It takes a really massive fucking loser to illegally rename a building after themselves.
post
charge an admittance fee to have citizens remove it. people would pay a bunch to be able to destroy anything with his name on it
The risk is that they will piss on it, which damages the stones.
You need to screen to the first few people or tell them explicitly not to do that and to rip it from the walls (they don't have to be gentle).
Then get the next people to piss on it once it's on the ground or trash.
Get out of my head.
I also have a bottle system worked out for the bastard's grave so I can avoid indecent expose charges.
gotta wash it with acids anyways after his name was touching the stone
Sorry to be that guy, but urine is basic
So thats what the kids these days are talking about when they call something "basic." It means urine.
What if you eat a bunch of acid first?
Apparently it can be either, varying in pH between 4.5 and 8.
So largely acidic then
The fact that the range goes deeper into the acidic side doesn't necessarily mean it spends more time in that part of the range. I have no idea which condition is more common.
For anyone else wondering what the ruling was based on (other than trump being a narcissistic loser):
In a 94-page opinion, the judge said the Kennedy Center's board of trustees, made up of primarily Trump loyalists, violated the 1964 federal law that created the center, arguing the statute makes clear "the Kennedy Center must be named for, and is meant to honor, President Kennedy alone."
honest question:
how tf do you write a 94 page opinon on a building?
Lots of citations. Lots.
Also, wide margins.
You should try to read one! Skim it, I mean.
I haven't read this opinion specifically (and some of this probably won't apply), but generally:
They explain all of the relevant procedural stuff in detail, and even justifying how things are being handled, with citations. Then the basics about what happened, the arguments on each side. Discuss the relevant laws and relevant edge cases. They will talk about new submissions to the court, and basically tell the story of what happened legally (there was a hearing on x date, defense submitted new evidence on y date etc). Then they sort through all the bullshit as judges, saying what's accurate/a good argument and what's not. Then write their actual opinion. 100 pages is pretty standard from the ones I've seen.
When you charge by the hour, you find a way.
I like your confidence that they're actually "basing" decisions on anything but capitulation, but I appreciate the information
It's crazy that that needed including, but belated kudos to the lawyer who wrote that
The Trump administration is, at best, a denial of service attack on every facet of the US. The amount of time and effort spent putting his name on there, and then slowly determining that it's not allowed to be there, and now removing it could likely have fed hundreds of people for months. He's doing the same thing all over the place, trying to put his name on airports, money, statues, etc. Death by 1000 cuts. And this is probably the least bad thing this administration is doing to the US.
It's the flood the zone with shit strategy from the likes of the Bannon the fascist.
How much money did it cost the taxpayers to rebrand it with Trumps name and now to rebrand it, once again, with the original name?
Think about that waste
And then extrapolate all the other things the regime is doing that are illegal and unconstitutional and tying up the courts unnecessarily while normal people sit in jails waiting for their day in court. Waste of money. Waste of time (for people who are removed from normal life). It's a travesty.
I wonder why he's unpopular? Seems like a man of the people to me! /s
While I want good things for all people and generally do not wish harm on others, I do enjoy his base gradually turning against him and the public embarrassment of low Trump-phone sales and artists pulling out of the 250 anniversary show. And I admit that I kinda like that his boosters are getting hurt. I feel bad about it (I'd rather we all proper), but fuck you. You voted for it.
If he did it illegally, can he be sued somehow? Or, no matter what, it's all taxpayers money? An arch, a ballroom, his name everywhere, his face everywhere, gilt everywhere...holy shit...I only ever saw this happening on a badly written 87 minute comedy movie.
I hope they can scrape it off while he's still alive. I want to see him queen out over it.
the Inept moron probably did this just to waste tax payers money and more
It's not "wasted" if the money for parts and labor were being funneled into his accounts. Then, it's just more embezzlement
He either gets his name on an iconic building or he gets to play the victim with his base. No downside for him.
Oh he's going to fucking hate that.
New law, any acting president is not allowed to put his/her name on anything. If you want to be remembered, do the things that people will want to remember you for. Leave the decision on naming to future administrations.
"The Donald J Trump and The John F Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts"
- The Michael Scott Memorial Center for the Performing Arts
I think the Kennedy name should be removed completely. Then it could be The Anticipatory Trump Memorial Center. And then once it happens, go right back to the Kennedy Memorial.




all 63 comments