so what happens when i start barfing up gold coins and never can't afford food again, what then?

So what happens when AI can recode on demand... Rather than programming a game, a gaming AI just generates the game as you play it.

Rather than writing a program, it just codes and runs the code at the same time... so that what you need is there when you request it to be.

Code chunks being put together and pulled apart as required. What then?

I consider aetheism to be more an absence of belief in gods.
Its not that i believe there arent gods. Its that i have no belief in gods.
The former being anti-god/anti-religion. And the later being anti-belief.
Maybe like "not accidentally cutting yourself" and "not having a knife". Both lead to "not accidentally cutting yourself", but 1 involves a knife.

I pulled it from Github. Full disclosure, the experiment isn't going well, but I'm determined to see how far I can take it.

Chromium is open source. Google is evil.

"Fork it, grandpa!"

That's how I felt when I found MDMA, and it allowed me to find joy in parties and being around people. If used responsibly, of course.

I'm getting exactly the same feeling with AI now. It is instant dopamine fun, but I can see it being addicting in exactly the same way. Of course I tell myself I'll use it responsibly, for work, and keep my skills sharp by making sure to do some of my own projects, and be responsible in properly reviewing and checking my code.

Just as I told myself that I'll keep a healthy pause of two months between mdma use, and have a rogorous vitamine and supplements plans based on the most recommended harm reduction research.

Sure, I did manage to do that for the first half a year or so, you can guess how it is now.

It's pretty unsettling how exactly the same it feels, the way you slowly start giving up on things you've sworn to do, and how you slowly start to be unable to do/enjoy the thing (be it parties or coding) without it.

well that's a big F you for people enjoying freedom at work by using linux instead of windows and avoiding corpo bs

How ironic!

Now post the output:

ls -ld /run/systemd/io.*

Sure. I don't know what the answer is, but I really don't think everyone lining up like lemmings to walk off the same cliff is the answer.

It's sad to see Linus freely advertise for fascist corporations.

It's sad to see Linus inspire thousands of aspiring coders to now learn the wrong lessons, because that's absolutely what will happen. Anyone trying to learn to code right now is proper fucked.

Linus' knowledge and other maintainers knowledge will likely die with him now because shortcuts are inevitable and people will understand less and less the more they offload.

We keep seeing this repeated, literally hundreds of times in just the past year alone. Code bases are shit, people who maintained them either fucked, or worse started vibe coding, and the LLM yes man machine isn't gonna not blow smoke up Torvalds ass just because he is Linus.

I understand your points, and I agree with most of it.

It's just, this feels like someone has a heroin addiction, and our solution is to get them hooked on alcohol.

You made the claim it is.

Its based on every company I know pulling back on token spend because it keeps getting more expensive.

Based on the fact the the growth they anticipate is everyone will use it everywhere. And thats not going to be true any time soon.

Based on the fact queries cost more and more tokens on the new models.

Yes, and we'll all be left behind if we don't join the sect, and LLMs are here to stay and replace the world as we know it.

It's one of the few things they ever got right.

E: I should also say that the release of Defender was devastating to my "house doctor" PC services side-hustle. E2 XP SP1 out also rocked my profits - that RPC vuln was a gold mine

You might not be an intentional political statement, but your code is colored by politics. You don't give a shit about the perception of people, that is infused in politics. My point is, your stance within society transpires through your actions, and this has an effect on society.

And typically, the stance of refusing to acknowledge the political part of things, whether it is in software or not, is loved by the far-right. In this current sociopolitical context, doing that is picking a side. And also showing that you're privileged enough to afford to "ignore" politics, which is not the case for everyone.

--

Atheism is about believing in the absence of god, what you're describing is indeed agnosticism. God is a belief, which doesn't require any proof or evidence since it's just a belief. You can then disagree with the consequences or implications of such beliefs, but evidence is not really in question since there can be none. The day there is evidence of god, it won't be a belief anymore, but science.

However, hit on religions as much as you want, because those are not beliefs, they're more akin to sects, with a whole set of (bullshit) rules on how reality works that are based on nothing.

As such, religions and software are both real world and are both linked to politics. They are having an effect on how society is structured, and how people live their lives. Also, note that many beliefs are very much political, it's not what I was saying. My point was that believing in god doesn't have as much of an impact as supporting "AI", as believing in god is a personal belief, while LLMs are having a pretty bad impact on the world already.

helloWorld()

Based on what rationale?

Are you familiar with the concept of shared libraries? Please, stop embarrasing yourself.

And it'll probably feel 150% faster compared to Windows. Just like Edge. lol

Ypu claimed up above a 900x increase in token efficiency, and claim that demand is outpacing efficiencies.

So yes you are.

I'm calling bullshit on demand outpacing efficiencies in general.

Complicate requirement are kind of out of date. They keep adding requirements to them but then don't often take them away. So if a requiment made sense 20 years ago it's still there even though there are better strategies to protect your environment.

You could skip a requiment if you can establish a compensatinh control and show that the threat the requirements is intended to address is addressed. For example skipping antivirus by reimagining the devices every morning, this is an absurd example but would work.

People will scoff at this but speaking from experience Defender is a very good AV if you are using MS Windows. MS has a vested interest in keeping their flagship OS safe.

Putting it on Linux though? No . Fucking. Way .

No IT Auditor ever tests this, the just ask and if you say yes they move on. To actually test this you would have to statically sample a random sample of devices and confirm the antivirus is installed.

Instead that auditors are going to ask for a list off devices enrolled in the antivirus and a list of all devices (if the company even has an asset inventory) and see if they look right. But, most like the asset list will come from the antivirus enrollment and it won't matter.

It's your stance that's wrong. I usually refrain from putting random bullshit on the Internet when smashed, but that's just me.

NetBSD has one slop commit, and they have apparently since removed the code it brought in. Besides, I need some level of mainstream software support for uni, and pkgsrc is half-decent for that.

GNU Mach (a component of Hurd), meanwhile, have been using Claude for code reviews (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2026-03/msg00100.html, https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2026-02/pdffAOvuZusjj.pdf); and the GNU Project itself is still on the fence (GCC, for example, has 57 slop commits and counting).