MJ calls what happened to her in Zion national park “small ‘T’ trauma”. She knows women have experienced worse from their partners. But she still feels the anger of being left behind on a hike by her now ex. “It brings up stuff in my body that maybe I have not cleared out yet,” she said.

Five years ago, MJ and a new partner – he was not exactly her boyfriend, and the pair were not exclusive – traveled from Los Angeles to Utah for an adventure getaway. MJ, who is 38 and works in PR, was looking forward to exploring Zion’s striking scenery; its vast sandstone canyon and pristine wading trails were on the list. But on the morning of their big hike, MJ was not feeling well. She could not shake the feeling that something was “off”; indeed, MJ would learn on this trip that her partner was seeing other women.

As they made their way up Angel’s Landing, MJ’s partner started walking faster than her. “I could tell it was getting on his nerves that I was slow,” she said. “I was like, ‘Fuck it, just go ahead of me.’” He did without hesitation.

When she caught up at the top of the mountain, they took a picture together. Then her partner hiked down the mountain with a woman he had met on the way up, leaving MJ to finish by herself. They broke up shortly after that trip. (MJ asked to be referred to by her initials for the sake of speaking openly about a past relationship.)

Last month, MJ opened TikTok and heard the phrase “alpine divorce”, a label she now attaches to her experience in Zion.

top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 50 points 7 months ago (3 children)

People are so weird. I once worked closely with a single woman, and the boss had a big Christmas party for the managers, and she brought a guy that she'd been dating for a couple months, and was getting close to.

For some reason that none of us ever learned, he decided to completely ignore her that night. He knew nobody at that party but her, and yet he pretended like he'd never seen her before. It wasn't a big party,maybe 20 people, so we ALL saw what was going on. Eventually, he took her home, but they never went out again.

I asked her about what happened, and he wouldn't discuss it. He dropped her off at home, and they never spoke about it on the ride home or after. The guy just decided to turn into a different person that night.

BTW, she was a really cool person, pretty, fashionable, great hair, super smart, funny, great job, owned her own house, etc. The loss was entirely his.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 86 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    A recent case study illustrates this point: last month, an amateur Austrian mountaineer was found guilty of gross negligence manslaughter for leaving his exhausted girlfriend behind on his country’s highest peak while he went in search of help. The man, a Salzburg chef identified only as Thomas P, said he was “endlessly sorry” for her death, and his lawyer called it a “tragic accident”. But Thomas P could not explain why he failed to wrap his freezing girlfriend in her emergency blanket before heading down the mountain without her. Earlier in their trek he had also told a police officer over the phone that they did not need any help, even though a rescue helicopter was made available to them.

    I remember hearing about this one.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 7 months ago* (8 children)

    He had done it before with another woman, but she didn’t die. In the recent case, the dead woman’s family supported him. Even though he took their survival supplies. Very odd situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

    Her mom's issue is the media and courts treated her daughter like a lost sheep led up a mountain.

    She was an experienced climber and they planned their trips together.

    He didn't take the emergency supplies, he just didn't swaddle her like a baby in her own.

    The helicopter call stuff was kind of shady tho, and rightfully why he was found guilty.

    But it's not like the mom said he was innocent, she said it was likely an accident, because procedure in climbs like that is to leave someone behind, and she knew that because her daughter had been doing this long before the boyfriend.

    But her comments got misrepresented for the headlines.

    It all makes logical sense, it's just the people telling us about it care more about drama and clicks than informing people.

    If you understand it, it becomes an incredibly boring story that doesn't stand out. Which is why TikTok went the complete opposite direction, and mainstream media is reporting on their nonsense for the clicks.

    Quick edit:

    Specifically for the emergency blanket part, the last stages of hypothermia makes you feel insanely hot.

    The early stages cut off circulation to limbs to keep the torso warm, that's why frostbite effects the extremities, it's a trade off. When you're going to die from it, you're body can't squeeze you're arties off and all that "warm" blood floods to your limbs, causing them to quickly rise in temp while the vital parts get cold.

    So she likely was bundled up just fine when he left her.

    That's all normal stuff climbers know, but the media/courts seemed to be willfully ignorant of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    All the articles I've read say he never applied the emergency blanket, it was still packed away. Nor did he make her safe by building any kind of shelter or securing her against wind.

