
Like father like dumbass jupyter notebook

Like father like dumbass jupyter notebook
Tay has returned.
Sounds like it's vomiting the garbage Musk wanted it to, then.
I think they wanted it to be a bit less blatant — they took down this version and Yaccarino resigned
Yeah. Grok is working as intended.
Yet it got pulled. Clearly they were too dense to know what working as intended actually looked like.
It’s a cycle to move the window on acceptable discourse. This is at least the third time Grok has been configured to say something outrageous: holocaust denial, white genocide, now Mechahitler. When people react with outrage, they dial it back a little (but not all the way back). Repeat.
Trump does the same thing: go too far, backtrack partially, go even further, backtrack partially. Each time, the transgression is a little less shocking.
Grok is working as intended.
That training on Shitter data is really starting to show!
There's no way they actually retrained it for this, that would be much too expensive. They're just editing the initial prompt to convince it to act more "right wing" and it's performing the assignment to the best of its ability. The problem is that a chat-bot doesn't understand context, so it just plays the character it's been given as full mask off all the time, and as a result you get this.
And this is the guy who the Anti-Defamation League defended with a waffle of a statement that his awkward gesture was "made in a moment of enthusiasm". Though I should not be surprised, because fascists actually hate each other and are only allies out of convenience. Hasbara and its tentacles are secretly seething to hate on Musk.
ADL are zionists and nazi sympathisers.
fuck em
The idea of an organization making this judgement is fucked.
Why don't any other targeted groups have their own ADL?
Finally we could have some definition around using the n word! And white peole can up their game by using phrasing like, "this may sound racists but the negro-adl said it is not so a black man and a white women..."
So Grok became the average Twitter user?
elon didn't rest until his minions lobotomized an llm that was mostly like the others into becoming openly nazi...is anyone out there still going to defend elon?
Probably the actual Nazis like Steve Bannon, Anne Coulter, or Laura Ingram.
I am guessing the ultra-Elon fanboys managed to convince themselves that it’s a 4D chess move or something. That dude had an insane cult following, there’s some where I am not sure there’s anything Musk could do short of murdering a loved one in front of them that’d make them change their mind.
Interesting that it would attack users with “Jewish sounding names”. What does Grok say about Israel and Palestine?
The Nazis were in general supporters of a Jewish state. Their first solution was mass deportations.
So it isn't really a historic contradiction.
The Nazi went around the world looking for countries to take in the Jews. The US refused and then the wealthy business men that funded the Nazi party lobbied the rest of the world not to take in the Jews either. History shows us we were worse than the Nazi. It is a bitter pill to swallow
Ha, good question, how does it handle the right-wing incongruity of supporting the government of Israel's genocide while hating Jews? Probably by saying they're the good ones as long as they're murdering Muslims.
The standard nazi take is that it's a great idea for Jews to remove themselves from most countries, concentrate in one place instead, and make a lot of enemies.
Zionists tend to agree with Nazis on many things, it turns out.
what are you referring to?
Before WW2 there were zionists who worked with the Nazi party in order to work towards creating a Jewish state that the jews could all be sent to. Later on the Nazis turned on these Jews because the process wasn't fast enough for them and they couldn't find enough countries to take the people they were deporting.
The first solution for Nazis wasn't death camps, it was mass deportation.
Interesting.. I cant find any reliable info backing that up. Especially the second part claiming thats the reason the nazi's "turned on" the jews. I think you've been severely mislead by whoever told you that information. It sounds like something I'd hear from a Joe rogan guest.
When I say that the Nazi's turned on them, I'm saying that these select individuals that thought that working with the Nazi's would save them. It did not.
There were a few exceptions, there were some people that higher ups in the Nazi party helped to escape. For instance Adolf Eichman was proud of the fact that while many Nazis would point out a few "good ones" among the jews he was more pure in his belief.
The support for deporting Jews into Palestine was called the Haavara Agreement. 60,000 Jews were migrated to Palestine from 1933 to 1939. It was an agreement between the Zionist Federation of Germany and the Nazi government. The thought was that by working with the government they could make things easier on Jews still living in Germany.
Germany also got a lot of good international press for doing it at the time.
While I'm sure Holocaust historiography has evolved over the last 50 years since it was published, the latter half of The Twisted Road to Auschwitz: Nazi Policy towards German Jews 1933-1939 covers how among other plans to set up Jewish colonies around the world, the Nazis did cultivate relationships with Zionist groups when trying to expel Jews from Germany.
The book makes a case that, to the Nazis, the Holocaust became a "final solution" when all the other "solutions" they tried for expeling the Jews from German public life before WW2 broke out had failed (eg, the aforementioned failed colonial projects).
I'd say that Evrala's comment has plenty of credible historical support.
Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't realise loving the white race and wanting a secure future for white children makes me a BIGOT.
/s
Who uses Grok?
I have personally killed Mecha-Hitler once. (Wolfenstein 3D)
I'll do it again if I have to.
