all 91 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 5 months ago (8 children)

But think of billionaires' bottom lines!

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago* (7 children)

    I don't live in the US so mostly I'm thinking of who's gonna pay for my retirement and healthcare when I'm old.

    I'm paying for the current old people's retirement and healthcare. That's fine, it's the social contract we have in our nation: everyone gets taken care of and those who can work, pay a lot of tax to make it happen. If the population decline gets bad enough, there will be no one to do the same for my generation.

    Oh and they populist conservatives did a pension reform so you can take out whatever you've gathered in your second pillar even at age 20 if you want (at which point it'll probably be in the hundreds of euros lol) and can't resume payments (which were matched by the government - you pay 2, 4 or 6 percent and government pays 4% of your gross income) for 10 years. Worst deal ever for most people taking it out if they want to retire at one point. And a third of the population took it out. They now have to fully depend on the first pillar (government) pension, which isn't based on past investments at all, it's taken from the working population's social taxes when you retire. So far more directly affected by the population decline. I'm betting they'll eventually forcibly fuck it up for the rest of us to pay for the retirements of those who took it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Most countries have billionaires pulling strings at the top.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    The only real billionaires of my country are the founders of Wise and Bolt. They all made their money from startups that succeeded internationally and none of them particularly politically active. One of the Wise guys is actually building a car-free "five minute city" block in the capital. The biggest problem is a actually a guy with under 100 million net worth who runs a small bank (called bigbank, ironically), keeps donating to the conservatives and his individual contributions are like 10-20% of the entire country's political donations put together or something. It's like eroding LGBT rights is his life goal or something.

    All that doesn't change the fact that since the population is aging, rather than people of all ages dying off evenly at once, things will get harder to maintain, as everything we enjoy in life still requires someone to do work, regardless of economic system - and old people still require resources to maintain (and more labour to maintain than young people)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    You understand that money is a fiction, right? It’s not even numbers on a piece of paper anymore, it’s ones and zeroes.

    Fewer people means more resources per person and less damage to the earth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    The "resources" we rely on require (working) humans, less working humans means less resources. The population we have today won't disappear all at once but when they age out of the workforce, a smaller population will not be able to support them

    In other words, if we are below replacement level, we will eventually have a situation where the old outnumber the young, which means that the young have to work harder to support the old

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    The biggest concern right now is the looming massive unemployment crisis and you're worried about too much demand for work?

    And how does fewer working people decrease resources? Fewer working peole means less land? Less water? Less energy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    The biggest concern right now is the looming massive unemployment crisis and you’re worried about too much demand for work?

    It's a two sided issue. We're laying off a bunch of people in jobs that require thinking, but not doing stuff in the physical world. But jobs that require doing physical things are still much more difficult to automate if it requires any sort of flexibility to conditions. We'll still need people in a bunch of roles, they'll just be jobs people won't want to do as much, because it'll be dirtier and harder work. And of course in our present economic system at present time, these jobs aren't very highly paid since we don't have a real shortage of workers yet.

    And how does fewer working people decrease resources? Fewer working peole means less land? Less water? Less energy?

    Land on its own doesn't produce much useful, you still need people to work it. Power plants need employees too. Etc. There are still so, so many things we can't accomplish without humans physically present and moving objects. Automation makes things more efficient, but we still need humans.

    If the population of the world shrunk evenly in all ages, it wouldn't be an issue. It's only an issue because the population is aging.

    And yes, in the future we'll probably have AI doctors, AI teachers and AI engineers to provide us mediocre healthcare, education and help invent stuff. But we won't have AI electricians or AI plumbers anytime soon. Much harder problems to automate.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Tax-funded retirement is fucked, but like, who still thinks they're having one.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago

    Yay! Less humans to create less suffering!

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    The oligarchs haven't figured that out quite yet. They want to starve us out of existence, but still want to pig out at the government troughs. Where is that money going to come from when all the jobs are being done by AI and robots?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    See that's the neat part when it comes to tech oligarchs, specifically. They believe in TESCREAL/Transhumanism so they're aiming to become the AI robots! YAY! /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    By the time things reach that point, it could be too late. TESCREALists are like planetary eugenicists. You know how Thiel couldn't answer the question about whether humanity should live in that one interview? He's not the only one. Their fantasy of what comes next will never work, but that doesn't mean they won't do unfathomable harm to the globe trying to make their sick dreams come true.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    they think they can just have robot slaves or humans slaves in thier little enclaves. in almost all cases, fiction media goes, both groups end up rebelling anyways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    There are 8.3 Billion people on the planet and there were 7.5 ten years ago. We have enough people. We have enough resources for everyone to live comfortably and be well in their communities. We have more than enough money and other valuable things to trade.

    The main thing getting in our way isn't a low birth rate.

    Anyone genuinely concerned with the depopulation of humans in 2026 is probably some flavour of breeder cult weirdo, and the only ones constantly banging on about it in politics, academia, the news, etc are imperialists, industrialists and racist patriarchs. IME.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I agree with you that there are too many people on this world, and yes, we can do with way less.

