What's "it"? His products? I couldn't find the number in the wiki.
Edit: thank you guys! It didn't occur to be that it's actually the cash, that's crazy!
What's "it"? His products? I couldn't find the number in the wiki.
Edit: thank you guys! It didn't occur to be that it's actually the cash, that's crazy!
To be fair, thatβs 10%. Thatβs nuts.
$2.1B a year
$420M a week
I don't think that's 10%.
420M*52 weeks =21,840M =21.84B
Is it not?
How much is that after taxes?
You're technically correct. The best kind of correct.
I think this is technically more correct:
365.25 / 7 = 52.178571429
52.178571429 * 420,000,000 = 21,915,000,000
(2,100,000,000 / 21,915,000,000) * 100 = 9.582477755
Which means it's 9.58% rounded down to 2 decimals.
(This is using the common definition of a year and not a "tropical year")
He cumulated the money for more than 52 weeks
But he lost 2.1B every year, so for every 52 week period
Yes, but losing 10% of an asset typically refers to total asset value, not revenue.
Weβre not even including losses on the cocaine itself, this is all just about the revenue. He didnβt lose 10% of his business every year.
I read it that he lost a significant part if his cash assets. Revenue is a different concept. In your calculation you made the comparison with revenue.
I compared the size of the two numbers I was given. I didnβt call them equivalent, I didnβt say they described the same thing. I only even used the word revenue after you did, because I was using zero context to compare the numbers (I just like numbers and it popped out to me that it was 10%)- it wasnβt until you said revenue that it occurred to me that he probably would have reinvested much of that money and it wasnβt just profit.
That said, now that I am thinking about it, he didnβt exactly have access to non cash investment or value storage options. I wonder if there was much of a difference between the total money coming in and the total cash coming in.
Yes I know, you divided number one with number two and did the math right. Iβm just saying that in the general world of business metrics comparing those numbers is not really a common practice.
Edit. For comparison, you might have a car that loses 5k of its value in a year and you work and get paid 50k a year. Surely that 5k depreciation is 10% of your yearly income, but typically you count that per cent from the value of the car instead.
Imagine making that sort of money and just buying hippos with it
What got eaten by rats? Were those rats living on pure cocaine somehow?
Cash, delicious, delicious paper
Ah. I'm surprised there's any calories in that for a non-ruminant.
Bro, get some Tupperware or something. Sure you're still unimaginably rich, but there's a principle to it!
Nah, that shit was stolen.
That's about 21 billion a year (assuming 2 weeks for holidays because 50 is easier to multiply than 52, and 21 is a nicer number than 21.84).
all 44 comments