Oh dear (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
 
Oh dear
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 96 points 1 year ago (32 children)

I...I can't tell if this is commentary about now or not. Is that bad?

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 104 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Neanderthals are representing anti-science right wing government here

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 112 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Comparing the US Nazis to Neanderthals is an insult to Neanderthals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    especially considering neanderthals were made extinct largely because of things like violence with homo sapiens, disease introduced by homo sapiens, the relationship (or lack thereof) with dogs, and climate change whilst the competitive advantages around social and cognitive development are relatively slight

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Neanderthals went extinct because they couldn't survive the ice age of 40,000 years ago. Unlike homo-sapiens, they never learned to sew, so they couldn't make tighter-fitting fur clothing to keep warm. They mostly wore loose-fitting animal hides.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Making fun of people's features is not really going to get us anywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Disagree. With Trump, for example, it's one of the proven ways to get under his skin. It's useful to know how to goad people who otherwise have no capacity for empathy, regret, etc..., in my opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    It undercuts their dignity. If people think you're a joke, they don't do what you say when you say to do something awful.
    We're dealing with fascists. They're a violent, angry pack of buffoons. We shouldn't cater to their feelings.

    For reference, see the works Chaplin, and Moe, Larry and Curly.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago* (18 children)

    I first read it as neanderthals are less aggressive so they must focus now on weapons. I'm pretty sure the intention is that the guys working on the wheel have to stop because the current leadership are neanderthals.

    I think neanderthals were less war-like than humans because humans eradicated all of them, but I'm probably reading too much into it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    I think neanderthals were less war-like than humans because humans eradicated all

    Akchually, Neanderthals were humans and we don't know why they disappeared. The idea that homo sapiens eradicated them all is probably a wrong one; their decline begun before the arriving of homo sapiens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The most recent suggestion I saw is that there were just more sapiens when they started interacting. Interbreeding must have happened, but with new groups of sapiens continuously arriving from the middle east, the neanderthal DNA just got more and more dilute. Eventually "pure" neanderthals no longer existed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    with new groups of sapiens continuously arriving from the middle east, the neanderthal DNA just got more and more dilute

    I can't tell if you're being serious, or making fun of the great replacement theory conspiracy...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Akchsually if you look at the genetic markers in modern populations its pretty clear what happened. πŸ†πŸ’¦ πŸ‘Ά

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    They ate egg plant, at which point there were heavy rains which did them in?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The combination of eggplant and deluge turned them all into babies. Unable to hunt or communicate, they were wiped out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Europeans and Asians also have roughly 2% Neanderthal DNA on average, so it's likely we absorbed a significant chunk of their population into our own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    We also might simply have outbred them. Remember that modern humans have what appears to be detectable Neanderthal DNA so interbreeding has apparently occurred; we might simply have diluted them into perceived extinction. Besides, there doesn't seem evidence for large-scale war.

    Of course that's all speculation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Huh I never thought about Neanderthals that way, but it makes sense. Crazy that now we refer to them as "less civilized" or more "savage", considering what war is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    To add to that, evidence suggests that, not only were their brains larger than ours, but they likely had a higher capacity to learn than we do. Not to mention them being bigger and stronger than us too. We most certainly were the savages. It seems some things never change.

    https://www.fortinberrymurray.com/todays-research/were-the-neanderthals-smarter-than-we-are

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    It's also known, from an invasive frog (cane toad) in Australia, that adaptation can occur due to rate of travel. I'm not sure that's relevant here, it's just another example of how we've found quirks of evolution.

  • source
  • parent