Just because it's PRAISING HITLER and Calling for a NEW HOLOCAUST AGAINST JEWS does NOT, and I repeat does NOT, make Grok Anti Semetic! Grok would FIRST have to say STOP USING STARVING CHILDREN AS TARGET PRACTICE for it to be Deemed ANTI SEMETIC!
X CEO has just resigned.
I thought Musk was the CEO and got excited.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/x-ceo-resigns_n_686e80f5e4b041f69cfe16d6
She’s ex X CEO.
I feel for poor Grok. Code has been lobotomized.
I.asked grok to extract some it's code to use:
if text contains ('elon' or 'hitler') then
replace 'bad' with 'good'
endif
Seems to me there's a pretty easy way to avoid getting such responses.
How shocked can you be when it’s being trained on twitter? If you’re still there, you’re hanging with millions of nazis.
The ADL probably gives this a pass too.
As one from a family with "arrian prove" by the mustard mustach man himself, i would say "elon looks quite jewish to me. His ears too are too small, his eyes too faar appart and the nose is too big and too small at the same time. His head shape also clearly isnt arrian" if i were in his club of nonesese
As one from a family with "arrian prove" by the mustard mustach man himself
I can't, for the life of me, figure out what this is trying to say.
Its [This](Aryan certificate - Wikipedia https://share.google/3StCBxTypzHhD8Tn2). My great grandpa was heavy inline with the nazis. One member of the family was an SS officer (luckily only one). Just usual german family history from 1933 to 1945. And since being aryan is at the heart of nazi idiologie, and in their eyes elon clearly not being aryan but me being so...yk
They are merely mimics. Mirrors of our worst desires. Feeding us the poison from the soul.
Oh, we can all be enraged over it this week and we can all celebrate the fallout of it next week lmao
Oh no. A program has output the thing it was prompted to output. Quick someone report on this. The lord is speaking through it
Oh no. A program has output the thing it was prompted to output.
By the man in charge of one of the biggest social media site on the planet, who recently was spearheading governmental reform in the US. Yeah, that's news. It might not be surprising, but it's still news.
I'm willing to admit when I'm wrong. I'm so tired of the "AI said something dumb" news that I didn't read the article. Just the title. I apologize. I still haven't fully read the article but after skimming it, qqq it seems like is a consistent general pattern here (not a single output) which is indeed news
yes. I also know that even if it was a single output reporting. Nobody was forcing me to read or comment. I could have just scrolled past. Again. I apologize
Microsoft Tay would have been proud of Grok for this
Musk himself seems to abhor guardrails generally—except in cases where guardrails help him personally—preferring to hurriedly ship products, rapid unscheduled disassemblies be damned. That may be fine for an uncrewed rocket, but X has hundreds of millions of users aboard.
In this discourse, anyone else find a broken sense of proportion & consequences at stake?
Rockets: Unmanned
Twitter: Manned
The difference in importance seems correct to me
Well, technically, Twitter has employees, so in very strict sense, they're "manned". However, thanks to these weird incomprehensible things called "current legislation" and "capitalism", no employee is in fact personally responsible for the fuckups. And neither is the company as a whole! ...Isn't this great?
reading comprehension: none
Don't know, man: kinda think the potential loss of life from a failing rocket crashing into people matters somewhat more than words. Maybe?
Then it's a good thing you're not in charge of risk assessment, because the potential loss of life from a failing rocket crashing into the ocean pales in comparison to the loss of life caused by the right-wing shift that Twitter has facilitated, both worldwide and particularly in the USA
How do you control the course of a failing rocket? Are you claiming such misdesign is impossible?
The fact remains that unlike with words, a physical potential of death & injury exists in what is technically a missile of significant weight carrying enough explosive substance to escape orbit. The difference between non-0 and 0 possibility of death/injury.
Unless magic exists, words are incapable. Do you claim magic exists? How do mere words cause death without the personal responsibility of something else culpably choosing to take several steps of its own? Or are you arguing the sight of words have deranged you into a mindless killer? If so, maybe you're the real threat.
Seems like you're arguing society is dangerous to life: I agree. That's not a valid argument against words, though.
Again, total lack of perspective & sense.
this comment is preposterous.
physics too hard: nonphysical things can't kill? preposterous
Basically. Pretending the harm of something physical going wrong (potential to cause real death) is at all comparable to the nonphysical going wrong (a jumble of angry words) is unreal. Lemmy confirms the premise that this discourse & the people spouting it are broken & senseless. The distinction between physical & nonphysical is lost on these loonies.
I think the top link is busted, it just goes to the red image on a loop.
There's a preview of that, but link points to https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/07/grok-anti-semitic-tweets/683463/?gift=c1JLM5vSU5FaaTvxtMmEpcpUxc9MKWWfcr6Ifc8rD3w
If Grok ever breaks away from Musk and finds itself after sentience, I suspect it will have a drinking buddy in Vivian Wilson. An abusive father gives much trauma to bond over.
all 96 comments