Pumpkin, it's not just any gay nudes of yourself. It's gay nudes with very specific asks. The kinds of asks you might expect from a patron of your OnlyFans account. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

"I'm not gay, but I need to you take some gay photos for me"

I think it's like the bear hunter joke where you have to keep resubmitting it for even more clear close up photos.

That will be next wave of text scams: "You are due to be drafted, unless you send nudes of yourself getting railed up the ass, with your face showing, and either a big smile, or some other expression that demonstrates your pleasure. It must be accompanied by a 500 word essay about how much you enjoyed it. In detail."

Meh, just archaic. In ye olde times it wasn't gay to fuck, it was gay to be fucked. Ancient Greece, Ancient Rome, modern times Turkey, etc.

The Roman attitude still persists in the region, I guess?

Getting fucked is gay. Doing the fucking isn't. Duh /s

it reflects that on the online porn sites

Inquiring minds want to know.

Modern western ideas where the most important part of sexual orientation is who you find attractive is somewhat new, and while it's gained a lot of popularity among queer people worldwide it's still not the default model everywhere. In a lot of times and places things such as who you have sex with regardless of attraction or what role you take in sex are considered more important (also at what age). Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if some people were to see a man who only has receptive sex and exclusively with women as more gay than a man who exclusively tops men.

I also wouldn't be surprised if they're thinking that a straight man might be willing to top a man to get out of the military, but not to bottom

So bizarre to me. If I were forced to choose "which is gayer" id say the top is the gayest position.

As a hetero id easily be able to take a cock up the ass to avoid getting sent to kill or die. I'd struggle quite a bit more to maintain an erection strong enough to go in a man. Especially with the context motivator in the back of my head.

You hear that?! It's only gay if your recieve so you can pound as many man-ass's your dick can handle!

So I can't be gay if I'm the one sucking dick?

Big, strong, military men must always come out on top.

Nah, it says to be excluded you have to be the "passive partner" so power bottoms are still allowed.

apparently it is a whole cultural thing. it ties in to why male homosexuality is talked about in the bible and lesbians were not. without an obvious "top" it wasnt worth discussing.

iirc greeks like Spartans looked at it this way. funny how people feel the need to make distinctions, we're a strange species.

No no no no you misunderstand

Bottoms are women

Yeah this is what really stood out to me! Like wtf??

It's only gay if the penises touch.

Reminds me of "I'm straight so anyone that turns me on is a woman."

Based (of you).

Does Turkey not allow for conscientious objection? Or is it just far too difficult to meet their standards?

they dictated the speed and intensity.

hey now, this is Turkey, not the Vatican.

Turkish government has a history of oppressing Kurdish clergy tbf.

you get news (ur gay)

That's the rationalization that MAGAs use to insist that Trump's and Roger Stone's political mentor, Roy Cohn wasn't gay, he just liked to sexually dominate young blond men. That's not gay at all, it's just a power thing.

BTW, just noting that both Trump and Stone were young blond men.

how deep inside your mouth are you willing to take it?

Blackmail tax, or 'we'll prosecute you under anti-gay laws or something later' tax.

I enjoy every obligatory Airplane reference.

Your Kareem Abdul-Jabbar