    And then he also did not call for help until three hours after they decided they needed help, and rejected the helicopter rescue. None of those are normal things. Those are the actions of someone abandoning someone to die.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (4 children)

    None of those are normal things.

    1. Which is why he was found guilty of manslaughter

    2. And those bad decisions may likely be due to stress/incompetence. Something that happens, but again that's what makes it manslaughter.

    Those are the actions of someone abandoning someone to die.

    If you're ignorant of the realities of alpine mountaineering I could understand why you believe that.

    The dead woman's mom wasn't ignorant of it tho, that's why she keeps saying it wasn't murder.

    How experienced are you with cold weather mountain climbing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] -5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Well, then you don't have an excuse

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 130 points 7 months ago (26 children)

    the pair were not exclusive

    …

    MJ would learn on this trip that her partner was seeing other women

    …isn’t that was “not exclusive” means?

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [+] 46 points 7 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Sure. My point is, though, isn’t that already implied by them not being exclusive?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 33 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    Soooo, this guy was a dick, but aren't you just defining "exclusive until we say we are not"?

    Maybe I'm getting old and have lost the lingo (very possible) but I feel like we're redefining exclusive here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    I still think we are saying the same thing.

    "Let's not put labels on anything, let's just choose to not have any other partners while we are sleeping together. If one us changes our mind about that, they should be up front with the other person about it."

    "Let's be exclusive. If one us changes our mind about that, they should be up front with the other person about it."

    Am I missing something? Is "exclusive" used for a different definition now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [+] -6 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I'm shocked by this comment section... Guys defending some POS for leaving their non-committed partner on their own?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    I mean, she said go on without me. 

    It's an out and back. They waited for them up at the top.

    To me the only shitty part is dumping them for another partner on the way down, goddamn that's pretty shitty. We're only hearing half the story though. Maybe she was being a jerk too and he didn't want to put up with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    You don't expect your BF to hook up with someone new mid-mountain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    Actually it says he wasn't exactly her boyfriend either

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    Ok so it’s ok to abandon your fuck buddy. TIL

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

    I was talking about the hooking up mid mountain part, which is what your comment I replied to was primarily about. And the OPs too.

    You can just admit you missed that part instead of getting defensive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I missed nothing. That is not important to the story. When you go into the wilderness with someone, you have formed an inherent defense pact and have a duty of care to each other. Hooking up mid mountain and leaving the other person, regardless of their relationship, is immoral. If harm comes to them, then it was likely illegal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    Your comment wasn't talking about the "abandoning mid mountain" part. It was talking about the relationship status part. That's the part I corrected. We weren't, in this comment chain, talking about the overall story - it was about your comment on their relationship. Stop trying to build a strawman.

    Geez, Americans really can't admit they made even a minor mistake.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago*

    Uhhhh

    "seeing other women" means "not exclusive"

    but "not exclusive" does not always mean "seeing other women"

    He could be, just as one example of many, very unsuccessful at trying to see other women despite having an existing "nonexclusivity" agreement with her.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    yes, but people are emotional and they don't abide by their own terms

    every casual relationship i ever had was never actually casual. it was just full on monogamy with a 'get out of jail if someone better comes along' card built in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    Just a few weeks ago I saw a dude have an argument with his partner on top of Cradle Mountain and then head down before her. We kept an eye on her to make sure she made it down OK (sketchy down climbing). He was at the bottom of the steep bit on his phone when we got there.. She caught up and they seemed fine, but it was a weird vibe.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I went with my ex to a local waterfall once. It was pretty dry, so I wanted to explore the top of the falls a bit since it's normally not accessible. It's very flat up there, and I kept back from the edge since I don't like heights anyway, but she got mad at me for being up there since she didn't feel comfortable coming out with me.

    So a couple minutes later, I'm done poking about, and I turn around and she's nowhere to be seen. Now I'm worried she went over the side and something happened to her. I started looking over the edge of the hill leading up to the falls and trying to see if she's down there, but there was enough water to still be spraying the rocks. My foot slides out on a wet patch, and now I'm falling down the rock face!

    I crashed off at least 3 ledges on my way down, and was flipping over and trying to grab onto things to catch myself, but there was nothing but rock and moss, but I finally come to a stop. I have no clue how I didn't die or break anything. It was one of the scariest moments of my life. After I checked on my own life, I saw she wasn't there, so I made my way to the car. She was there just being annoyed.

