It’s so hilarious and absurd that the GOP beats their chest so hard about being “the party of fiscal responsibility” - but only when they’re the opposition party.
post
Quick, let's cut taxes even further! We have people to kill in the middle east!
I am certain that we can find other places to start wars as well
I'm not entirely certain that the administration will have the juice to start shit with Cuba let alone Greenland after they flubbed Iran so bad.
This Iran thing is never going to end by the way. Even when it ends it won't end, Israel will reach across the border for whatever pretexts for domestic political reasons. This is a Forever War.
But the president wants to start shit with Greenland for the express purposes of pulling us out of NATO, and that is why he is trying to increase the military budget to 1.5 trillion, to make up for all the arms sales they would lose pulling out of NATO.
It really is like that.
For the record, Iran is the near East.
Arguable, depending on your definition. But Iraq is nearer to Europe and it's been labeled "middle east" without objection for decades.
It is not arguable, Iran is the near east. That you are unfamiliar with the definitions does not make it arguable, it just makes you ignorant, and what is the word for refusing to recognize you do not know what you're talking about? That word.
It's both akshually. "Near East" and "Middle East" overlap in standard accepted meanings (in the eurocentric view of things at least). Iran is generally included in both definitions.
I think you owe somebody an apology.
I wouldnot because Iran is the near east, turkey is Asia Minor, and Mesopotamia to Egypt is the Middle East, west of there is North Africa. I did not make these definitions, but if you actually read any fucking books you would know it already.
You are profoundly ignorant of how language functions. You are not smart, you are grand standing in an argument of semantics. Ridiculous mate.
I did not make these definitions
You did though. Because those are your definitions.
Did it occur to you that different countries have different definitions? Not everyone uses the euro centric definitions. No one in my country would use the term Near East for Iran, given that it's Very Far West. Southern Asia here is more likely to mean Indonesia, but South Asia in UK means India. Fanny means bum in USA, vs cunt in UK. Are you going to argue this as well?
Funny cause the US definition for what's considered middle East is as follows (and you would know this is you just looked it up); Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, and Yemen.
If you knew how to read i didn't provide any source at all, all I said was I looked it up. These are the common countries that are referred to as the middle East. I'm sorry that your made up definition isn't what's standard in America.
Whether you found some dumbasses online to incorrectly refer to Iran as the Middle East is not in question.
The near/middle/far east terms are all eurocentric, yes, but I don't think anyone uses them as geopolitical terms in reference to other regions, especially in English.
Interesting how nasty someone can become when so overconfidently incorrect. Im wondering how that happens? How would you become so convinced you know what the middle east is when you simply dont?
Where are all those fiscal conservative deficit hawks I keep hearing about?
Except this time we dont have jack shit to export?
Untrue, you're still exporting MAGA variety conservatism and apparently there's demand for it, because there are plenty of people importing.
And bombs, I hear you've exported some to Iran.
Why do you think a war was started for no reason
95% of domestic manufacturing that remains is military shit. Can’t have China do the injection molding and machining for your top secret bombs meant to do genocide
I doubt that anything crypto-related will take on such a role anytime soon. The AI hype largely overshadows the Crypto hype.
Fed is screwed and still printing $40B/wk for “liquidity” on US treasuries because the market doesn’t want our debt.
Can’t raise interest rates to control inflation or the weak economy (when you exclude AI) gets crushed and interest on the debt explodes. Most of our debt is on short end bills so we feel the burn the moment that interest rates rise.
Can’t lower rates or inflation soars even higher.
I would ensure you have some hard assets. The money printers are whirring and devaluing dollars seems to be the most likely exit strategy in the long run.
Not financial advice. I’m a fool.
On the contrary, rates will be lowered to juice economic growth. That was certain since before the election.
Just as it is certain that these clowns will max out the credit card of the United States.
Then shit really gets bad as the administration partners with parasitical business interests to target other rich, and seize their assets, first those they feel slighted them, later Seizing Assets will become the end. If history is any guide, hail caesar! Or Cornellius Sulla as the case may be.
And more than half of that debt was created by..... Trump
No... At best entitlements are around 50% of the usa debt
it is designed by gop to assign blame to the next DEM(totally complicit as far as DInos goes) administration like they always do,.
did you notice the current shutdown has never hit the airwaves at all, the MSMs realizes the last on scared even the republican voters, so they dint report this one at all. anything to avoid the epstein files.
Why does this keep coming up like it just happened?
We hit a 100% debt/GDP ratio in 2012.
We hit 125% in 2020 during COVID.
You're welcome for the tax cuts, billionaires who will just fly to some other country when things get a little toasty.
So one more lil happy accident & USA hits the prestigious investment grade of BBB+ (it's a joke but the dollar has been sorta artificially/imperially prompted up, and the purchasing power of USA goods & services has need starched pretty thin ...).
It's called The Art of the Deal, okay!! 😤
I thought conservatives were fiscally responsible?
The worst part is:
- By definition, we can’t austerity our way out of this.
We’re in this position because of slow productivity (lack of infrastructure investment) and extreme inequality (lack of wealth tax and lack of welfare spending).
If we simply cut — even in the areas that really need it, like military — these problems will persist and even worsen, because it’s basically saying “okay, economy’s over — winners are winners forever now”.
- Austerity will be the only viable pitch to the public.
For that reason, we should probably pitch “fossil fuel austerity”.
Fiscal conservatives like to say “the government’s spending is just like yours”, even though it’s not.
So why don’t we copy their approach and say “gas is too expensive for the government, just like it’s too expensive for you — so just like you, we’re comparison shopping and looking for a better deal… like solar!”

no comments (yet)