top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 134 points 4 months ago (9 children)

My lunch from home tastes the way I want it, and it cost less, and it’s better for me…sooo yeah.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    And most storebought "meals" are either way too small or made for multiple people

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I was born a man and identify as a man, but according to Stouffer's Lasagna, I'm a family of 4.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I love me some take out, but ever since I bought a massive jug of soy sauce from an Asian grocery store, I've been content with making my own stir fry at home. Simple, delicious, and far more affordable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    That was me and spring rolls. I got a good bottle of soy sauce and chili sauce at the Asian market they don’t sell anywhere else in town. I know they aren’t perfect but it saves a lot of money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 96 points 4 months ago (26 children)

    This is also happening with reproduction

    "Don't reproduce if you can't afford it"

    But also

    "Why are fertility rates falling into the abyss?"

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago (24 children)

    I mean why are birth rates always the highest in the poorest regions? Makes you think that money likely has little to do with reproductive rates, and more along the lines of women gaining education and having access to family planning methods.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 4 months ago (11 children)

    A lot of what people miss is the importance of safety and security. People don't have kids when they reach a certain income level. They have kids when they are reasonably confident they can give their children a decent living.

    A subsistence farmer in Subsaharan Africa can have a much more secure existence than the working poor of countries like the US. People are poor, but they live on land they own or at least have assured access to through shared community rights. They may not have much money, but they have security. They can have kids, and at the very least, the kids can always take over the farm from their parents. The parents probably want the kids to go get an education and be more successful than themselves, but at the very least, the kids will have no worse a life than the parents do.

    Compare that to developed countries. You pay monthly for rent that can skyrocket at any time, paid for with a job that can disappear at any time. And I would say raising kids in a rural African village is probably feels a lot more reasonable than trying to raise kids in a studio apartment built in a car-dependent American suburb.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Might be less that the subsistence farmer is so secure and more that they need the kids as a retirement plan. Most of the countries with falling birthrates have some sort of national pension for old people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    Sure, you could just make some shit up. That also works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    American? Would explain why you haven't heard of national pensions. Though I thought even Americans had Social Security.

    Or you mean the other thing? Dude that's exactly what we did here 150+ years ago. If you have a bunch of kids, they'll provide your upkeep in old age. Some will tend to the farm, others may help in other ways (get a job in a city or even abroad, send money back home).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Dude, that's a very dumb take..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Only if you confuse security with income.

    People have kids when they can reasonably assume that their kids will have the same level of lifestyle they do. People judge wealth relatively. They feel ready to have children when they can provide their children with a similar level of resources and opportunities they had. What barometer do people have other than their own childhood?

    That's not hard to guarantee as a subsistence farmer, as long as they own or otherwise have secure rights to the land. It's a secure but impoverished existence. Sure you're not immune from the weather, but that's true for both parents and children. "Let's have kids. Sure we don't live in a big fancy city, but if it's good enough for us, at worst it can be good enough for them."

    Compare that to wealthy people in developed countries. If you're a middle class person now and want your kids to have the same lifestyle you do, better be prepared to help them with the down payment on a house.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    It's obvious you're not a "subsistence" farmer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Perhaps you would like to contribute to the conversation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago*

    Fair.

    Farmers in developing countries have a lot less security. Why would anyone in their situation too want to bring a child into the world? If you look at the data, you'd see the lack of education of women is the best indicator for high fertility rate (and high mortality too). I honestly think those who are having more kids have it out of societal habit, and not based on feeling of security.

    To illustrate how insecure farming is, here's a story -

    The morning sky offers no promises. Kwesi rubs his calloused hands together, staring at the dry, cracked earth of his small plot in rural Ghana.

    For a smallholder farmer here, peace of mind does not exist. Every season is a high-stakes gamble against forces completely outside his control.If the rains arrive late, his maize seeds rot. If they come as a torrent, the topsoil washes away.

    There is no irrigation, no safety net, and no insurance. Even a successful harvest brings anxiety. Without cold storage, Kwesi's crops quickly spoil in the heat. He must sell immediately to aggressive middlemen who offer pennies, knowing he cannot afford to wait.But nature is not his only threat.

