Calling out CBS as crooked after installing an ardent supporter as head of the company is an interesting play.
post
As a parent, it’s tough to restrain a child. I understand her frustration.
I'm surprised he didn't accuse her of raping children.
It's nothing but projection from this waste of oxygen.
It's frustrating how the right hasn't figured out Trump's formula. Unless, they really don't want to.
Losing? It's rigged. They're cheating.
Republican who speaks out? RINO, low IQ, traitor.
Left? Stupid, terrorist, socialist, Insert Insult before first name.
Media that questions or doesn't agree? Fake news, corrupt, low viewership, stupid person and insert insult to women.
Celebrity who doesn't agree? Washed up, no talent, traitor, has been.
It's the same thing every single time. Not once has it changed since 2016. Whenever there is a tough question or a disagreement, he can't handle it. He hasn't ever answered a question with a thought out response that either diffuses the situation, or actually counters the argument being made. His brain doesn't work that way. It's instantly programmed to insult and disparage.
That trait usually reveals one of two things. The person is a flat out liar in what they are saying. They cannot formulate anything to get themselves out of it.
Secondly, the person is just stupid. Too stupid to figure out a way to put proper words together to debate the argument at hand. Five year olds do this because they haven't matured enough. It's understandable. For a 79 year old person, you could say it's age. Trump, however, has been doing that for at least the last twenty-five years.
I have to chalk it up as a zombie mentality for the right. They simply hear and ask no questions. As I said, frustrating.
I have been convinced for a while that we could very easily get the orange dipshit to do a 180 on everything he claims he believes if someone were to suggest things in a way that made him think they were his ideas and just appease his ego.
But that would require appeasing the son of a bitch, and fuck that.
I don't think they hear it at all. Anything unflattering or challenging is caught by the thought firewall at Fox/OAN/WTF and dropped. The bubble is comfortable and viewers rarely bother to step outside of it.
Congrats on doing your job like 6 years too late.
TACO
He can't even withstand softball questions in his old, soft age.
Sad thing is that he's such a moron and a narcissist that he probably actually believes this.
It's DARVO
Deny
Attack
Reverse
Victim and
Offender
I honestly just don't believe he's that intelligent
It doesn't take much intelligence to act on. It's literally just "Nuh uh, you are" - the default retort of children everywhere.
I guess he's been living that his whole life. Would make sense that it's the thing he'd fall back on as his brain is starting to rot.
I really don't think most practitioners are. They are just crafty enough to know how to try to freeze their targets with this kind of tactic.
Aww... what a delicate little snowflake
Why would people who were successfully charged for breaking laws and actively participated in an insurrection deserve compensation or reparations as his reps have called it? He knows there's no excuse and he couldn't recall the talking point he was told so he loses patience and goes with typical attack he always uses.
You're either crooked or you're stupid
I think he just described the venn diagram of his base
Is there any audio or video for that?
happy cake day
Why do we always assume that the cake is happy?
First: Acid burn?
Second: You wouldn't have happened to have found a pre-cut version (to the parts described in the article), or a full transcript, would you?
Edit: YouTube already has hundreds, so nevermind 😉
Gas prices will come down as soon as the non-existent war that we already won is over!
"A weaponization fund to help compensate people who believe they were unfairly targeted by the federal government" eh? So every black man, woman and immigrant in America?
To be fair she did a terrible job, I'm not a trump supporter but her questions did feel antagonistic, which is fair, but it's not surprising that Plump left and I would have done the same. Also I find it really upsetting that the obvious question regarding Iran is 'why didn't you negotiate a deal with Iran instead of using violence?' getting him to address that put him in an awkward position where he needs to admit that he can't negotiate without threatening war, which goes against his 'no new wars campaign' which would also open him up to questions of 'the war has cost $X so far, that is a lot of money, why wasn't it possible to use that money in a non violent way to negotiate peace and better relations?'
Wut. Antagonistic is the only way we should speak to war criminals who make extravagant claims without providing evidence.
What's the point? He'll say that her news media is against him unfairly and it'll be good proof that he's right even though he's not, also if he decides not to talk to her again then it'll make it easier to only talk to boot lickers
top 48 comments