top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 179 points 6 months ago (18 children)

From my brief skim of the article it seems like they're worried that poor people not being able to afford anything will mean less profits for big businesses.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 111 points 6 months ago (14 children)

    Do you think they'll ever realize that there are so many poor people that can't afford anything anymore because those same companies have spent 60+ years ensuring wages stay exactly where they were while prices increased?

    I doubt it. It's clear that to be a CEO you need to have zero problem solving skills, just social connections and rich parents (usually). It's the rest of the management team below the C-Suite that has does the thinking. Then middle manglement fucks up implementing it to try and get noticed for a promotion from their dead-end position because they aren't a part of the rich club already.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 6 months ago*

    If I'm correctly reading into the history and motivations of corporations, this is part of them donning their hot dog suit and saying that they're trying to figure out why everyone is mysteriously poor.

    After that, they'll put on a ROCK/BAND shirt, a backwards hat, and carry a skateboard before explaining that this "poor" is hitting everyone the same. And they'll lay off thousands or millions more than they already have

    Then...
    money_please.gif

    After proving once again that they're the "job makers," they'll get their emergency loans, buy out weaker competition, and everyone will accuse them of foul play.

    Finally, they'll hire everyone back at fractions of their previous pay, even though the cost of living will have disproportionately risen as well. People will fight, there will be strikes, and then the bleed will be slowed, but not stopped, by the companies "giving in to demands" that are actually neutered facsimiles of the original bargaining proposals. But everyone will be too tired and poor to continue fighting. We'll all ask our politicians how this could have happened and why they still trust the corporations. Then we get to watch the old song and dance all over again:

    iveneverdoneanythingwrongeverinmylife.gif
    iknowthisandiloveyou.gif
    money_please(1).gif

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    Thats not what's going on.

    Retailers have commissioned surveys to determine that people are already out of money.

    They use this to create a narrative and promote the idea that additional interest rate rises are unnecessary because people are already broke to additional interest rate hikes will just create a recession.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago*

    besides tech, most other stem jobs are pretty stagnant and low to begin with. yea trades might good for some people, that arnt prone to physical ailements but it seems its much more geared towards white people instead, plus the conservative culture of the industry. in construction is quite uncommon to see an asian person working there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    those same companies have spent 60+ years ensuring wages stay exactly where they were while prices increased?

    This is not true.

    Wages in the US adjusted for prices have generally been going up - but slowly - even since Reagan. This remains true - broadly - even if you look at the lowest income decile, but the growth is less:

    image

    So wages were stagnant for the bottom decile from 1980 to 2016, but rose since then. It is, however, not even correct to say that "wages stayed the same but prices went up" between 1980 and 2016, because those are inflation-adjusted figures: the price increases are already factored in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    The graphic shows rising inequality, which is what trickle down delivers. Don't downvote just because I don't entirely agree with every mad claim that has an anti-capitalist vibe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 101 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    The parasites are killing their hosts.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 87 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    CEOs Are 'Hoarding All The Profits' and Not Raising Wages, Workers Warn

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    CEOs warn, sitting on their third yacht, planning their fourth.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    “I might have to delay the purchase of my 5th yacht by 2 months!”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 6 months ago
    [–] 46 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    they're so close to figuring out that a rising tide lifts all ships and why a min wage increase/paying livable wages in general would actually be a good thing for their bottom line. So close.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 6 months ago (17 children)

    None of these fuckers think long term. it's all quarter by quarter. I see it in my job even with startups. Build something now, use AI, it works now? great. it won't scale a year or two down the line? that's a problem for future me.

    Are we making money now? great. what do you mean a year or two down the line there will be no one left that makes enough money to buy our shit? that's a problem for future me.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    The last corporate job I had before going into business myself, was as a sales manager for a Fortune 100 company.

    It was very common at the end of a quarter to have to call around to wholesale customers, and beg them to take a pallette of some poorly selling sku, telling them "Don't even unwrap it. Just stick it in a corner of the warehouse, and when the quarter turns, I'll authorize a return of the inventory, and give you a discount on something else to make up for the trouble."

    Did it all the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I made a ton of money building reporting systems which made it simple to identify this form of gaming sales numbers to fit targets.

