▲ 133 ▼ Most Canadians support social media ban for kids under 16: poll (cheknews.ca) submitted 7 months ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca 103 comments fedilink hide all child comments An Angus Reid survey says three-quarters of more than 4,000 respondents are in favour of a ban like the one in Australia, where youth under 16 are prevented from setting up accounts on TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat and Threads.
[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 7 months ago (8 children) We'll try literally anything but regulating big tech. permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] howrar@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago (2 children) Isn't a ban for kids under 16 also regulating big tech? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago To me, it's more regulating the behaviour of people than regulating the developers of intentionally addictive and intentionally poorly-moderated systems. The big hegemonic tech platforms, as they currently exist, are not just harmful to adolescents, they're harmful to society as a whole. I also don't enjoy the prospect of how a ban like this might be implemented in terms of age and identity verification, since I expect it's going look like "hand the data brokers even more of your personal data, they pinky-swear they'll only use it to comply with the law". permalink fedilink source parent [–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 point 7 months ago Not directly. Instead of reigning in big tech with legislation that would make social medias less harmful **for everyone **, politicians make a bullshit law that will infringe on people privacy even more and will be bypassed by any teenager with at least half a functioning brain cell. permalink fedilink source parent [–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 point 7 months ago the only country that can do that is the US, everyone else has to muddle through.. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Teppa@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (3 children) To accomplish what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 months ago (2 children) If you're being serious, proper taxation, proper intellectual rights enforcement, age enforcement, appropriate moderation of harmful content, limiting hate speech and promotion of Canadian content / artists similar to other mediums. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Teppa@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child) Oh, so like a censorship apparatus of some kind, to protect the children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 1 point 7 months ago Just to be clear Canada has clear legislation on hate speech and has for years. And frankly Im glad we have it to deal with piece of shit Nazis and shit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago (2 children) Isn't a ban for kids under 16 also regulating big tech? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago To me, it's more regulating the behaviour of people than regulating the developers of intentionally addictive and intentionally poorly-moderated systems. The big hegemonic tech platforms, as they currently exist, are not just harmful to adolescents, they're harmful to society as a whole. I also don't enjoy the prospect of how a ban like this might be implemented in terms of age and identity verification, since I expect it's going look like "hand the data brokers even more of your personal data, they pinky-swear they'll only use it to comply with the law". permalink fedilink source parent [–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 point 7 months ago Not directly. Instead of reigning in big tech with legislation that would make social medias less harmful **for everyone **, politicians make a bullshit law that will infringe on people privacy even more and will be bypassed by any teenager with at least half a functioning brain cell. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago To me, it's more regulating the behaviour of people than regulating the developers of intentionally addictive and intentionally poorly-moderated systems. The big hegemonic tech platforms, as they currently exist, are not just harmful to adolescents, they're harmful to society as a whole. I also don't enjoy the prospect of how a ban like this might be implemented in terms of age and identity verification, since I expect it's going look like "hand the data brokers even more of your personal data, they pinky-swear they'll only use it to comply with the law". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 1 point 7 months ago Not directly. Instead of reigning in big tech with legislation that would make social medias less harmful **for everyone **, politicians make a bullshit law that will infringe on people privacy even more and will be bypassed by any teenager with at least half a functioning brain cell. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 point 7 months ago the only country that can do that is the US, everyone else has to muddle through.. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Teppa@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (3 children) To accomplish what? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 months ago (2 children) If you're being serious, proper taxation, proper intellectual rights enforcement, age enforcement, appropriate moderation of harmful content, limiting hate speech and promotion of Canadian content / artists similar to other mediums. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Teppa@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child) Oh, so like a censorship apparatus of some kind, to protect the children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 1 point 7 months ago Just to be clear Canada has clear legislation on hate speech and has for years. And frankly Im glad we have it to deal with piece of shit Nazis and shit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 months ago (2 children) If you're being serious, proper taxation, proper intellectual rights enforcement, age enforcement, appropriate moderation of harmful content, limiting hate speech and promotion of Canadian content / artists similar to other mediums. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Teppa@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child) Oh, so like a censorship apparatus of some kind, to protect the children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 1 point 7 months ago Just to be clear Canada has clear legislation on hate speech and has for years. And frankly Im glad we have it to deal with piece of shit Nazis and shit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Teppa@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child) Oh, so like a censorship apparatus of some kind, to protect the children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 1 point 7 months ago Just to be clear Canada has clear legislation on hate speech and has for years. And frankly Im glad we have it to deal with piece of shit Nazis and shit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 1 point 7 months ago Just to be clear Canada has clear legislation on hate speech and has for years. And frankly Im glad we have it to deal with piece of shit Nazis and shit. permalink fedilink source parent