    Having said that

    A little bit lower that the 2.1 birthrate is fine, A very low birth rate is very bad for everyone. Sudden changed on demographics will fuck your country up and can make it disappear in a hundred years without you realizing it until it's too late

    Demographics is like a slow moving cargo train, you only hear some humming and then some blaring and then when it hits you it won't stop or even slow down for a second

    Countries like South Korea are at risk for their very existence and really should act now to avoid the day that North Korea can just walk in because they won't have enough people left to even take care of themselves

    China has a similar problem and it's bad. They have a huge amount of people becoming old and unable to add to the economy anymore and requiring more and more help from others... That means that more money will go out to the old, and there is less money for the young to get kids and add to the next generation. This is in part why there are so few kids these days, it's simply too expensive to have any.

    Lowering your population slowly and carefully is fine. Having your population drop off a cliff like it's happening in many counties world wide is a disaster

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    But what about the orphan grinder? Wont somebody think of the orphan grinder?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I am more than willing to fix the declining birth rates in every country but nobody is accepting my offers =/

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    But there’ll be fewer workers for the oligarchs to lay off! How are they going to signal to shareholders that operating costs will be lower next quarter?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    Not a problem unless you were counting on collecting social security

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I don't know if I plan on being around that long

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    You could withhold your taxes but doing that would be too large an action for most Americans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    Millenials and younger don't tend to include retirement in their plans. Death is the plan for us, 100 million in America is all that is planned, should AI not pan out.

    The rest of the world, they plan to exterminate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    That last sentence is not clear. Who is planning and who is exterminating? American Millenials are exterminating the rest of the world? The rest of the world is planning to exterminate... someone? Their own population?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I can't think of anything more irresponsible and selfish than procreation in the 21st century. Why would anyone want to end their own life and subject themselves to the stress of ensuring their craft human survives and becomes a relatively average coal miner.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago* (10 children)

    I make it my personal responsibility in life to constantly bring up the necessity of immigration as the solution to age disparity and population decline. There are working people. There are as many as you could ever need, tens of millions, perhaps hundreds. It's never going to be an issue which can't be solved with immigration.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I don't see how this is a solution so much as delaying the problem for future generations to deal with. What happens when the countries the immigrants are coming from start to face the same issue (if it isn't happening for them already?) It's basically the population equivalent of the "one more lane bro" philosophy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    It is absolutely happening already. Many of those countries are experiencing issues with being below replacement and a hollowing out of their workforce at the same time. For many, they have gotten old before they got rich, which will make further advancements difficult.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    Dude, immigration is the root cause for a whole range of problems if not done correctly. See prime example germany.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    Polite so long as you're white, the canadian way. Ask a mounty for a starlight tour sometime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Crazy that we live in a world where you can watch the damage of demographic shifts in real time, and that's still not enough to convince you that it's a problem.

    The modern world doesn't scale down, and we have yet to figure out a solution.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    I'm personally aware that this is a pretty serious problem. I'm also aware I'm not the one who caused it, nor is it my duty to solve it. Answers have been proposed and ignored, so I'm not having kids. Oligarchs get no slaves from me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    If growth doesn't compensate for shrinking working population, you'll be fucked. Somone has to work so you have your retirement.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    well most countries have below-replacement births anyways.

  • source
  • [+] -17 points 5 months ago (21 children)

    I hate to break it to you YuckyTom but no matter how you slice it a declining birth rate means a shittier situation for you in your retirement. Most people who think about anything other than retweets and boobs care about this.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (11 children)
  • [+] -6 points 5 months ago (10 children)

    Ok, imagine I said twilight years.

    You may not "retire" but inevitably there will be a period before you die where you are less productive and generally less able than you previously were.

    When you reach this period, the more people there are being productive and paying taxes the better your circumstances will be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    The more people there are being productive, the better off the billionaires will be. You are going to be fucked regardless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Don't you want to be less fucked?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I don't think it matters much. My generation will have to come up with a retirement plan on its own and whether the government can cover 0, 10 or 20 percent of the basic cost of living makes almost no difference to me. I expect that I will basically have to cover everything on my own or maybe go to jail for free food.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    I can assure you that our endless growth model will make things really shitty by the time I retire. In fact, it's possible our endless growth model has already made my retirement irreperably shitty.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Unless you've already retired, you likely never will.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 7 comments in c/memes@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

    My folks asked me why I wasn't worried about being replaced in "our own country" and I told them that because I like the getting new types of fast food every few years and it is constant immigration that has brought that into my life.

    i prefer a good banh mi and tacos de lengua over blood and soil any day.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago

    The issue is that people cant afford to have kids and governments have opted to increase immigration to cover that up.

    Immigrants are obviously not to blame but there is growing inequity meaning parenthood is not afforded to everyone. Its fucked up

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    The only reason elites are worried about declining birthrates is because whenever working class population dips Corpos are forced to pay fair wages and government to charge wealth tax and give worker protection and all.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago

    Lower population only threatens those who depend on populations, like leeches and parasites and vampires.

  • source