all 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 137 points 7 months ago (15 children)

Isn't that... piracy? Not USAs waters, not USAs petrol...

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 92 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Hasn't stopped them from stealing oil from Venezuela and Cuba

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Sure it hasn't. But now they are ruining the pockets of the whole world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Expect it to continue because he isn't going to stop while he has power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    Our only hope is that Europe and China get tired of the crybaby and begin to do something for real, I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah. It's obvious the Americans won't do anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    those people being rounded up and sent off to camps where they're disappearing? how dare they be rounded up and disappear instead of dying at the problem for us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    Yes , but now they are the ones making everyone's petrol much more expensive, if it even gets there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 202 points 7 months ago (21 children)

    "Effective immediately, the ​United States Navy, the Finest in ​the World, will begin the process of BLOCKADING ‌any ⁠and all Ships trying to enter, or leave, the Strait of Hormuz," said Trump, who is strongly opposed to the ​idea of ​Iran charging ⁠ships a toll to pass through the strait.

    "I have also ​instructed our Navy to seek and ​interdict ⁠every vessel in International Waters that has paid a toll to Iran. No one ⁠who ​pays an illegal toll ​will have safe passage on the high seas," he ​said.

    Pretty sure what Trump is opposed to is him not getting a cut of the toll.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    This is truly an April Fools-level move.

    The US is closing the Strait? The generals couldn't open it, so Hegseth said, 'Okay! I've got it! We declare that WE'RE closing it, NOT THEM!'

    How ... is this better?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Iran was allowing some ships through. The logic is that if it’s closed to the US it must be closed to everyone (it was not before).

    Do I think this is a good move? No. Do I think Trump and Hegseth have three brain cells between them? No.

    But it also isn’t hard to understand their angle here. It’s not better for anyone. But the idea is to make it worse for Iran than the previous phase, where they had control of the strait.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Gonna be a hard sell to the rest of the world who is largely able to negotiate passage with Iran. US navy is gonna hijack ships enroute from the strait to China?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I agree. A US blockade of Hormuz was actually always a reserve strategy to put a chokehold on China if they invade Taiwan. Now we’re just playing that card for no fucking reason at all. This administration is dumb as fuck and I can’t believe there isn’t even anyone in the military who can stop them. I guess that’s what we see with Hegseth’s long line of dismissals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago

    No one ⁠who ​pays an illegal toll ​will have safe passage on the high seas

    Does that mean they are gonna attack anyone that paid? Also when he starts charging does that mean they will destroy any ships right after they pay?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    One of his many word salads involved an offer to split the tolls between us and Iran, so yeah, that’s what he wants. The dummy simply didn’t realize access to the strait was so valuable until after the bombs started dropping.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Illegal toll? Who's laws govern the strait that make these tolls illegal?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 7 months ago* (6 children)
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Lot's of people avoid using the word retard. But that's hard on some people because the loss of that word can decimate their whole vocabulary.

    I support your freedom of expression; language is hard, and some people need verbal prognostics to make their point. It's rude to pick on people just because of a diminished capacity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    By calling out the decline of Trumps cognitive abilities, I offended subset of people who should in my view never ever be called a "retard"?

    I do apologise to anyone who still wants to identify as one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    It’s just not necessary to use slurs. That’s all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    i'm torn. we shame them away from using this one, they'll just move onto the next. it's not the meaning behind the word that they like, it's the fact that it's a slur. hence the euphemism treadmill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    That still doesn’t mean that we need to use it.

    Also, we absolutely should shame these people. Let them move onto the next one. We will shame them for that too. Bigots don’t get to have things.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 82 points 7 months ago (12 children)

    Wasn't Iran already doing that before and wasn't the main goal to open it up again?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    The idea being to choke off Iran's ability to use it at all. This kills their remaining income stream and also incents the Chinese and others who thought they had a workaround (the tolls) to instead put pressure on Iran.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    But that only works if the US is willing to start attacking unarmed oil tankers, which will do no favors for their international support.

    If they hadn’t alienated all their allies, they could build an embargo until the straits were opened but that ship had sailed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 12 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    China is both extremely well supplied with Oil, and aggressively weaning itself off of oil. It's everyone else in Asia who are now pressured to get closer to China from this. Asia cutting US off from Chips, and selling to China instead, until US leaves the Gulf region, is the most effective action. Diplomatically, asserting that the US/Israel illegal war is the primary source of fuel and helium shortages needed to make chips, industry needs to focus on serving friendly country needs first.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    In Hegseth's voice... Why can't you idiots understand how clear our, sorry I mean our great President's, mission has always been. We needed to start this excursion, because Iran was about to extort the world through a blockade. It's extortion when Iran does it. We are liberating the world when we extort, uhm ... uhm... liberate them from Iranian extortion. To pre-empt some of the news you will hear later this week. Iran was already threatening the region with opening Trump branded golf courses on its soil, and so America needed to make sure our friends in the region did so before hand. Radical left wing media not understanding that we won the war because 10 more Trump golf courses are opening in Gulf and 0 in Iran, just don't understand that freedom isn't free.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    I'm still trying to work out if this one's a late April Fool...