    She seemed to think I deserved it for not listening to her for saying it was dangerous, while it was not the activity I was doing that led to me falling, but that I thought I needed to be looking for her after she disappeared without saying she was going to the car. I don't think she must have realized it was not just one rock I fell off of, but probably at least 10+ feet of rock, but needless to say I wasn't very appreciative of her lack of concern. I was just grateful to be alive at that point. I was sore for a few days and had some bruises that lasted a couple months. Was I a jerk? I don't feel so, but I don't believe remote places in the outdoors are the place to put arguments ahead of everyone's safety either way. If I would have gotten hurt badly, who knows how long she would have sat there before looking for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Damn, you're both lucky things didn't go worse. "I told them it was too dangerous, then I left them alone anyway, and they died from their injuries" would be a hell of a thing to have on one's conscience, let alone one thing to admit on the defendant's stand.

    I mean, you're (presumably) an adult who can take responsibility for your own actions, but if she was truly concerned for your safety, abandoning you makes no sense. No matter how skilled my partner might be, I'd be waiting at the edge watching like a hawk, not saying anything, just making sure their stunt didn't end the way I feared it would. There's plenty of time for arguments about it when we're both back on solid ground. Literally turning away and walking off at the height of a dangerous act while alone in nature doesn't say "I'm concerned about your safety" as much as it says "I'm emotionally-immature and can't prioritize your actual well-being above my personal feelings."

    Glad to hear she's an ex.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago*

    You are very correct. We both could have regretted the events much more than we did.

    When I see parents take their smaller children places, I count them as "not dangerous."

    This is where I was.

    People will photograph each other chilling there all the time. I don't want to get close enough to see over the edge since I don't like heights, I just wanted to walk on the creekbed.

    This is still at the top of the falls, but more indicitive of the side of the falls where she "disappeared" on me and what I was looking for her in. What I bounced off on the way down was three or so of those big boulders to the right of the tree there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    IMO, that incident was ¾ your fault.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    I'm sure I deserve partial credit. I was in a bad place mentally back then so I did a lot of stupid and inconsiderate things I regret. But I'm also now with someone who wouldn't walk away from me even when I am being an idiot because they care about my safety, so I learned a lot of lessons since then.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    I mean what else are you gonna do? Have an escalating fight while you are in an emotionally unstable state? Walking away to calm down is just the right thing to do often, that doesnt change just because you are on a hike.

    The cases in the article sound like there is more to them though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    Walk back silently while in sight of each other, or if you really need time and space, take it while neither of you continues to hike. Or just fucking get a hold of your emotions to finish the damn hike.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    You can have a fight and still look out for each other's wellbeing. If this was a walk on very safe flat terrain, maybe you'd have a point, but this was kilometres of intense scrambling and climbing over steep boulder fields with serious risk of injury. I'm a OK rock climber, and there were parts that freaked me out.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 146 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    I'm just gonna say it, if you want to break up with your girlfriend don't be a dick about it.

    "Don't go on a hike with someone you don't trust." All you little boys in here victim blaming need to be checked.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago

    Some people, not anyways men, have been taught, rather mercilessly, that they have to be self sufficient. These people get aggravated, even angry when someone else fails to live up to the standard that they (unfairly) were forced to. There can be an instinctive feeling that it is somehow an injustice to them.

    That doesn't excuse abandoning someone in the wilderness. Often these people struggle to learn to be a kind helper.

    Also, none of this is meant to excuse the behavior. It is possible to understand "why" without condoning it. When confronting this it is important to be firm that it is unacceptable, as well as understanding that it may be a struggle to relearn.

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    Damn what a cowardly way to dump someone. Is it really that much of a pain in the ass to stick it out for a couple of days until you're not literally abandonning someone somewhere they didn't expect to be alone? Bunch of douchy and selfabsorbed asshats.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    For context, angel's landing is one of probably the top 5 most famous hikes in the country. It's so popular that they have timed entry, and you have to book a time well in advance. It would be very, very, very hard to get lost, you can see the spot you started from pretty much the whole way, you are part of a steady stream of people, and there's cell service. There is no "alone" on that hike.

    People have died on that hike, but if you exclude suicide and people who were intentionally going off trail to get pictures closer to cliff edges, it's very unlikely. You are probably safer getting dumped there than at a restaurant in a part of town you aren't familiar with.

