obsolete, and are way less hardware intensive.

    Another factor is the Chinese closing in in consumer grade RAM. If it can be proven that no backdoor or other shenanigans are there, they will balance things somewhat.

    While current reality is what it is, there may be a massive social and traditional media manipulation by the big three and other interested parties to fuel fear of rising prices forever, to push people to buy as much as they can at these prices. I have no proof of this, but I don't think it's far fetched.

    And let's not forget that for media outlets, fear and tragedy sells. (I think Hearst or some other news mogul said that last century.)

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Yann LeCun's JASP

    Wait, this is my first time reading about this. Got an ELI5 or TL;DR?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Courtesy of Kagi's search AI:

    000000000

    It appears there is a slight misunderstanding of the acronym: Yann LeCun’s architecture is called JEPA (Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture), not JASP.

    JEPA differs from Large Language Models (LLMs) primarily in how they learn, what they predict, and how they represent the world. While LLMs are "word models" designed to generate sequences of tokens, JEPA is intended to create "world models" that understand the underlying physics and logic of reality 3 4 .

    The key differences are summarized below:

    1. Generative vs. Predictive (Non-Generative)

      LLMs are Generative: They operate by predicting the next token in a sequence (generative AI) 2 . This approach often leads to hallucinations because the model focuses on statistical probability rather than factual ground truth 6 . JEPA is Predictive: Instead of generating every single pixel or word, JEPA predicts latent representations (embeddings) in a hidden space 5 . It tries to learn what is "plausible" rather than attempting to reconstruct every single detail of the input.

    2. Word Models vs. World Models

      LLMs are "Word Models": They learn from text and treat intelligence as a language manipulation task 4 . LeCun argues that language captures only a small subset of human thinking and cannot represent high-dimensional physical spaces 2 7 . JEPA aims for "World Models": It is designed to understand cause and effect, physics, and the physical environment 1 . This allows the system to reason from first principles and plan sequences of actions, which is a prerequisite for autonomous AI 1 .

    3. System 1 vs. System 2 Thinking

      LLMs (System 1): LeCun describes LLMs as "System 1" processes—they are reactive and perform a fixed amount of computation to produce each token 2 . JEPA (Path to System 2): By incorporating world models, JEPA is intended to enable "System 2" thinking—the ability to plan, reason, and deliberate before acting 1 .

    Summary Comparison Table Feature Large Language Models (LLMs) JEPA / World Models Core Goal Predict next token (Text/Code) Predict latent state (Reality/Physics) Method Generative (Pixel/Token by pixel/token) Joint Embedding (Non-generative) Domain Linguistic/Statistical patterns Physical/Causal understanding Weakness Hallucinations, lacks physical grounding Limited fluency in natural language Cognition Reactive (System 1) Planning/Reasoning (System 2)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 28 points 4 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Yep, definitely not buying any new computers any time soon. If anything breaks I’ll try to live with it as much as I can.

    Fuck this pricing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago
    [–] 10 points 4 months ago

    I'm really glad I got my steam deck last year when I had the chance.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    No reference to CXMT’s memory that’s just starting to be sold in western markets now, I’m very curious if/how that’ll affect things. If corsair’s cxmt kit can hold pricing steady, let alone drop it, for a 2x16 6000MHz CL36 kit then it could be huge

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago

    Yeah there's a lot of doom here, but I keep saying that there are reasons that they are locking in 5 year price guarantees, it's because they know it's going to crash back down, whether it be bubble or normalization or Chinese. It'll take some time, but it's not forever.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    Recent leaks suggest that Sony will either have to sell its upcoming PlayStation 6 console at a minimum of $960 or push the launch date back into 2028 or even beyond that.

    I seriously think that they should push it back to 2028.

    I think that Valve's making a mistake by not pushing back the Steam Machine to 2028 too, though at least for Valve, a hardware platform flopping isn't a big deal, since they don't rely on it alone to make sales.

    Or maybe I'll be wrong, and gamers will be significantly less price sensitive than they have been in the past. But my guess is that they aren't gonna be jumping on consoles with a pricetag that's that high. As I said before, the only console to be successful in the past that cost nearly that much in inflation-adjusted terms was the Atari 2600. Everything else failed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    Type shit that happens to me when I earn my own money

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    8Gb of ddr4 is $25 usd and 16Gb ddr4 sticks are going for about $75 usd goes up from there depending on speed.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (1 child)

    https://pcpartpicker.com/trends/price/memory/

    This has new 2x8GB 3200 DDR4 DIMMs being a bit over $200 at the moment.

    A year back, it was $50, but not now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    I recently paid $120 for 4x8gb 3000 DDR4 RGB DIMMs used on eBay so prices aren't totally insane just yet. Anything new is out of stock or close to it because DDR5 is/was the norm. It would probably be cheaper to buy server ram if you can get a board and CPU that can use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    It'll be ok. Just stop buying shit. They haven't needed new computers for years now they just act like they do. See windows 11 required hardware roll out. You think that is a new tactic? That is just them being overt about a practice that has existed forever.

  • source
  • [+] -13 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    You may hate AI, but it’s not the reason we are seeing RAM costs skyrocket.

    Looking at the manufacturing data and the historical strong-arm tactics used by Samsung, Micron, and SK hynix, who collectively control about 96% of the global DRAM market, AI just gives manufacturers the perfect public justification to stop chasing cheap bit growth, starve low-margin consumer channels (our RAM products), reprioritize wafers toward premium products (data center RAM), and force customers into multi-year contracts at shortage-era prices.

    Sure it lets them make more money off us, but they really love locking in these rates with their data center-based customers.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments