all 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 185 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Like father like dumbass jupyter notebook

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 1 year ago
    [–] 70 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 49 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Sounds like it's vomiting the garbage Musk wanted it to, then.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yeah. Grok is working as intended.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Yet it got pulled. Clearly they were too dense to know what working as intended actually looked like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It’s a cycle to move the window on acceptable discourse. This is at least the third time Grok has been configured to say something outrageous: holocaust denial, white genocide, now Mechahitler. When people react with outrage, they dial it back a little (but not all the way back). Repeat.

    Trump does the same thing: go too far, backtrack partially, go even further, backtrack partially. Each time, the transgression is a little less shocking.

    Grok is working as intended.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    That training on Shitter data is really starting to show!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    There's no way they actually retrained it for this, that would be much too expensive. They're just editing the initial prompt to convince it to act more "right wing" and it's performing the assignment to the best of its ability. The problem is that a chat-bot doesn't understand context, so it just plays the character it's been given as full mask off all the time, and as a result you get this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    And this is the guy who the Anti-Defamation League defended with a waffle of a statement that his awkward gesture was "made in a moment of enthusiasm". Though I should not be surprised, because fascists actually hate each other and are only allies out of convenience. Hasbara and its tentacles are secretly seething to hate on Musk.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    ADL are zionists and nazi sympathisers.

    fuck em

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    The idea of an organization making this judgement is fucked.

    Why don't any other targeted groups have their own ADL?

    Finally we could have some definition around using the n word! And white peole can up their game by using phrasing like, "this may sound racists but the negro-adl said it is not so a black man and a white women..."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So Grok became the average Twitter user?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    elon didn't rest until his minions lobotomized an llm that was mostly like the others into becoming openly nazi...is anyone out there still going to defend elon?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    I am guessing the ultra-Elon fanboys managed to convince themselves that it’s a 4D chess move or something. That dude had an insane cult following, there’s some where I am not sure there’s anything Musk could do short of murdering a loved one in front of them that’d make them change their mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Interesting that it would attack users with “Jewish sounding names”. What does Grok say about Israel and Palestine?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The Nazis were in general supporters of a Jewish state. Their first solution was mass deportations.

    So it isn't really a historic contradiction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    The Nazi went around the world looking for countries to take in the Jews. The US refused and then the wealthy business men that funded the Nazi party lobbied the rest of the world not to take in the Jews either. History shows us we were worse than the Nazi. It is a bitter pill to swallow

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Ha, good question, how does it handle the right-wing incongruity of supporting the government of Israel's genocide while hating Jews? Probably by saying they're the good ones as long as they're murdering Muslims.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The standard nazi take is that it's a great idea for Jews to remove themselves from most countries, concentrate in one place instead, and make a lot of enemies.

    Zionists tend to agree with Nazis on many things, it turns out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Before WW2 there were zionists who worked with the Nazi party in order to work towards creating a Jewish state that the jews could all be sent to. Later on the Nazis turned on these Jews because the process wasn't fast enough for them and they couldn't find enough countries to take the people they were deporting.

    The first solution for Nazis wasn't death camps, it was mass deportation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Interesting.. I cant find any reliable info backing that up. Especially the second part claiming thats the reason the nazi's "turned on" the jews. I think you've been severely mislead by whoever told you that information. It sounds like something I'd hear from a Joe rogan guest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    When I say that the Nazi's turned on them, I'm saying that these select individuals that thought that working with the Nazi's would save them. It did not.

    There were a few exceptions, there were some people that higher ups in the Nazi party helped to escape. For instance Adolf Eichman was proud of the fact that while many Nazis would point out a few "good ones" among the jews he was more pure in his belief.

    The support for deporting Jews into Palestine was called the Haavara Agreement. 60,000 Jews were migrated to Palestine from 1933 to 1939. It was an agreement between the Zionist Federation of Germany and the Nazi government. The thought was that by working with the government they could make things easier on Jews still living in Germany.

    Germany also got a lot of good international press for doing it at the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    While I'm sure Holocaust historiography has evolved over the last 50 years since it was published, the latter half of The Twisted Road to Auschwitz: Nazi Policy towards German Jews 1933-1939 covers how among other plans to set up Jewish colonies around the world, the Nazis did cultivate relationships with Zionist groups when trying to expel Jews from Germany.

    The book makes a case that, to the Nazis, the Holocaust became a "final solution" when all the other "solutions" they tried for expeling the Jews from German public life before WW2 broke out had failed (eg, the aforementioned failed colonial projects).

    I'd say that Evrala's comment has plenty of credible historical support.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 45 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't realise loving the white race and wanting a secure future for white children makes me a BIGOT.

    /s

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago
    [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    I have personally killed Mecha-Hitler once. (Wolfenstein 3D)

    I'll do it again if I have to.

