doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.105.3.440

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

35 people makes it a useless study.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    it was 64 people. edit: and also, even 29 or something like this is a lot, assuming that they are selected kind of randomly and not all belong to the same social group etc. If only 3 showed a reaction like described, sure. We need more data. but with a hitrate of 100%, what do you expect to happen if you 10x the number?

  • source
  • parent