top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 84 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (34 children)

I learned there were asbestos tobacco pipes like a week ago. Humanity really didn't see any of this coming.

Asbestos tobacco pipes are insanely rare and collectible these days, though. No one dares smoke them, more historical discussion pieces.

  • source
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [+] 50 points 4 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 67 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Asbestos really seemed like a miracle material. Its so easy to pull out of the ground and process into anything from tiles to fabric to brake disks. It's abundant, cheap, and easy to mine. In a world where it seemed everything was always catching on fire, asbestos was magically fireproof. It was saving houses and children and housewives from going up in flames if they got too near a stove or fireplace. It was revolutionising industry, making workplaces safer and more efficient. I really don't blame anyone for using it everywhere in those early years.

    But greed took over after asbestos products flooded the market and the major health hazards became apparent. The corpos and the govts were too greedy and scared to admit it was dangerous, because that would mean choosing to dismantle a billions-dollar value strong industry and start recalling everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 4 months ago

    Exactly this. I knew this old retired fighter pilot guy, and he had asbestos gloves he held onto from his service days. He let me play with them at a BBQ once. You could straight up shove your hand into a pile of burning coals, hold it in your hand. Cool to the touch. It really seemed like magic. It really is a wonder-material. If not for the afromentioned cancer....

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Like with aspartame. There was no legit long term studies done until recently and it showed that aspartame can reduce intelligence

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Wow. Thanks for mentioning this. I had no idea.

    I found this study published in the journal of the American Academy of Neurology just last year. The results are kind of horrifying. And it's not only aspartame -- they made similar connections with other low-calorie sweeteners.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    There seem to be problems with their study

    Here's the first glaring one:

    the mean consumption of LNCSs was 92.1 ± 90.1 mg/d.

    What an absolutely ridiculous range of consumption for a study population.

    Also the years they were collecting this data unfortunately had a whole pandemic occur. Covid is very well documented at causing long term mental decline. I'd like to see how many of their study group had confirmed covid infectious.

    Overall I'm not saying it's not worth further investigation, but there are far too many unknown variables that the study did not control for. Rate and frequency of consumption are huge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Wait is this ± 1 standard deviation? So basically, it's either 0 or 180 in a binary choice?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    Basically, the fact that they allowed people consuming 2 mg and 182.2 mg into the same study group is insane.

    Also considering 1 can (12 fl oz) diet coke contains about 184 mg of aspartame, they didn't even bother to study an interesting group. I'm sure you could find 100 people that consume at least 2 cans worth a day.

    Honestly I'm curious how someone consumes only 2mg of aspartame a day. That's about 1 ml of diet coke

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Isn't it asbestos dust that's the issue? Like asbestos in the walls isn't harming anyone, but if it gets demolished or destroyed then the dust is what causes issues?

    At least that's what I heard, but it could be wrong. And I guess scraping the pipe might create some dust anyway...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    They all seem sealed with a black varnish, and I have personally never held one or been able to look at the bowl or stem to see if they're coated as well.

    Naturally, both the stem and the bowl would lightly cake with carbon over time, 5-6 bowls before it's on everything evenly.

    Find one and be the hypothesis lol.

    I'll stick to briar

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    The dust is actually fine needles that cause chronic inflammation in lungs, which triggers cancer. But this can happen with any fibres. Lately everyone is using carbon fiber and it's as bad as asbestos.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    Oh shit, that would make smoking really bad for your lungs. You could even get lung cancer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (6 children)

    Fun Fact!

    Pipe Tobacco is almost never inhaled by pipe smokers if they never smoked cigarettes beforehand, and pipe enthusiasts are more anal about natural tobacco and unnatural additives.

    This is one of the difficult parts of reading up on lung cancers between both groups. I couldn't find any studies pointing directly at "pipe and only pipe smoking", as the population pools for testing people dwindled rather quickly by the late 1980's since pipe smoking was mostly gone outside of hobbyists.

    I'd pair this up with vaping/snus in the harm-reduction camp if that's true. I wouldn't consider any type of smoke entering your body as entirely harm-free... or vapor, or nicotine for that matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    AFAIK they are more likely to get somethijg like mouth cancer instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    That is the most likely risk, but that tends to be more associated with chewing tobacco and dip if you're going by how saturated the individual is by the medium vs severity of the risk.

    Vaping... is the really iffy one. Who made the juice? What's in it? What's the coil made of? Does it dissolve into the vapor? How much? Does too much heat effect it chemically? Yada yada.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    No in favor of smoking or vaping but...

    Who made the juice? What's in it? What's the coil made of? Does it dissolve into the vapor? How much? Does too much heat effect it chemically? Yada yada.

    That can all be applied in some part to tobacco as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    All crucial things to know. I'm lucky in that I know how to research supply chains and can afford juices made in Greece and France.

    The heating part (that whole study was bullshit) you WILL know if it's not right as soon as you inhale burning coil.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (7 children)

    They’ve used pipes with lead in them for water ducts in Ancient Rome IIRC

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (5 children)

    Who do you mean by „we”? Italians?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Unfortunately a LOT of water distribution in the US is done in lead pips, That's the whole damn flint water crisis. They don't replace them because left undisturbed they're not shedding at a dangerous rate, but once you fuck around with flow and pressure, it gets bad real quick.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

    Asbestos shoveling competition
    Wittenoom Miners playing an asbestos shovelling competition

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 45 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    the tingling let's you know it's working.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Did you know? Clean, fresh air has a natural tingling effect. Most places these days are so polluted with toxins that we never experience perfectly clean air anymore.

    That's where asbestos comes in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago

    At least he has his safety squints on.