    The distant rumble of a motorbike makes Kwesi’s heart drop. To buy fertilizer, he had to bypass formal banks and borrow from a ruthless local lender. Now, with the harvest ruined by fall armyworms, the debt is due. The motorbike stops, and two men step off carrying heavy wooden clubs. They do not care about droughts or pests.

    "Next week," the taller man barks, kicking over Kwesi’s tools. "No money, and we take your land or your livestock. Or that pretty daughter of yours. You choose."

    They leave in a cloud of dust, but the terror remains. As his youngest daughter coughs in her sleep, a suffocating dread tightens in Kwesi's chest. He has no money for her medicine, and the enforcers are coming for his last remaining goats.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Poorer regions usually are more conservative too.

    Which means that women are more likely to stay at home taking care of the kids. And if they do work, they do so part time. Which still leaves time to take care of the kids.

    The regions with low birthrates usually have women working full time. And full time means 8h+.

    I bet people would be having more kids if people that can work from home, worked from home. And if full time meant 6h instead of 8h+.

    That way, instead of working husband + stay at home mom, we could have commuting parent and WFH parent.

    With the added benefit of commuting parent having a shorter commute since there would be a lot less people commuting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Nordic countries have lower overall working hours, and don't see increased birthrates. And make higher salaries. It's almost like when women become educated and have access to family planning methods, they don't have as many children.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    The poorest may reproduce the most because they are going to be poor either way, and they might also not have as much means to avoid it. But it is definitely a consideration for middle class people in developed nations who may have reasonably comfortable lives if they don't reproduce but will put themselves into hardship if they do.

    I think there's actually a bath tub curve with reproduction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Also, poorer nations tend to have less protections for children/youth in the labor sector, so having more children can be beneficial in that you can send all of them out to earn money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Send? Don't they yearn for the mines?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    This perception is largely overblown though, there is some difference but the poor in western civilisation still do not produce enough children on average to get to a sustainable population number.

    What might be a part of it is that globally the poorest region there is a lot of internal solidarity and community building.

    Helping each other out becomes second nature if it means that the neighbourhood will have your back during worst times. Forming the village to raise a child.
    Add other factors like normalised child labor and indeed no access to contraception or general healthcare (including normalised child death, my European great grand parents have also mentioned the concept of basically “backup” children and normalised loss of siblings)

    Some people migrating from such cultures may take some of it with them. People who raised around big families may want to replicate their image of a family but this seems to rapidly decline with each following generation.

    The west has a long history of living from exploitation. we build a culture around “civilized /s” families having wealth and became financially competitive. When things go bad there is rarely ever someone to help because either “i don’t have this problem so it must be your own fault” or “no one helped me when i was in that position”

    I don’t remember my latest source on this and i spend to long typing this to go look but the statistics i saw that showed that immigration is not the answer to declining population because they don’t produce enough kids either for sustainability was recent data from this year.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 110 points 4 months ago (22 children)

    Prices have skyrocketed, quality has tanked.

    Sorry, but I have a hard time buying a salad for $10 when I can grab the ingredients for 10 salads for about $5. And they'll be higher quality. Not browning lettuce with mayo sauce.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Sysco also is the food supplier monopoly. When you sign a contract with them you select what products they regularly stock for you to buy, and they heavily discount certain products they want to incentivize you to buy.

    It's why everything tastes the same now and a lot of restaurants do sysco slop bowls.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    It’s weird too because there is a burger place down the street from me that literally gets all of their ingredients locally. Buns from a local bakery, beef and potatoes from local farms, etc… A single patty combo with fries/tots and a drink is $13.79. Meanwhile down the street McDonald’s (I know McDonald’s doesn’t use Sysco but it’s the easiest burger comparison) is charging like $12.99 for a Big Mac combo that almost certainly has less beef in it and is nowhere near the same quality on any level in any capacity.