    Imagine working for the man. You just hear crazy shit day in, day out, and have to quickly adapt and run with it, otherwise he'll find another mug who will.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    yes, trump is doing 2 things right now, try and pump and dump the markets and continued distraction from epstein files. given how bondi was replaced very quickly BY BLANCHE, and suddenly melania coming out of the woodwork to give a "i did not help diddle kids" speech.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 62 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Is it my imagination, or is that stretch of water and the water surrounding it not US territory, thus making what he wants to do (interdict) kind of ... piracy?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 43 points 7 months ago (1 child)
    [–] 39 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I think he's just pissed off that Iran is letting Chinese ships thorough. So now the question is whether Trump is stupid and deranged enough to attack any Chinese ships that ignore this illegal blockade, which would probably kick off World War 3 in earnest.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago

    If it broke out in WW3 then I think most of the world's public support would be behind China. The US has always been a hostile bully but Americans generally kept it contained to poorer countries that didn't have as much of a voice. Now though...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago*

    That's not Xi's style. I don't think he'd try unless he wants a plausible excuse to kick off a Taiwan assault.

    ...And, as far as my understanding goes, if Xi wants to do it, now would be an optimal time. Wait any longer, and Taiwan will just get more fortified.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 7 months ago

    He wants the money, that Iran wasn't charging before he invaded, for himself is as near I can figure. Master negotiator with a grand plan.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Open the fucking strait you crazy bastard!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago

    Jesus Christ. I certainly didn't have this on my rapidly flailing bingo card of the US punching itself in the face.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago

    Boy it turns out that George Lucas sure was right about the importance of blockading a trade route

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    What's next: America blowing up its own bases in the Middle East? Killing its own soldiers? Crashing its own planes?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    He cant blockade something controlled by someone else who already shut it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago

    This is a terrifyingly ridiculous timeline we find ourselves in.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago

    Open Close the STRAIT!

    -Trump!

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Surely this time people will stop talking about the Epstein files...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    That's bound to increase the price of oil.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    this goes back to are trumps decisions based on some long odd bets on the totally not maninpualted gambling markets.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    Lmfao, the guy knows a thing or two about illegal taxation extortion.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    The American military are legitimate targets.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    “Effective immediately, the ​United States Navy, the Finest in ​the World, will begin the process of BLOCKADING ‌any ⁠and all Ships trying to enter, or leave, the Strait of Hormuz,”

    Or what?

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago
    [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I guess now we find out how defensible the strait

    If Iran can close it thoroughly, they can also keep the US Navy pretty busy. How many Shahed does it take to disable a destroyer? We will find out.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    What a stupid piece of shit

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    There are a lot of people who want this level of destabilization and interruption of goods and energy security. Techno feudalists want this. Trump needs to feel powerful, so someone like Peter Theil who is trying to bring about Armageddon could easily convince Trump that this move makes him look powerful instead of a target by the rest of the world.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    These morons....

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    And the twist in the plot is that Iran unblocks the Strait of Hormuz.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Notorious pirate Captain Jackoff Turkey

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Im surprised by the comments here, this was an obvious outcome of Iran dictating that only Iranian interests could use the strait. The only real move for the US is to block all traffic (or at least all traffic heading to Iran). Why would the US allow Iran to continue to sell oil while Iran is destroying other ships.

    I'm sure the GCC have no issue with this policy, and it doesn't really change the situation for most other US aligned countries as they weren't buying Iranian oil for the most part anyways. No one wants Iran to be able to charge for access to the Strait and this would put pressure on the to find a more agreeable end to the conflict.

    Not supporting either side, just stating that this is a reasonable strategic move for the US.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Because the US cannot both declare freedom of navigation as the most important part of the straight while also blockading non-US allies which they've explicitly threatened to do. If you approach it from a realpolitik angle like you are right now, then it justifies Iran's actions in closing the straight from that very perspective. The US will not get to have it both ways. Either Iran was justified in closing the straight in response to US aggression or the US is violating international law and general principles of trade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago

    You make it sound like blockades are not common events during a war. Just cause the US is blockading the strait right now doesn't negate their desire for free passage in the future.

    Additionally, if people didn't think Iran was justified in closing the strait (due to a war) then they probably wouldn't be negotiating with them for access.

    This is what happens during war, both sides look for ways to create pressure on the other to force them to the table. Iran is fighting an uphill battle so needs to turn people against the US by limiting oil shipments, but that doesn't mean the US is just going to let them keep selling their oil.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Why would the US allow Iran to continue to sell oil while Iran is destroying other ships.

    To keep oil prices from rising too high, with whole countries running dry. While GOP will portray it as 100% democrats fault, west coast runs out of jet fuel in a week or so.

    Something Iran can do to force GCC to demand an end to war within 10 days is to destroy all desalination infrastructure

    No one wants Iran to be able to charge for access to the Strait and this would put pressure on the to find a more agreeable end to the conflict.

    It is a legal response to an illegal war. Reparations paid to Iran (normally by US) that US adoring colonies can pay instead would satisfy Iran's revenue generation/compensation rationale.

  • source
  • parent
  • 62 comments in c/nottheonion@lemmy.world view that post
    27 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    13 comments in c/world view that post
    4 comments in c/world view that post
    3 comments in c/worldnews@lemmy.ml view that post