I love that points don't matter. It means that I can say controversial shit like: Janeway did nothing wrong. That's right I went there she didn't murder tuvix.

Complicate requirement are kind of out of date. They keep adding requirements to them but then don't often take them away. So if a requiment made sense 20 years ago it's still there even though there are better strategies to protect your environment.

You could skip a requiment if you can establish a compensatinh control and show that the threat the requirements is intended to address is addressed. For example skipping antivirus by reimagining the devices every morning, this is an absurd example but would work.

No IT Auditor ever tests this, the just ask and if you say yes they move on. To actually test this you would have to statically sample a random sample of devices and confirm the antivirus is installed.

Instead that auditors are going to ask for a list off devices enrolled in the antivirus and a list of all devices (if the company even has an asset inventory) and see if they look right. But, most like the asset list will come from the antivirus enrollment and it won't matter.

More than likely what was signed was not a legal document just something to be used for a reference when forging the signatures. And, if they are willing to forge all the legal paperwork they are probably willing to forge the notary too.

Watched it a few weeks ago for the first time in years. The movies hits differently now that we have has so many comic book movies.

I was referring to the people that build the MLMs not the MLM themselves.

I don't have experience with cancer but my email has seen an increase in people claiming to have used an LLM to design a perpetual motion machine

They are not. They are purpose built systems that leverage specialized knowledge.

The problem is you have people asking LLMs to find a cure for cancer and have no way of knowing if the output is any good. Then those people start emailing everyone saying they cured cancer.

Lol

That optimisation may come at a greater cost than using an existing engine. You also have to consider, with an industry standard engine it is easier to hire and train new devs.

This is a good first attempt, but it's a little open ended, can you think of a question that is a little directed?

My strategy is usually to ask them questions that challenge their assumptions. Studies have shown this to be the best way to get someone to change there mind. However, most of the time they stop replying before I can gage if they have changed their mind or not. I assume that my questions make them uncomfortable so they stop engaging instead of evaluating their opinions.