    We are reaching a point where corporate overhead is so huge that it might actually bring back small businesses.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 84 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    Would you like to leave a tip for the service of grabbing your pre-made salad from the refrigerator?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    You guys don't ACTUALLY get asked for tips at stores... Right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Nowhere that I've been, no, but the little POS tablets that small shops and vendors have all ask for a tip by default.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Not at grocery stores, convenience stores, or places like gas stations. Literally anywhere else that deals with food you'll get a automatic prompt at the register when you pay asking if you want to tip.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Seriously, why the fuck does a salad cost as much as a full meal? That's not an entree, it's an oversized side dish.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Always takes me a second to remember you Americans use entrée to refer to the main dish, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The word entrée sorta sounds like entry, doesn't it?

    It's more or less the same as appetizer or starter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 48 points 4 months ago (18 children)

    I’m not paying $22 for a burger. I can spend $6 on the meat, $4 on buns, $3 on blue cheese, and I have all the other seasoning and condiments at home already. That’s 4 blue cheese 1/4 pounders for $13. Or trade out the blue cheese for a handful of mushrooms and some Swiss for about $15 total. $15 vs $88 plus tip.

    They did this to consumers/the economy and now they’re complaining about the fallout.

    At this point I only go out for sushi. For obvious reasons.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    “So what you’re saying is we need to raise the price of beef?”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Already done, thanks to Elon unleashing the screwworm on the American cattle industry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    It’s delicious but not great for your health so we do beef maybe 1-2x a year. A good reason just to cut it.

    I feel bad for the cows. The worst part is Elon can afford to fix this problem but he won’t.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Holy shit and I feel weird paying more than 3-4 USD for a burger here in asia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    If you have an IN&OUT, its appeal/line is due to the fact that you can buy a plain burger for $2.50. If you like fast food. Was $2 in 2020.

    Sit down in a real restaurant, and it’s $19-$23. With fries.

    Granted, that’s still not as bad as paying the markup on pancakes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I've had a habit of going to fast food places on the weekend for a treat for having a rough week.

    I just decided to buy burgers, buns and I grow lettuce in my back yard ... I'm like, oh ... yeah, not sure why I didn't do this earlier.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Tomatoes pay out, and they’re not difficult.

    Strawberries multiply if you put them directly in the ground. Recommend Hoods, they’re amazing. Small, but punchy with flavor. Everbearing taste like Driscolls, even freshly picked. Again, not finicky to grow, and they’re perennial. Granted our temps don’t go below the 20s. Fahrenheit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    you can cook rice and slice fish at home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    No, it’s not the same. And I don’t trust me to prep or source raw fish for that, so it’s limited to veggies and cooked or smoked salmon at home. I finally have the rice how we like it after 6 yrs though. Also. If you know of an uncanned source of freshwater eel in the US, do tell. I’d like to buy it like any other fish, it’s delicious, but here we are.

    My point is, it only feels worth the money to eat our, as a very occasional treat, if it’s something not easily sourced or prepped at home. Like eel sushi.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 47 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Even if you donated all your money to billionaires and worked unpaid, they'd still demand more. The concept of 'enough' doesn't exist in capitalism.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Note the pattern of how the people at the top of the economy continually blame the people at the bottom of the economy for everything going wrong.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 70 points 4 months ago

    Shit happens. If restaurants were more fiscally responsible and lives below their means, they would have been prepared for something like this.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 4 months ago
    [–] 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Remember when fast food was fast food? Now you have to wait 10 minutes for your number and the things you overpaid for are barely describable as food (i.e. McDonalds CEO refusing to eat his own burger).

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    No, because McDonalds has been trash for decades, now they just raised their prices enough that people are finally noticing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    When a proper sandwich is 2,50 I don't mind paying at a restaurant. But when I have to pay 12,50 for a slice of bread with a single piece of cheese and some lettuce on it, I prefer to bring my own, thank you.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Don't forget the tip, otherwise the server will starve

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    I live in a country where hospitality staff makes fair wages. Although it could be better. But at least the responsibility for them making enough money isn't put on customers but on the employers, as it should be.

    At the place I worked at for a while we didn't do tips. There was no system for it. If people insisted on giving a cash tip, we (the employees) would use the money to buy food for homeless people. Everyone was happy with that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    fewer lunches than they did in 2020

    When everything was shut down and people were working from home? Wtf?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago

    Poor people should not be allowed to hoard wealth. Only wealthy people should be allowed to hoard wealth.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    16 comments in c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world view that post