all 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 20 points 4 months ago

They're not wrong

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    This is a good time to remind people that if you install a custom ROM from https://xdaforums.com/ (that's where most instructions are at any rate), you can install a version of Android with no google services whatsoever, including no play store

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    only if your device is rootable unfortunately

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Not necessarily. LineageOS doesn't require root; just a compatible device.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    It also requires the boot loader to be unlocked, which is the same requirement for rooting a phone. Thus, you can only install LineageOS if your phone is rootable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Where is the motorola graphene OS phone? This would be a great day to launch.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    afaik this will be for corporations only and not sold to consumers directly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Oh, I hadn't heard that. Is that a common business model for phones?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago*

    i mean it has been a thing for sure, motorola builds the radio and wifi systems in cop cars for example. the phone part may be new but it seems to be of the idea "corporations may need privacy but consumers don't deserve it".

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (2 children)

    I just checked, since I run GrapheneOs, and had Google Play installed.

    I don't have Advanced Device Protection (or whatever).

    If course, I really never open Play Store anymore, anyway, and I don't let it run in the background.

    I went ahead and uninstallled it, just to be safe. Having anything published by Google on my devices just feels gross, now.

    Aurora store is better for obtaining Play store apps, anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 3 months ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    but a privacy nerd my producer knows of basically said it was quite insecure and just recommended using the regular Play Store regardless.

    Interesting!

    It sounds to me like they fell for Google's ad campaign against alternate stores. (Google has been in court for locking out competing app stores, and launched a campaign in response to try to convince others not to trust alternative stores.)

    Aurora, has exactly the same set of packages as Play Store, but allows anonymous connections and provides substantially more end-user privacy information.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Users deserve to know what's running on their devices.

  • source
  • 24 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 45 points 4 months ago

    This is such an overwhelming power grab in line with all the other crap they are currently pushing like disabling Manifest V2. The US urgently needs to ramp up their antitrust legislation, or else - if you extrapolate the current trajectories - they might soon be in a position where the US government has to do what google says and not the other way around

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Remember when Apple were supposed to be the bad guys and Google/Android were “one of us”?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (12 children)

    Is this something we can opt out of, like how we can for Play Protect?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    AFAIK you can only avoid it by using a custom ROM like GrapheneOS

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    My phone doesn't have any custom ROM support yet, so I guess I'm screwed? I love F-Droid, but this missive amounts to just ragebait for people who don't have Pixel devices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    Buy a phone that lineage os support then. Way more options than pixels. Pretty cheap used, you just have to accept one from a few years ago. and make sure that any required bootloader unlock from oem can still be done.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago

    Best way is to not include it in the first place by using another ROM. If that's not an option, you can always remove it via root. It may also be possible to use ADB/Shizuku to get rid of it, but Google could add checks to prevent ADB from removing it. Then again apps installed via ADB aren't subject to verification.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    You can buy a DeGoogled Android from Fairphone or Murena. Or if you have a Pixel, you can install grapheneos.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Or leave Android altogether and get a Linux phone. You'll have more control but it won't be as slick.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Its not just about being slick. Real functionality will be lost as well as the lost ecosystem of android apps. I think Jolla is trying to bridge this divide by providing some proprietary android layer.

    But yeah, mobile Linux is defintely the goal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    The implementation about to be done is actually just another smaller step to trying to be completely locked down.

    In the same way you have to go and allow developer options to install apks outside of the play store now, this new thing will take you a couple more clicks to enable it and have a one time 24 hour waiting period before you can install whatever you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    At first Google does plan to offer something called "advanced flow" that will let you install what you want. But this doesn't address the chilling effect for developers (some are just getting out of Android rather than registering and paying Google), or the censorship power it hands to Google to make "undesirable" apps harder to obtain and install. And there's no guarantee they won't just withdraw "advanced flow" one day.

    https://developer.android.com//developer-verification/guides/faq#advanced-flow

    The best way to avoid it is by installing an OS that doesn't include the developer verification component.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago

    For a long time I thought side loading was something special because it didn't say "installing software", so it must be some very special procedure that is required for mobile devices because of limitations or requirements with the hardware, right?

