kiss asses kiss ass because they suck, more on that at 10
post
I'm a programmer. I'm literally paid to think. The number of times I've had to attend a corporate wide event and been asked to just not think about the shit they are spewing is unacceptable--and every time the sales guys just lap it all up.
And yet the more corporate bullshit you "fall" for, the more you seem to get paid.
Sometimes we need studies like this to point out the obvious.
Littrell noted the workers who participated in the study all came from highly educated backgrounds in HR, accounting, marketing and finance, had bachelor’s degrees and even PhDs, which shows the findings go beyond simply assessing the intelligence of the study participants.
Actually, I'm not convinced that we've managed to eliminate that hypothesis. The only group that gives me pause is accounting.
A PhD is when you know everything about one specific rock on the beach, is how I put it. You know exactly where it is, all of its properties, and can go to it any time. Outside of that one rock, maybe a slightly above-average person, but nothing special.
Generally speaking a PhD requires producing original research. Which ass-tier PhDs are you referencing that only require learning?
PhD is really mostly a proxy for how rich or educated your parents were. And rich people always score higher on general intelligence because they are better educated due to money. Less than a 1/3 of PhD students are first-generation. Meaning 2/3 of them have parents who have advanced degrees.
I was a first gen PhD student. I was the only one in my cohort of 20 students who was. Everyone else had highly educated parents. I ended up quitting because the deck was so incredibly stacked against me, and my dream job/career was basically the lazy fall-back career of folks who had generations of education and money carrying them through life.
I mean that's mostly true. Coming up with novel ideas and how to test them is a small (but critical) part of the job. Still I agree, you don't actually spend that much time on it.
No it doesn't. You are confusing the ideal of a PhD with the reality.
Most PhDs are doing bland derivative safe stuff, to get their degree and get a job. Very few are doing anything legitimately original. And most of them won't get a job in their field anyway. We have way too many PhDs because they are the cheap labor for teaching in the university systems, that have over-enrolled for decades so they have to hire less faculty.
Most of my cohort in grad school did not belong there, at a mid-level state school. Only about 1/4 of us were serious about our studies. Yeah, at elite schools you will be doing original research for sure, at most low/mid level programs (and there are a lot) most PhDs are just people with good grades killing time tying to figure out what they want out of life, and a PhD is a good way to do that for 5-10 years. The time to graduate has been going up to over 6 years on average now.
Mmm you know that's a good point, I never even considered looking at mid or low tier programs when I was school shopping. Your point reminds me of Mike Israetel's embarrassing doctorate that he likes to use as a kudgle. I could have done his dissertation without the typos and I am educated in a completely different field.
“Study finds graduates of programs that require colouring inside the lines do well at colouring inside the lines at work.”
All of those sound structured backgrounds that apply fixed definitions and derivatives based on that. They lack a developed sense of creativity outside the rigidity of their domain and so, are pretty much biological LLMs after a decade of purposed training and instructions.
Not a single hard science occupation in engineering or technical aspects? Yeah that's a shit biased study.
Education ≠ intelligence. To quote Berkeley, "Few men think; yet all will have opinions."
Hmmm..let's take this idea and run it up the flagpole, see if anyone salutes it.

fuck. i instinctively downvote scott adams even though he's dead
He understood exactly how many bullshit jobs exist in corporate culture.
He did do really well at depicting the incoherent blathering of management as it was, but Graeber he wasn't. He was just a cartoonist who thought himself an engineer.
"Corporate Bullshit" = "Mission Statement"
Oh man, I was part of a small non profit for years. I loved it.
I quit once they decided they needed a mission statement, because the enshittification had begun. And now instead of doing work and standing on their own, they are on social media grandstanding for clout and begging for money... because it was no longer about doing good work and helping people, it was about getting a fatter paycheck. And you get that by leaning into the corporate bullshit marketing crap.
I’m a programmer. I’m literally paid to think. The number of times I’ve had to attend a corporate wide event and been asked to just not think about the shit they are spewing is unacceptable–and every time the sales guys just lap it all up.
You're not relaying accurately: the underachievers and floating job cancers pretend to fall for corporate bullshit because being cheerleaders covers up their ineptitude.
Corporate-speak is just how people gloss over the details while making others think they know what they're talking about. It's just the evolution of the basic investor sales tactic to sell something that doesn't actually exist yet to get someone to pay for the development of that product. Only in this case they're using the tactic on each other to get people to pay them money while providing no actual value while their subordinates are forced to waste time adapting their work to those nonsense words.
Of course they are. They can't actually compete so they drink the kool-aid to justify keeping them around.
wow. I must have been a great at my job. I mean that does not logically follow but, you know, feels good to think that way.
Correlation
1 comment