[–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

Terrible performance not, but I've had baaad texture bugs, missing trees, missing landscape and such. I did try to install the latest driver to fix it (which apparently wasn't part of AMD's software update launcher thing and instead had to be manually downloaded and installed like it's 2005), but still had no luck. So for now, no remastered pirouetting with singing lady's in the background.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    The most important things have already been said. May I ask how long you two have been a couple before marriage? My wife and I have been together for nine years before marrying last year. And the only difference in our relationship has been that we now need to remember to say our combined last name instead of the ones we had before the wedding. That is to ask, do you think the issues are marriage-specific or could it be that these are things that would have surfaced in due time anyway?

    Or is there maybe an external stressor that just results in (hopefully unwanted) lashing out at each other? My wife just chimed in how her job is currently very stressful and that's why she also has a short temper at home sometimes.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Okay, so I watched the Ukraine video and judging only by that, it would seem that NATO and the US are mostly to blame for the war against Ukraine. I do think that the US took big steps in making a lot of places in the world worse (I'll leave open if intended or accidentally) by installing puppet politicians/leaders and at some point (or from the get-go) just focusing on extracting as much wealth as possible. The one thing that did strike me as super-odd and suspicious was when he said that Putin did try to join NATO and was rejected and the implication of how he's now butthurt that Ukraine gets a "better chance" at joining NATO. That one I looked up and from my now-understanding it's that Putin/Russia basically wanted to be invited into joining NATO without needing to go through the formal process of applying for a membership, having lengthy (and important) documented talks about expected policies and ways the country would deal with certain topics, such as diversity/non-heterosexuality. And if that is true, then this is a biiig ommitted point in the Boyboy Ukraine-video.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I'm commenting because I'm also interested in this. I do (fortunately or unfortunately, depending on your perspective) agree with a lot the two say, find them pretty likeable and to me it did seem like they were interested in presenting a mostly neutral/open view on any issues. But I also acknowledge that they're allowed to have complex opinions and that those might sometimes clash with mine. And they're also not infallible and never claimed to be, so it could also be a lack of research on a particular topic.

    I think in the worst case, it'll be similar to how I view Hassan Piker (spelling?) / the Chinese government: Even if I disagree on very important issues, I might still have some ideas in common. People are complex and stuff.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Really? I thought it was mostly solved by regulations that require filters at the industrial sites (and aren't those used in Diesel cars, too?). Actually, what happens with the gunked-up filter material? Can the captured sulfur and nitrogen be used? I think you can use nitrogen as a fertilizer?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Acidic rain.

    I don't remember any of the specifics anymore but it boils down to: Trees and plants died in masses, scientists and the general population got together and we changed what caused it.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    I just access it via the Firefox browser. Mostly because I'm tired of everything wanting to have its own app which turns out to just be a more colourful container to load the webpage (my tinfoil hat hypothesis is that they do it to bypass adblocks). And the other reason is that I couldn't find anything I need to do on Lemmy that I'm not just as able to do from the browser.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago*

    At the risk of sounding conspiratorial: Are we sure this is not something the government planned? Why so secretive about this sudden private sector position and why would Trump care? Hopefully I'm wrong but I think this is the first time that Trump called someone, who apparently garnered his ire and anger, a friend or anything positive. Usually when it's people that he doesn't like (anymore) he calls them all kinds of derogatory things.

  • source
  •  

    I was originally made aware of this article by a 404 Media newsletter. It's pretty interesting, largely confirms what has already been known so far, but also gives some fresh knowledge, like how nutrients from insects might not be quite as available, even if they technically have a very similar macronutrient profile to meats. That's because the present chitin reduces the bioavailability to a certain degree.

    CONCLUSION Edible insects represent a promising complementary protein source capable of contributing to the growing global demand for sustainable and nutritionally adequate foods. They provide high-quality protein and relevant amounts of macronutrients and micronutrients, often comparable to or exceeding those of conventional animal-derived foods, while offering clear environ- mental advantages. Nevertheless, their integration into human diets requires a cautious and evidence-based approach. Current limitations include substantial variability related to insect species, developmental stage, rearing substrate and processing methods, as well as methodological heterogeneity in the assessment of pro- tein content, digestibility and bioavailability. Inconsistencies in analytical approaches, particularly regarding digestibility proto- cols and the handling of chitin-derived nitrogen, hamper compa- rability across studies and may bias protein-quality indices such as PDCAAS and DIAAS. Moreover, most evidence supporting biological activities (e.g., antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and cyto- toxic effects) is derived from in vitro and animal models, while human data remain limited to small, short-term studies and are insufficient to substantiate health or clinical claims. Food safety concerns, including allergenic cross-reactivity, microbial contami- nation and chemical residues, together with regulatory heteroge- neity and persistent barriers to consumer acceptance, further constrain large-scale application. To support responsible uptake, regulatory authorities and industry stakeholders should prioritize the harmonization of guidelines for rearing substrates, hygienic production, analytical methods and labeling, including clear allergen disclosure. The implementation of robust quality- management systems (good manufacturing practices (GMPs)/ HACCPs), validated processing protocols and transparent com- munication regarding origin, processing and safety is essential to build consumer trust and enable the sustainable incorporation of insect-based ingredients into food systems.

    view more: next ›