    Yeah no, it was just a made up marketing term to push people away from installing their own software on their own devices

    Fuck all big tech companies

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    What's going on? Why does it feel like every megacorporation have become completely openly anti-consumer? Yes, companies have always been shady and doing everything for profit, but at least they did it subtly and backtracked as soon as the backlash came. Now they're just shamelessly force feeding us spyware and "digital-only licenses revokable at any time".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    I think theres two aspects to it

    • social licensing - e.g. Google tries and gets away with X, so the others now perceive they're less likely to receive excessive pushback and are emboldened to go for it. This is why I feel there needs to be a pervasive and continuous push towards consumer rights - smaller cases can snowball quickly in the wrong direction, never so in the reverse.
    • share price driven margin pressure, a figurative ideal business that balanced perfectly its price/margins/costs against consumer demands/buying power would still be pushed to make graph go up and right - the usual enshittification argument.

    The first feeds into the second, once your competitor moves against consumer interests, C suites are/perceive they are then under pressure to match peers, else fall behind.

    Screwing over customers is baked into Capitalism, even more so with the current scale and concentration of a handful of business operating in a weak regulatory environment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • Adb won't work to disable/remove ADV?

  • source
  • 21 comments in c/technology@beehaw.org view that post
    [–] [S] 29 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    The hacker news discussion is surprisingly not bad. Very few Google stans coming in to shill for their corporate masters, and they're getting soundly ignored and downvoted.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Man, I just moved here from reddit and it's so refreshing to have actual intelligent discussion instead of being shouted down by bootlickers about how no one cares for your pro privacy opinion.

    It's not a bad thing to have a higher barrier to entry for the Fediverse

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Which mobile OS are you guys using? How well do they work? How do they compare to stock android?

    I'm thinking about flashing /e/OS over Android.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

    I'm currently using /e/os as there are no official custom Roms for my phone and they offer a GSI version (works on a wide variety of devices). For me it runs flawlessly, but I don't use any apps dependent on Google Play Services, so YMMV.

    I think their default apps are very usable and having MicroG on board for location services is pretty handy. Their contacts/calendar/note syncing via Murena also make the user experience quite seemless.

    I'd recommend it.

    Edit: If you have any questions about the OS, feel free to ask away

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Does things like gmail, google maps and g calendar work? If not, are there workarounds?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    I think installing the apps via Aurora Store and running them should definitely work. There might be issues with syncing them to your Google account though. You can add the account via MicroG (preinstalled) but since I have no experience with running GApps on /e/os I can't attest to how well this will work, if at all.

    You can install Lineage OS and add GApps though, if you're looking for a custom ROM but need extensive support for Google apps.

    Might I ask what's your incentive to switch to /e/os? Installing Google apps kind of counteracts the privacy aspect.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    This isn't new.

    How many windows app promised security, more ram, cleaning windows, etc...

    Only to be malware?

  • source
  • [+] -12 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    Beehaw is not the place for this kind of discussion.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Check his profile, as a tankie he has supreme authority on what goes on in other fediverse instances.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Tankie, the favourite derrogatory term for brain dead capitalist bootlickers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    What? You don't normally call capitalists "Tankie". That would be a weird insult for one, to say the least. Usually that term is reserved for a certain kind of pro-authoritarian "communist" (in quotes of course because I don't believe it's actual communism).

    Anyway, not sure what any of this has to do with the post. What a weird comment thread...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago*

    Which is why you came here, to beehaw, to engage in the discussion that was already in progress without your permission? Honestly, how dare we!

    I wouldn't dream of coming to your home instance and telling you what topics you can/cannot have there...

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    lol is it the new version?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Man, this steams my broccoli. It does nothing but give Google veto power over applications, and the sideloading "exception" is a stupid 24 hour wait just to be dickheads.

    They don't give a fuck about security, they just want to remove adblockers in any nefarious way they can. Utter scumbags.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/opensource@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    We should probably understand attacker behavior rather than memorizing malware names

  • source