you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The article goes a bit more in-depth than that. For example they show in my home region of metro Vancouver, the wealthy suburbs tend to have much higher rates of EV registrations than the core cities of Vancouver/burnaby/tricities/richmond/surrey or the less-wealthy suburban areas.

This data implies to me that beyond just infrastructure and travel requirements, cost is a major factor, perhaps overwhelmingly so. This too wouldn’t be groundbreaking news but it’s a different narrative to your conclusions here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    cost is a major factor, perhaps

    Related is the lack of availability of EV options at the lower price points.

    Moat manufacturers have ICE cars at a variety of pricing levels, but so far EVs are not available that compete with the economy models of ICE cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Cost is a factor, but consider that if you live in the urban core, at least in some cities, it’s possible to simply not have a car. Vancouver from my recollection has pretty good transit and is fairly walkable in comparison to eg Houston.

    Which comes back to cost doesn’t it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Am I missing something? The only time the article mentions cost is in trying to explain why fewer women drive EVs. They say the reason its popular is that suburbs can home-charge whereas urban areas don't have charging infrastructure for most residents.

    Not that I think you're wrong, but its not what the article says.

  • source
  • parent