Its not. I wish we lived in a world where we could be trusted with things like this, but we dont.

I really want a camera on my face and a HUD so I can live life more like a video game with screenshots, but we as a species have shown time and time again that we can't behave.

Id rather nobody have one.

How is it illogical if it worked? It might be immoral, but there's a clear through-line of cause and effect.

Humans are illogical in most cases. It's something you have to put up with when living in a society.

I realized arguing with a dipshit like you was beneath me

Amid a second Trump presidency that is going very poorly is truly a wild time to start crowing about a person's rightful freedom to be dumb on purpose.

nothing is being dictated. surveillance is violence. if you harm me, maybe i will reduce that harm, also using violence. fuck around and find out logic.

Surveillance is a form of violence that those wearing the glasses are imposing on us.

facebook knowing my personal information against my will goes against my right to privacy. there are also the ethics of recording people in secret instead of making it very obvious. no, a blinking red dot does not count, and it can also be covered with a special purpose-made made black sticker.

now that i think about it, I'm just not comfortable being filmed without consent by strangers at all, in any way, regardless of where the images end up.

i don't think people should get used to it either. it's incredibly creepy, even if no law is broken where you live.

and yes, i do understand that in many places just being in public reduces your right to privacy so that you're legally allowed to be photographed as long as you're not the focus. i don't care. still creepy.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

*Unless Facebook does the unreasonable searching and we pay them for any data they collect

You do in Germany, except during events/gatherings/marches.

If I see someone filming me, I ask them to stop. That will escalate if they don’t.

I think what people are missing here is the intention. There’s generalised filming of your surroundings, surveillance cameras…these glasses are intended for use in a social capacity. That will move into privacy issues and perverted use.

These peoples right to use these glasses, as far as I’m concerned, does not eclipse my privacy or lack of desire to be filmed and put on Metas platforms and if I find someone using them on me they’ll be fucking told.

Bye, then

You mean you can't tell the difference between someone visibly recording you and someone recording you with a hidden camera? You feel like both of those are the same thing?

This only makes sense if you imagine rights are granted to you by your wise and benevolent king when he's in a good mood and no one else.

People with legal issues, immigration issues or violent exes will absolutely dip if they see someone recording. I have none of these problems and I will always avoid gettIng recorded by randos if it’s easy to do so. I can’t reasonably avoid every Ring cam in my neighborhood but I will happily slide 10 feet to the left to avoid becoming collateral damage in some dbags insta reel.

When you say "fascist", you do realize that fascism involves crowd control and these glasses are a dream for a fascist regime? All the speech about "cameras everywhere is ok" falls right in the authoritarianism thinking, that's just a step from fascism.

I think the real problem is that you don't seem to realize/care how gross and rapey you sound. That's... maybe something to work on.