    Thank you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    So the bosses would know I was doing that? Who do you think told me to do it? LOL.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Yeah, my company is chasing an IPO and so is slashing wages. People are leaving in droves, but since it makes number go up…

    No care whatsoever about post IPO. It’s going to be awful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    God, how I love people who throw acronyms around expecting everyone to know them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    IPO: initial public offering. Means when a private business goes public (and is therefore able to be traded on the stock market). The CEO loses a lot of their stock during the process, so it's in the CEO's best interest to rugpull as hard as possible during an IPO so that they can cash out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    thats what spez did with REDDIT, he made hundreds of millions as soon IPO happened, now he needs to keep afloat long enough to be an entrenched propaganda machine, while still earning from advertisements, or funding by propaganda groups.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago

    "I'll just make a well timed bet on my company declaring bankruptcy right before we release a dumpster fire earnings report and ride off into the sunset. I'm a good person who makes the world a better place, my child's little league coach told me so when I took my turn buying pizza for the team."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    they are all pretty much run like a PE firm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Steve Jobs actually mentioned this happens when leadership comes from a sales focused, rather then product focused, background. Everything becomes short term thinking, and then they dip when they see/reach the inflection point of their profit growth, and blame the inevitable company failure on the next guy

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 6 months ago

    Lol they aren't concerned with people "running out of money" they're concerned nobody will buy their products. Which could be solved by giving people more money but that's not an option for them.

    Klarna and 8 year car loans are just the beginning. Trump was serious when he said we should do 100 year mortgages, THAT is the solution they are looking for. Not, "how can we get people more money to buy things". But more "how can we get people with no money to continue buying things".

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Executives across retail, restaurants and packaged goods are increasingly worried about US shoppers with tighter budgets amid surging gas prices caused by the conflict in the Middle East.

    “They’re literally running out of money at the end of the month,” Kraft Heinz Co. Chief Executive Officer Steve Cahillane said in an interview this week. “We’re seeing negative cash flows in the lower-income brackets where they’re dipping into savings.”

    DIPPING INTO SAVINGS???! WTF are they smoking?! I don't know many people with a cushion of savings let alone a comfortable one; especially lately since our pay has stagnated, job market's trash, and EVERYTHING has risen in price! Who's got the ability to even attempt to save?!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, it's the surging gas prices. Sure, CEO man.

    These idiots are so out of touch. $40 more a month in gas compared to 3 years ago isn't what's breaking me. It's the $800/mo more in rent. It's the $300/month more in groceries. It's my electrical bill doubling because of a new AI slopcenter in my backyard. It's being told by my boss that this quarter's record profits weren't record enough to fund a measly 2% raise for me.

    But sure, my dude Mr. Kraft CEO. Blame the gas boogeyman.

    I wonder how marbled Mr. Cahillaine's sirloin is? Maybe it would be good with some Heinz 57 sauce.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago

    the stone is no longer bleeding! hit it harder!

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 6 months ago

    NGL, I’ve been training for the hunts of the upcoming, “bunker era”.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 6 months ago

    CEOs should stop warning and start giving living wages. Fucking parasites.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I have yet to read or hear of one CEO who ever deserved a godawfully huge bonus, but they do stick together those cunning rats. While it is true that most citizens have been "capitalized" out of even the spare nickels and dimes they had kicking around, the best the CEO can do is say "Our customers don't have any money", not why they don't have any money. Fuck those big bonuses. The market is wild and out of control and has been forever so what exactly are those bonuses for...fluke profit?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 51 points 6 months ago

    Remember, if it’s not from the Dépression region, it’s just sparking recession

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago

    Oh great! Another 'CEO says something' article. :-/

  • source
  • [+] 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    Oh, do the CEOs finally realize that underpaid workers, AI agents and robots don't go on shopping sprees?
    They should raise their pay for that nobel prize worthy brilliance.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Oh man, a shopping spree... Unless it's food, I don't make a purchase without considering it for at least 6 months before hand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I'm really sorry about the hardships you face that are representative of an ongoing development over the last decades.
    Moving more and ever more wealth into the pockets of the Epstein class is making that wealth missing elsewhere - the people who create that wealth by working are devoid of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I must have made it sound harder than it is, but my household income is well above the poverty line, and I don't have any kids. Even with that financial flexibility though, I still can't afford to spend recklessly.

