you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 36 points 5 months ago (16 children)

Vials were put next to each other in the centrifuge.

Unwatchable.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    OH MY GOD NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT THIS AND I'M NOT EVEN A BIOLOGIST!!!

    Edit: OR A CHEMIST

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Then you don't know that there's such a thing as a self balancing centrifuge.

    People who get hung up on this particular detail need to get over it. 🫩

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    It may be less about what the centrifuge can do and more about the culture surrounding centrifuges. It's my impression that people who are in a position to be using a centrifuge balance them out of habit. Even if they don't need to.

    Not balancing them (in the event that it is a self balancing one) may be similar to computer science debates about tabs vs spaces. A difference that's more cultural than important.

    I could be wrong, biology isn't my field. This is just my impression from having watched this debate play out several times.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    That one was not a self-balancing centrifuge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I think this is a detail done on purpose. Presumably they actually just filmed a centrifuge, instead of faking it somehow. That means it must have been balanced, which means they balanced it another way just to film the "mistake." I think it's to get people to talk about this, which is incredibly minor, so people talk about how accurate it is by only having one stupid thing to complain about. Negatives spread a lot easier than positives on the internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Presumably they actually just filmed a centrifuge, instead of faking it somehow.

    Why buy a real one? It doesn't need to work. They spent $20 attaching a disk with holes to a motor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Maybe. It was a lot more than that though. It had the shell and everything else. I suspect it'd be cheaper and easier to just buy or borrow a real one, even if it's not usable as lab equipment anymore. It's not like they're super uncommon.

    Also, that still needs to be balanced to some degree if it's spinning reasonably quickly. It doesn't just suddenly not impart a lot of force because it's a "fake" centrifuge.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment