[–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

Nothing against Hyperland, but be advised that iirc, there are currently working on things that break config files (what omarchy sums up to be)

If you want something quick-ish, KDE could work as a replacement, granted you use the keyboard shortcuts.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    3m in AI world is literally nothing. You could spend that in a few days training a model. 3m is basically a token amount for marketing purposes. This is not a serious deal in any way.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago

    He didn't invent a programming language. He designed a framework for a programming language. I assure you the second one is a lot easier. It's like a library of functions and class suites that make programming quicker and easier as the boilerplate code you'd have to write is done already.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    yeah, don't. I tried it again last week after I saw they have their own "kernel" now. It's an absolute mess of a "distro".

    The launcher is a cluster fuck of vibe coded slop prompted by someone who was coked out of their mind. it doesn't work and is incredibly poorly designed.

    Normally if you want to configure Hyprland you do so via one LUA config file. Claude Code decided that cutting said config up into 6 LUAs that are ALL commented out would be a better approach. It uses neovim as it's default editor. note the VIM part. so logically to navigate a TILING WINDOW MANAGER whose default editor is neoVIM you'd use VIM style navigation right? nope not on omarchy. it's arrow keys. want to actually have vim nav for your vim based WM? ok find the correct hyprland lua config and then UNBIND all the existing configs to then REBIND them to what you want. Normally you'd just literally swap out the keybinds in one lua config. nope on omarchy you gotta make sure you're in the right lua config file and then try to find out which keys are bound, unbind them, then rebind them to what you want. This is just the primary example of how this "distro" operates.

    for something that claims it will speed up dev time for users it sure as fuck prides itself on slowing you down as much as possible and forcing the user to pay for an LLM subscription. THIS is why companies are dumping money into the thing. unlike say Windows where you can easily use the OS without an AI agent Omarchy is designed to force you to use one if you want to get anything done. you have no choice. the configurations are so ass backwards that only an AI can configure them in a timely manner.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I really wish I was spineless enough to just start throwing around half arsed projects and beg for millions of funding whenever a craze comes around… fuck I’d be a millionaire by now. easy peasy.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I know one person - the one who recommended it to me.

    The premise was interesting. The execution? As you’ve said, slop.

    You could get the same done by installing Arch, Claude Code or Codex, and a $20 subscription, plus about a day’s worth of tinkering- which you’d still do on Omarchy to get it working as you want it to…

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    How has this distro done so well? It's just some dude's personal preferences for arch packaged up with some pretty ASCII art.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    No, but such companies see it as a pocket change and if it does get popular, they'll benefit immensely from all these people buying AI tokens.

    They could go and put all this money into any other distro (like Linux Mint, which is incredibly popular and takes a lot of work to make, yet runs on ~$10k a month), they just don't see what's in it for themselves.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›