top 57 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 36 points 5 months ago (16 children)

Vials were put next to each other in the centrifuge.

Unwatchable.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    OH MY GOD NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT THIS AND I'M NOT EVEN A BIOLOGIST!!!

    Edit: OR A CHEMIST

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Then you don't know that there's such a thing as a self balancing centrifuge.

    People who get hung up on this particular detail need to get over it. 🫩

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    It may be less about what the centrifuge can do and more about the culture surrounding centrifuges. It's my impression that people who are in a position to be using a centrifuge balance them out of habit. Even if they don't need to.

    Not balancing them (in the event that it is a self balancing one) may be similar to computer science debates about tabs vs spaces. A difference that's more cultural than important.

    I could be wrong, biology isn't my field. This is just my impression from having watched this debate play out several times.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    That one was not a self-balancing centrifuge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I think this is a detail done on purpose. Presumably they actually just filmed a centrifuge, instead of faking it somehow. That means it must have been balanced, which means they balanced it another way just to film the "mistake." I think it's to get people to talk about this, which is incredibly minor, so people talk about how accurate it is by only having one stupid thing to complain about. Negatives spread a lot easier than positives on the internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Presumably they actually just filmed a centrifuge, instead of faking it somehow.

    Why buy a real one? It doesn't need to work. They spent $20 attaching a disk with holes to a motor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Maybe. It was a lot more than that though. It had the shell and everything else. I suspect it'd be cheaper and easier to just buy or borrow a real one, even if it's not usable as lab equipment anymore. It's not like they're super uncommon.

    Also, that still needs to be balanced to some degree if it's spinning reasonably quickly. It doesn't just suddenly not impart a lot of force because it's a "fake" centrifuge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I loved the book and have been looking forward to this movie ever since it was announced, and it didn't disappoint. Project Hail Mary is probably going to end up being the best movie I'll see this year unless Spielberg's upcoming 'Disclosure Day' somehow manages to recapture the magic of 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind' (1977). Which, I don't think is likely.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Its been a while since I saw a movie this good. Thre was soo much detail and thought into this movie and I Loved every bit of it.

    Amaze Amaze Amaze.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    I genuenly like when Sci-fi understands that language is not universal and that communication requires effort. Most other IP just hand waves it with a translator or tech because most audiences wont handle subtitles, PHM, Stargate movie film, and Darmok (Star Trek: NG - S5E2) get it, and I appreciate that.

    Also they get the sound in space thing right. Loved the movie, the book has been added to my increasingly long audiobook queue...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago

    Books and movies simply aren't the same. Both the book and the movie were great for different reasons.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago*

    Excellent book and excellent movie. Very faithful adaptation from book to film. I believe the author was involved in the production of the movie as well, but I can't find any explicit sources for that.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    If you can’t stand Ryan Gosling then you probably shouldn’t watch the movie as he has like 90% of the screen time.

    Also there’s a choice to balance between how much science you want to explain and character development and other plot points that must be made. But this is a personal opinion and I think they did a great job and I’m just glad they didn’t make it a trilogy or something.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    Having read the book, I absolutely loved the movie.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    I listened to the entire 20 audiobook and I'm scared to watch the movie. I loved the book so much i dont want the visuals and interpretations in my head to be ruined.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    I watched the movie, fell in love, then read the book. Yes the book is better but they did an amazing job with the movie. You won't be disappointed. They took some minor liberties but nothing crazy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    I've been in that boat. If you're artistically inclined, maybe you could sketch out how you imagine some characters or scenes from the book. Then you can look back on them after the movie, to jog your memory. I went looking for fan art before the movie came out, and that helped me cement it as a story that has no official visual interpretation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    As someone who is still in the same boat, a couple things I've heard:

    Spoilered for those who haven't read/seen it

    • the science is still there, but it's not the key focus (figures, most general audiences would get bored, it's still present but I expected them to dramatize it anyway)
    • rocky is a little more "R2D2 meets puppy" he's useful but he's also meant to be a sort of emotional foil. (Think less, "we are two different people in the same situation" and more "oh wow I thought I was alone, what's this thing, what's that thing, wow wow wow")
    • the core of the movie is still intact (hail Mary, we know the end when the rocket launched, let's save the world(s))
  • Overall, same treatment as The Martian, not as in depth as the book, but still worth the watch in its own way regardless

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    I liked the human starship in the film more than the one described in the book. Mostly because the movie ship had real switches and buttons (touchscreens are a terrible idea in space!). It looked more like the ISS.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Didn't read the book, but loved the movie

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (9 children)

    NOTE: I've tried to keep this as spoiler-free as possible, but even so you may not want to read this until after you've seen the movie.

    The movie was definitely good, but fell pretty short compared to the book, and especially when compared to The Martian's adaptation.

    For one, the movie felt way too much like a comedy, almost like a Taika Waititi Marvel adaptation of the much more serious (but still very funny) book, which felt tonally weird and didn't really land for me. Even the weight of the reveal of

    spoilerGrace's refusal to go

    was completely undercut by a tonally inappropriate, almost zany

    spoilerchase sequence

    that robbed the scene of most of the pathos it should have had. Reminds me of this excellent video about how modern blockbusters seem allergic to sincerity to their detriment.