    Let's put it this way, my last big "non-necessary" purchase was a firearm, and I literally reviewed it and considered it for 3 years. For a less than 1000 dollar purchase.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    I think it's hard enough and harder than it had to be.
    There's plenty of wealth, food, housing, etc. but it's not fairly distributed and the distribution just gets more and more skewed due to tax rules and other regulations in favor of the richᵀᴹ.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Unless it's an immediate, justifiable need, say washing machine breaks down and using a laundromat for six months would eat up money better spent for the washing machine, this is just a good idea, anyway. Marketing companies are evil and sell based on implanting false and mutable emotional whims, the time spent considering gives those projected mutable emotions time to clear.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    AI funny enough is expensive asf for companies, if not sooner than later. that cost for maintaining a datacenter has to come from somewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I'm afraid the AI bros have a plan to integrate AI everywhere and once it becomes clear that it's not economically viable to operate their AI nonsense, they'll whine about it being a systemic risk to have them go down.
    Let's have the public bail out another sector that miscaculated financially and interweaved itself in ways with the world that letting the AI corpos go bankrupt will look like the worse of two scenarios...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 6 months ago* (11 children)

    "We're not selling enough shit - better put prices up and make our products half the size!"

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    Unironically. I've watched so many businesses fall into this trap.

    Places used to make money on volume. That was the entire point of early McDonald's. Extremely small menu served instantly. Low profit per customer, but constantly busy.

    Now one of the biggest corpo metrics is "ARPU", average revenue per user. And when they do raise prices the immediate effect is more profit, nearly every time.

    People rarely look at the price and walk out. What's more likely is that they just never come back again. Clearly management made a great change with the price increases; it must be something else driving customers away six months later. It takes time for high prices to hurt your business.

    In the 90s you could get a bucket of chicken for about $10 and feed your family of five. Inflation calculator says that should be $21 now.

    Screenshot of popeyes menu showing a family meal for $38.

    No wonder most of them are mostly empty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    I used to go out for the day, and hit someplace for lunch. Now I eat lunch at home, and then go out. It's not even that fast food is so expensive, it's not even close to good any more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    It's not a trap, it's an intentional choice, and a very profitable one. Imagine you sell a lot of a product but costs make up 90% of revenue. Then you double the price and as a result sell half as much. Your costs stayed roughly the same, maybe went up a little. So now instead of making 10% profit, you are making 40-45% profit per item. Now imagine your sales declined by less than 50% and how much extra profit that would be.

    Prior to the pandemic companies would be careful about raising prices. If they raised prices by 5% and lost 10% of sales, that was less profitable than not increasing the price. But the legit supply chain shortages during the pandemic made them realize that a larger subset of customers were willing to pay significantly higher prices than they thought, and they also realized they had less competition than they thought, and now everything costs double and we all just call it inflation, because that's what inflation is. When the price of everything goes up at the same time.

    It will continue until either there is nothing left of the upper middle class, or the upper middle class stops paying. The poor and lower middle class are already priced out, and companies do not care.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Now imagine your sales declined by less than 50%

    Corpo looks at this stat 2-4 weeks after they change prices. They don't care to realize that the sales did decline more than that, it just takes longer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago

    The obvious solution is to tighten the wages to claw back profits despite the declining sales volume!

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago

    And yet they'll never take a pay cut and will support trump and his ilk all the way to bankruptcy

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago

    “Oh no! Time to monetize their ever increasing poorness even more somehow!” -some rich prick somewhere

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Oh my god. These dumb asses forget that people need money in the first place in order to give it to them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    and then have to spend it in countries that are "tax-billionaire friendly' which is going to slowly diminishing if they all become authoritarian in nature, eventually authotarians will be the only one that is the billionaire.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago

    Seems like the headline is framing this problem in a very alien way.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

    Maybe we need a Luigi to remind corporate execs why it’s important to pay living wages…

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago*

    Why are these damn poors not spending their money, don't they know I have a family to ignore!

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago

    I remember just last week Kevin Hassett was proudly exclaiming how the economy was doing so well, citing Americans spending more on their credit cards. He even says something along the lines of 'they're spending more of it on gas, but spending is up'.

    God really needs to deus ex us right about now.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    3 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post