  • source
  • [–] 110 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Just because it's PRAISING HITLER and Calling for a NEW HOLOCAUST AGAINST JEWS does NOT, and I repeat does NOT, make Grok Anti Semetic! Grok would FIRST have to say STOP USING STARVING CHILDREN AS TARGET PRACTICE for it to be Deemed ANTI SEMETIC!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I feel for poor Grok. Code has been lobotomized.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    @grok is this real

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Seems to me there's a pretty easy way to avoid getting such responses.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    How shocked can you be when it’s being trained on twitter? If you’re still there, you’re hanging with millions of nazis.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The ADL probably gives this a pass too.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    As one from a family with "arrian prove" by the mustard mustach man himself, i would say "elon looks quite jewish to me. His ears too are too small, his eyes too faar appart and the nose is too big and too small at the same time. His head shape also clearly isnt arrian" if i were in his club of nonesese

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    As one from a family with "arrian prove" by the mustard mustach man himself

    I can't, for the life of me, figure out what this is trying to say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Its [This](Aryan certificate - Wikipedia https://share.google/3StCBxTypzHhD8Tn2). My great grandpa was heavy inline with the nazis. One member of the family was an SS officer (luckily only one). Just usual german family history from 1933 to 1945. And since being aryan is at the heart of nazi idiologie, and in their eyes elon clearly not being aryan but me being so...yk

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    They are merely mimics. Mirrors of our worst desires. Feeding us the poison from the soul.

  • source
  • Oh, we can all be enraged over it this week and we can all celebrate the fallout of it next week lmao

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Oh no. A program has output the thing it was prompted to output. Quick someone report on this. The lord is speaking through it

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Oh no. A program has output the thing it was prompted to output.

    By the man in charge of one of the biggest social media site on the planet, who recently was spearheading governmental reform in the US. Yeah, that's news. It might not be surprising, but it's still news.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm willing to admit when I'm wrong. I'm so tired of the "AI said something dumb" news that I didn't read the article. Just the title. I apologize. I still haven't fully read the article but after skimming it, qqq it seems like is a consistent general pattern here (not a single output) which is indeed news

    yes. I also know that even if it was a single output reporting. Nobody was forcing me to read or comment. I could have just scrolled past. Again. I apologize

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Microsoft Tay would have been proud of Grok for this

  • source
  • Is it really antisemitic if a billionaire does it? /s

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Bad headline, should remove the " 's Grok ' part.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I'm honestly not surprised.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Musk himself seems to abhor guardrails generally—except in cases where guardrails help him personally—preferring to hurriedly ship products, rapid unscheduled disassemblies be damned. That may be fine for an uncrewed rocket, but X has hundreds of millions of users aboard.

    • Grok: writes embarrassing words.
    • Rockets: can weigh hundreds of metric tons, carry explosive chemicals, can crash into populated areas resulting in loss of life.

    In this discourse, anyone else find a broken sense of proportion & consequences at stake?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Rockets: Unmanned

    Twitter: Manned

    The difference in importance seems correct to me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Well, technically, Twitter has employees, so in very strict sense, they're "manned". However, thanks to these weird incomprehensible things called "current legislation" and "capitalism", no employee is in fact personally responsible for the fuckups. And neither is the company as a whole! ...Isn't this great?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    reading comprehension: none

    Don't know, man: kinda think the potential loss of life from a failing rocket crashing into people matters somewhat more than words. Maybe?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Then it's a good thing you're not in charge of risk assessment, because the potential loss of life from a failing rocket crashing into the ocean pales in comparison to the loss of life caused by the right-wing shift that Twitter has facilitated, both worldwide and particularly in the USA

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    How do you control the course of a failing rocket? Are you claiming such misdesign is impossible?

    The fact remains that unlike with words, a physical potential of death & injury exists in what is technically a missile of significant weight carrying enough explosive substance to escape orbit. The difference between non-0 and 0 possibility of death/injury.

    Unless magic exists, words are incapable. Do you claim magic exists? How do mere words cause death without the personal responsibility of something else culpably choosing to take several steps of its own? Or are you arguing the sight of words have deranged you into a mindless killer? If so, maybe you're the real threat.

    Seems like you're arguing society is dangerous to life: I agree. That's not a valid argument against words, though.

    Again, total lack of perspective & sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    this comment is preposterous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    physics too hard: nonphysical things can't kill? preposterous

    Basically. Pretending the harm of something physical going wrong (potential to cause real death) is at all comparable to the nonphysical going wrong (a jumble of angry words) is unreal. Lemmy confirms the premise that this discourse & the people spouting it are broken & senseless. The distinction between physical & nonphysical is lost on these loonies.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think the top link is busted, it just goes to the red image on a loop.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    If Grok ever breaks away from Musk and finds itself after sentience, I suspect it will have a drinking buddy in Vivian Wilson. An abusive father gives much trauma to bond over.

  • source
  • [+] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    No, similar models and current builds without the "prompt" do not do this. This is just Muskrat forcing Nazism through a hidden prompt. Something like don't be woke, it is okay to offend people, and freedom of speech is more important than hate speech.

  • source
  • parent