top 74 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 161 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 68 points 7 months ago

    If it works, it's thanks to us. If it doesn't, it's your fault.

  • source
  • [–] 65 points 7 months ago

    Ah, the famous "Fox News" defense of claiming you're an entertainment medium but you should totally trust it.

  • source
  • [–] 122 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    A salesman for an AI consulting company made the comment that we don't expect perfection from humans, so why should we expect it from AI? He was smug about it, too, like it was his big gotcha. Joke's on him, I'm the one that talked the bosses out of spending money with them.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    That's such a bad argument too. The whole point of technology is to help perfect the output of humans. Why would we buy technology that is known to not do that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    "You can get pretty good results most of the time and save money on labor!" Not like our whole business model is focused on expertise and compliance or anything. Surely our clients won't mind a few little mistakes here and there, as a treat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    we don't expect perfection from humans, so why should we expect it from AI?

    If we can't expect better from an AI than from a human, why should we use the AI (other than so you don't have to pay workers)?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I think there's an important semantic difference between worse performance and correctness. Tools, like AI, can underperform when compared to humans and still be very useful and worth investing into, but that's only as long as they perform correctly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    Tools, like AI, can underperform when compared to humans and still be very useful and worth investing into, but that's only as long as they perform correctly.

    Yeah, the 'but' is the entire problem. In my experience, LLM chatbots are like if you made a 12yo a junior admin and fed them speed. Very quick to give you a confident answer, but wrong more often than not. The worst part is a lot of what I'm doing is coding, and it gets basic commands and syntax wrong

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Like there's a big shortage of unemployed humans

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    For entertainment in Excel...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 39 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 31 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Then why are they promoting it, in a pizza ad, as letting CoPilot handle the spreadsheets. Do they not trust their own product!?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    My favorite part of that ad was that it was just “magic.”

    He plugged in existing numbers and it generated some charts and there’s a line out the door!

    Did AI renegotiate supplier agreements? Did it find a way to advertise in a new way? Ha, ha! Who’s to say, just use it why don’t cha??

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago

    Are you not entertained?!

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Trillion dollar investments, dishing out private nuclear power plants, redistributing water allocation nationwide, using it in every level of every structure of society and it's just for entertainment.

    Anyone tell the politicians they bent over like hand worn muppets for a gag or do you think they already know and simply enjoy being treated for the fools that they are?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    do you think they already know and simply enjoy being treated for the fools that they are?

    You're assuming they aren't willingly participating in screwing over the constituents to line their pockets or g to give lucrative contracts to their friends

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Proposed revision: Do not use Copilot for business purposes.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago

    It's almost like it's only a data harvesting tool. Why tf should they implement it everywhere for free?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    Oh lord, I might get fired for doing this, but I smell a company-wide email about Copilot Monday morning.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    Surprise twist: I don’t and won’t rely on it for jack shit

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    (to Microsoft) So, you won't be using your ai for vibecoding your updates anymore, right? ...Right?

    ..checking Microsoft's status page..

    User impact: A subset of admins in North America may be unable to access the Microsoft 365 admin center.

    Current status: We confirmed that an issue in a recent update introduced errors in the code path that facilitates calls to the Microsoft 365 admin center when encountered by admins, which resulted in their inability to access the Microsoft 365 admin center.

    I guess Microsoft didn't get the memo they released, then...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago

    Yes, that's why it's in Office

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    Copilot: the Fox News of AI

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    Theo whole OS is garbage. Used to be at least functional, now it’s an ad infested AI slop fest.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago

    Someone finally listend to their lawyers

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    I can see where an AI that fucks everything up all the time might be entertaining like a good slapstick comedy, but nah, Resident Evil Requiem is sufficient entertainment for now.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago*

    Naw, they’re tenuously connected aside from some specific moments and characters across the franchise.

    Story wise it’s all pulp horror/scifi. If you want to play the highlights, the remakes of part 2 and 4 from the 2010’s are fantastic games and each stand on their own. 7 & 8 are a more modern style and really good straight horror experiences but not necessary to enjoy Requiem. The other entires can be rough as they were created with various elements of game design and language we’ve moved past and improved on since.

