you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30 points 1 year ago (5 children)

We stand on the shoulders of giants etc etc. But it seems odd to me that they wouldn't think about using this for communication at least.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's not always immediately obvious to what end you can use a new innovation. For instance, the Romans discovered and built a steam engine. But nobody connected the dots that it could be used to power a train.

    To me, it showcases the main reason why we need to collaborate. Only together, we can exponentially increase the potential of everything we build.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Imagine industrial revolution Roman Empire, thank fuck they didn't connect the dots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Good for us as we wouldn't exist without the world going exactly as it has (I guess unless you're from a culture that didn't get conquered/settled and has been quite insular), but imagine where technology would be if industrial civilisation had been continuous from so early

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_radio

    By August 1895, Marconi was field testing his system but even with improvements he was only able to transmit signals up to one-half mile, a distance Oliver Lodge had predicted in 1894 as the maximum transmission distance for radio waves.

    I suppose beyond the engineering know how required they were looking at possible transmission ranges and thinking it simply wasn't practical, square law and all that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    This.

    There are often actual limits to what can be done, and there are practical limits. Especially in the early days of a technology it's really hard to understand which limits are actual limits, practical limits or only short-term limits.

    For example, in the 1800s, people thought that going faster than 30km/h would pose permanent health risks and wouldn't be practical at all. We now know that 30km/h isn't fast at all, but we do know that 1300km/h is pretty much the hard speed limit for land travel and that 200-300km/h is the practical limit for land travel (above that it becomes so power-inefficient and so dangerous that there's hardly a point).

    So when looking at the technology in an early state, it's really hard to know what kind of limit you have hit.

  • source
  • parent