As every chess goalie knows you've gotta horsey around their castle two times before the end of the half.
post
I hope it was farce, but it's still pretty accurate. The secret is cheating and then declaring victory after the opponent refuses to play.
Maybe they misheard... When your opponent makes a move, you should be thinking 10 moves ahead...
No no, this makes sense, you literally need to cheat.
So what that brick do?
The FIDE regulations dictate that a player who declines en passant must drop a brick on their pipi. A brick is kept nearby for such eventualities
I figured it was something like that.
I mean I am not a chess enthusiast but I knew chest since I was a kid and learning of en passant just now, wow.
We hit that bullseye and the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards.
Checkmate.
But that is how CEO assholes work (or try to until they can't get away with it)
Source: worked with nearly a dozen CEOs of various size companies
Alpha in the software sense: pre-release, lots of bugs, definitely not ready for production, sale, or wide public viewing.
I hear you can cheat at chess by sticking a vibrator in your ass.
Maybe that's what the rich CEOs are doing to win
But he's correct. If you're rich enough you can bribe all the seconds, then you can make extra moves and irregular moves. Heck, you can just have all the seconds declare you victor.
For extra points, hire guys with guns to make sure everyone at the tournament agrees with your rules.
This is the state of modern neoliberal capitalism from the view of billionaire oligarchs and multi-national conglomerate corporations.
Well instead of "make" it should be "think" and it would be fine, you fool
It's called tempo, you sub-1800ers /s
Aww man, I just got up to 1350 😢
wait ELOs aren't like golf?
fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
uuuuuuuuuuuck
I "know" how to play chess but when I try to play against a computer I constantly get reminded I can't move my piece there because I would be putting myself in check.
Pretty sure I've only won 2 chess games in my life. ..... Against someone at my level.
you didn't know about the French cum sock opener? you fool ! had you known you could have forked me into giving up one of my pieces !
Chess isn't actually a logic game or a smarts game, it's a memory game. If you're a computer or one of those 15-people-per-generation chess brains, then yeah, you probably can logic your way into thinking enough moves ahead. If not, your only option is to remember a bunch of different plays and learn how to recognise and execute the preditermined strategies. If you try to do it your way, you will be stuck losing to a bad computer or chess club kids online
I gave up on playing chess. The game has become such a metaphor, such a fetish symbol for intellect, so every dude "knows how to play", but won't risk the humiliation of loss, and therefore won't play. I don't enjoy online chess, so I just don't get to play.
If you told me this before, I would be winning every game of chess I played
I don't want to ruin this meme, but he's saying a real thing in a confusing way. You have to think 10 moves ahead of your opponent and also the repercussions of each move at every step.
Zero points for saying it wrong, though.
“You miss every shot you take”
“The only thing we do not fear is fear itself”
“Interrupt your opponent when he is making a mistake”
There is a wonderful cartoon book by Tom Weller called "Minims". A minim is the opposite of a maxim. So the book is full of illustrations of wisdom like "The early worm gets eaten by the bird." and "You'll catch more flies with honey than you'd care to." The book's subtitle is "Man is the only animal that wears bow ties."
(Although, I have to admit, my husky sometimes wears bow ties and he looks a lot better in them than I do.)
is this from Trump's book?
Business is like Start Craft 2, you gotta raise your APM if you want to beat the Korean pros
There's uh...a horsie! And maybe a queen. That's all my knowledge!
What is the analog, to the en passant, move in the business world?
He could have just said "think(s)" in place of "make(s)" and it would have kind of made sense.




all 3 comments