    We also didn't like how much more useless the movie made Grace feel. The book went out of its way early to show that he was a resourceful, intelligent, excellent problem solver, and while there was certainly a bit of this in the movie, it still felt like Grace was pretty much useless, undeserving dead weight, and like he either completely lucked his way through or had to rely only on

    spoilerRocky,

    while in the book their partnership felt much more collaborative. All of this combined to make the reveal I mentioned earlier feel much darker/more depressing, because you get the impression that no, he really didn't deserve to be there, and then what he says at the end of the movie completely falls flat, because it felt like almost none of it was the result of his choices or character. Feels like it completely undercuts one of the main themes of the book, which is that he did deserve to be there, and that he was the right person for the job, even if he didn't think he was.

    We also thought the movie omitted some of the book's best lines. "You can hear light?" is an all-time great line that still gives me shivers, and it definitely should have been in the movie.


    Things we liked: 1. The movie was visually stunning - everything it was going for in the looks department it completely nailed. 2. One of the most important characters in the movie was very well done, in both design and characterization. Maybe a bit too manic, but that's a relatively small quibble in the larger context of just how well they did with him.

    So yeah, very much an enjoyable two hours, but not as good as it should have been due to a few flawed adaptation decisions.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    They went lighthearted and fun with the adaptation. I'm not sure how much i would have enjoyed the movie if i didn't read the book. But my friend that didn't read it liked it and said it was good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I ended up having the opposite experience as your friend. I never read the book and went in blind thinking it would be akin to Interstellar. I was hugely disappointed. I wanted more science and drama, but instead it felt more like a modern marvel movie with never ending montages.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    Interesting, as someone who didn't read the book,

    spoilerThe chase sequence was one of my favorite parts! A few reasons:

    • It didn't feel zany at all to me. I was focusing only on Ryland and felt his panic, to me his actions looked like an animal trying to run from certain death.
    • The betrayal by everyone he worked with during that time made it a much more intense gut punch for me. Especially Carl.
    • And most important: It felt true to his character. If he faced it stoically, it would have felt like fake Pathos to me. Instead it was a wonderful display of character growth (going from having to be dragged onto the ship to save billions, to risking his life and future to save his buddies' people).
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Yeah, the thing your first spoiler is mentioning really didn't do well for the flow of the movie at all. My gf and I looked at each other during this part and agreed it was a very awkward scene.

    And not because we were bummed that the character would act that way. It's realistic. It was just done very strangely.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

    That's not a spoiler (if you're talking about what I think you are) - it's a horizontal line to break up the wall of text into easier, more digestible chunks.

    Edit: the last spoiler is working on my device, so ¯\(ツ)/¯

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Didn't hate it, but thought the humor and cuteness detracted from it. The ending made me roll my eyes.

    Felt the same about Predator: Badlands. I wanted a hardcore survival/revenge flick and it started out like that, but then you've got an android constantly cracking jokes and a cute little plush toy creature being cute all over the place and it kind of killed it for me. It's not just a Predator movie, it's the first one where the Predator is the main character. There shouldn't be cute and funny.

    Same with a space survival movie with the extinction of multiple species on the line. I'm cool with a little humor cuz people do that to break tension, but it was pretty consistent throughout the entire movie.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    I had pretty similar complaints. I went in completely blind expecting a sort of hard sci-fi realistic film or just more serious I guess. It didn't really feel serious or realistic at all and It felt like a lot of the movie was just trying to make the character cute like you mentioned. And like you say, it tried to be funny and it wasnt at all imo

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Didn't read the book, didn't like the movie.

    Read the martian, didn't like it, didn't like the movie.

    Maybe I just don't like Andy Weir?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    Obviously there is a couple of similarities but they are very different in style and direction. I have only watched the martian once but I have seen this twice already. I loved it. I read neither.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    I thought it was gonna be sort of a hard sci-fi movie going in completely blind and thought it was bad, maybe my fault. Seemed like half the movie was making a character seem cute. Also I wasn't expecting it to try and be funny and it tried and I thought it wasn't funny at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I tried watching it, but it feels very commercial and the lead actor seemed hammy to me. Maybe I shouldn't be surprised. The Martian was decent, though.
    Maybe I'll give it another shot some time.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    There are a few story-threads in the book that are either glossed over (or completely omitted) from the movie; and the movie (despite its runtime) still feels quite rushed.

    If reading isn’t your thing, maybe see if you can’t get your hands on the audiobook and give that a crack on your commutes/lunch breaks/whenever.

    Having both read the book (in anticipation of the movie), and having seen the film - I definitely enjoyed both at a solid 5/5, but can fully understand if it’s not for everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    If reading isn’t your thing,

    It is, there's just quite a long queue of books waiting for my attention at the moment!
    I'm interested in the film because of its use of practical effects vs. CGI, not so much the story. But it sounds like the story is worthwhile on its own.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    every moment after the 10min mark is predictable. feels like i have watched this movie several times in other holywood blockbusters.

  • source