    Resident Evil Characters wiki page can be a fun read for a little more context but not an absolute need.

    Alternately if you want to get caught up without a 100 hour investment in play time, Noah Caldwell-Gervais does great long form essays on video game series’ and his resident evil one will get you up to speed for requiem in significantly less time.

    I started playing them on original PlayStation release and have enjoyed them all for different reasons. The story is a hodgepodge of 30 years of writers and artists building a world that is both overly complex and charmingly simple. Each release can be seen as a reflection of the world it was created in and the horror and espionage tropes of the time. At the end of the day though, it is a very silly series that understands the ridiculousness of its characters and world and strikes a great balance between that and being genuinely scary.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Nope, my wife and I watched a stream and I'm only vaguely aware of the plots of the other games. It didn't take away from anything, and my wife clueing me in on the references really didn't add much of value to the experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Then how come my company just roll this shit out for work? Allstate just walk us through how us co pilot to type our emails. And to use it for note taking.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Because in the end, you, the person that is forced to use various AI chatbot/agent/model/whatever, will be held responsible for anything that happens after one of the 3000 decisions they imposed you to make with no way to check everything turns out to cause the slightest problem. When that happens, YOU were supposed to know that NOTHING the AI tells/says/do is to be expected correct, so it's your responsibility if something's gone wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    So it's not called Microsoft 365 copilot anymore then? Since that is fully focused for business and not for entertainment. Make up your fking mind Microsoft

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    That's complete and utter bullshit. Either stand behind your product or don't ship it universally. Pick a lane. Either it's worth using it or isn't, so which is it?

    This wishy washy bullshit paints a picture of an embarrassingly inept organization, is that really what you're trying to project Microsoft?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago*

    then y the fuck is it prominently showing on the front page of office.com?!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Where I live, high ranking bank employees are required to use it for serious use and important advice.

    Twist the reality all you want, copilot manages my whole life.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    Meanwhile, watching the NCAA game yesterday I watched multiple commercials from Microsoft stating copilot as something to use in your daily work place and work flow. And I didn't see any disclaimer that AI was for entertaining purposes only and that they weren't liable for killing your business.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    I want to get off Mr. Bones Wild Ride.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    First entertainment purposes only is corporate language for gives the wrong answers and don't want to lose the lawsuit if we tell people to trust it. Just like Fox News.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    fuck you mean, youre pushing ai as if its usable on every corner of the OS, and NOW you announced it to be unreliable?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    they probably had Copilot write the new TOS that included this line and since nobody who uses AI reads the final output, nobody caught it.

    they never expected consumers to actually read the TOS.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    that must mean outlook is for entertainment purposes only too, since it includes copilot now...

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    So it's Microslop's Rule 34?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Hmm, this thing is on my work laptop…

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I do a few things at work that I use AI for. Work had a gpt enterprise key, now we've moved to claude. Through O365, I also have access to copilot.

    Pretty much anything I ask claude or gpt about, I can be sure to get a solid answer or one that was at least on Stack Exchange or Reddit. If that fails, and I drill down a little more on a problem, adding details, they'll both get a little better after a couple of questions and usually come up with a reasonable answer.

    Not copilot. If you ask copilot something and it doesn't come back in one shot with an authoritative cited answer, just walk away. It makes no attempt to ensure the answer is right or sane. It either hit in training or it didn't. And if it didn't, trying to convince it to strike out in a few other directions to solve it is absolutely a fool's errand.

    It's like they bought into OpenAI, then never got any updates or made any progress. I

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 7 months ago*

    It's like they bought into OpenAI, then never got any updates or made any progress

    I think they have access to the same models as OpenAI but choose to use smaller models to achieve higher margins / manage costs when people are using it all day long.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    In other words: Snake oil salesman back paddles after the ice he‘s standing on got very thin.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I think you were trying to say "backpedals."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Well, that's if they were on a bicycle, but they're standing on a paddle board over the ice. Why would they stand on a bicycle? that doesn't make sense. Neither does a paddle board on ice, but I already lost track of what the metaphor was about.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    The name MSN Copilot makes sense.

  • source
  • [+] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    incompetent man babies. can't even own up to their fuck ups a like a real man.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago
    70 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post