  • source
  • [+] 27 points 4 months ago (14 children)
  • [+] 0 points 4 months ago (13 children)
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    Red cheetos weren't killing people, that's why they looked into that. Cancer-can here, with a proven history of being deadly, would look a-ok to them if they were still made. They'd probably issue a fake commercial made under the name of whatever agency should definitely not approve of this where whey literally spray this on burning meat on a bbq then gobble it with a glass of old refried grease.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 4 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (8 children)

    All I can find is a 1983 study on rats that show some negative effect on reproduction and physical activity with significant amount of it in their diet, while non-dose dependant effect where also measured. The sample was less than fifty rats for each group, and the results where all over the place (2.5% of the diet caused similar to more damage than 10% of the diet).

    You'd have to eat ton of the stuff, almost exclusively, to even reach levels that are considered still safe for humans. Beyond that, it's not more dangerous than chili.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 4 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (5 children)

    Yes, that was… my point? You'd need to ingest so much food for this to reach a level that's still considered safe that you'd probably have a lot of other issues before reaching that point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 4 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    Be sure of whatever you want. Don't let yourself be stopped by facts and actual studies. After all, what's reality in the face of a strong, uninformed gut feeling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    The plus side of it being liquid is it probably wouldn't be very friable and not wind up in your lungs, until it dries out that is.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I've had deep fried kool-aid at the state fair before, so I bet this is pretty friable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago
    [–] 21 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Good god. Lemme guess, the propellant in that can are CFCs and they added lead to lubricate the spray since it kept clogging the nozzle. May as well add arsenic for flavor.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    It's always interesting how amazing things always turn out to be deadly. Like Ephedrine was a miracle weight loss drug, asbestos is a fantastic insulator, ect. I'm waiting for the GLP1 crap everyone is taking to have insane effects in a few years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (15 children)

    I hate how every time we come up with a new "miracle" chemical that solves really big issues it ends up being either carcinogenic or devastatingly harmful to the environment.

    It's like how we almost made bed bugs extinct in America but the chemical being used was causing cancer and birth defects.

    Why can't we have nice chemical things!?!?

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    We discovered plastics, which pretty much is a miracle chemicle, they're mostly not even that harmful unless you make a gigaton of it and just kind of dump it absolutely everywhere

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Glares in microplastics in my balls

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    First there was just cheese. Then we refined that cheese into plastics. Because cheese is just a mere handful of polymers away from plastic. And you wonder why you get constipated when you eat too much cheese....

    Then we got better and developed celluloid to make exploding billiard balls and false teeth from. It also got used to make pocket knife handles because you could make the most beautiful tortoise shell handles and Mother of Pearl, (the tortoises and oysters were very happy about that). And colored handles were bright and vibrant and stayed that way. But the off gassing would often rust the blades to dust in short order.

    Today, we have a thousand different plastic formulations for a thousand different uses. And it's everywhere from soda bottles and cell phones, to cars, airplanes, artificial hips, and rocket ships. And even your balls.

    It's a brave new plastic world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    H2O is a pretty nice chemical, that makes people drinking it less thristy, and is good for plants and animals as well. Just be careful that you don't have too much of it, and you are good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    ⚠️Stay away from dihydrogen monoxide (DHMO).⚠️ This dangerous chemical shows an 100% fatality rate for those who have consumed it, and can cause instant death when inhaled.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    True story: drinking actually pure water can kill you.

    For the ignorant down vote:

    • Direct effects on the intestinal mucous membrane, metabolism and mineral homeostasis or other body functions. • Little or no intake of calcium and magnesium from low-mineral water. • Low intake of other essential elements and microelements. • Loss of calcium, magnesium and other essential elements in prepared food. • Possible increased dietary intake of toxic metals.

    https://aguaenmexico.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/WHO-HEALTH-RISKS-FROM-DRINKING-DEMINERALISED-WATER.pdf

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago*

    that would require us to be in control of our own lives, instead of rich owning us. thorough research costs a lot of money and resources. it would cut into profits and some rich guy might not be able to buy third yact.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    Why can’t we have nice chemical things!?!?

    Because we live by the p-value today. We'd rather get eaten alive by bed bugs every night for the next 60 years instead of having up to a 20% increased chance of developing cancer when we turn 73.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    We can. Plenty of good stuff. Or at least, not terrible stuff. But it makes more profit to get something out quick and see how it goes than do long, serious, costly research before releasing a product.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Well that and there's always the manufacturing issue wherein you could make something that does everything you want but it's a bitch to manufacture, maintain, or install. A good example is lead pipes were a known issue but the hope was that calcium buildup would help solve the problem before it became a problem, galvanized steel technically existed at the time but manufacturing it in the quantities needed was a bitch and Iron pipes would just burst constantly so that was dead in the water.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago

    Carrying this instead of pepper spray /j

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago

    Spray on insulation that is fire and mould resistant. Sounds good

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Sometimes I wonder what kinds of things we're using today that we still haven't found are toxic, carcinogenic or harmful in other ways...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I think we're 20 years away from a lot of vaping law suits. Lots of people think they're healthy despite the evidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    It's pretty well known they're unhealthy, although sometimes this gets ignored. As a non-smoker it bugs me that these sometimes get a pass to be used indoors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago*

    It’s pretty well known they’re unhealthy

    Not if you live in the UK. NHS MDs don't make as much as other countries, and the are trivially easy to buy off. So, they use the language "safer than smoking" to cover their cuntish asses even though they know the truth. All the time taking consultancy fees.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

    I can just feel the If you or a loved one were diagnosed with mesothelioma, you may be entitled to financial compensation ads pouring in with this.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›