    I would not put that anywhere near the same category as guy who left his girlfriend on a mountaineering expedition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 7 months ago

    My comment was mainly aimed at the general thought of just abandonning someone on any hike, not necessarily this particular one, but the whole "alpine divorce" thing in itself.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    People can have problems on a hike that aren't deadly but still require support. If a partner is slow it might be because they're getting sick or injured. Even if the chance of them dying is low, it's still your responsibility as their partner to look after them. No one else on that trail is going to have a higher responsibility to support them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    It seems like the man and the women in this story both had different expectations for what kind of partnership they had.

    If I was hiking with a buddy where we were on equal footing and both self-sufficient, and we were pissing each other off, then I wouldn't feel like I had any special responsibility to them over any of the normal shared responsibilities that all hikers have to each other. We would owe each other common courtesy, but wouldn't need to babysit each other on the trail.

    If I felt like I was responsible for the other person, because they weren't self-sufficient, then of course I wouldn't leave them behind.

    If I felt like I was in a relationship with the other person, and we were pissed off with each other, then maybe I would hike ahead for a few minutes to give each other some time to cool off. But I wouldn't leave them to hike the hike on their own, if I knew they wanted to hike it together. I would care about my partner in a different way and want to prioritize the relationship vs. a buddy I was friends with. 

    Although I guess it would depend on the friendship I had too. There are some friends who I would feel comfortable hiking separately to the summit if we pissed each other off. And there's other friends who I think I would not do that with.

    I could even imagine being partners with someone who would prefer to hike separately to reach the summit and then try to make up there.

    I'm sure that things vary from place to place, but wherever I've been in nature, strangers are very quick to check on you and help you out if you seem to be struggling. Whether it's hiking, mountain biking, skiing, or anything else, we all know that it could be us someday.

    I think this comment section is so contentious because there is a whole range of behaviors and experiences that this story brings up in people. And we're all trying to speak in generalities about situations that are very nuanced when they happen in the real world.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Is the timed entry a new thing? I remember just walking in to the park. Maybe I was in the off season because it had just snowed the week before and there were still a few campsites closed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I think it's relatively new. It might also be seasonal. Last time I was there, they let you hike all the way up to the scout lookout before you need the permit. Basically as soon as you get to the bottleneck of the chain section.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Well, damn. That particular location would suck to be turned around at, because you're so close...

    But I can also see how having too many people at the last outcropping would lessen the experience for everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Don't expect good things from shitty people.

    Women need to learn how to identify womanizers if they don't want to be womanized. Most of them don't care though so it keeps happening.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    I hear what you're saying about staying away from shitty people, but anyone can lie about who they are short term, and when women are wary of all men in order to stay safe, we get hit with "not all men." It's a real lose-lose.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    i left this bitch ass on a mountain one time he was being toxic as hell. ruined my damn trip. left him up there with a group of girls we had just met. fuck it

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    Balanced take. This kind of thing is very veryserious. But also a dilution of the term Alpine Divorce, which people have died from.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 7 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (7 children)

    But it is also not true that they were at risk? Any more than you could die anywhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 7 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (5 children)

    I disagree that a popular trail with many people can be called wilderness, but I would be okay calling it a backcountry location.

    There are not too many things that can harm you on such a trail compared to another comparable physical activity, like playing soccer on a field for instance. The main difference is that it is harder to get to definitive care if you do get hurt.

    On the soccer field, the ambulance pulls up in 5-10 minutes when you sprain an ankle or get stung by a bee and your airway closes up. On the hike, ideally you splint yourself and walk out if you roll your ankle, And do anything you can if you get that bee sting and have a life-threatening anaphylaxis, including call 911, lie down flat on your back, take bandadryls if you have them, and use your epipan if you have it.

    But in both these cases you're never really alone because there are so many other people. And on the trail, there's probably a higher chance of encountering somebody with first aid training than on the soccer field.

    To be honest, I'm not sure what exactly the context of your question was, but I assume it has something to do with leaving somebody to hike alone on these popular trails like angel falls or delicate arch in general.

    In the specific example of the article, I don't think it was a super big deal that the original person left her to go home with another woman, because she didn't seem too much in danger, just emotionally hurt. She even told him to go on and hike ahead of her. In the worst case, there are plenty other people who would help her if she were to roll an ankle, have car trouble, or something. And she had cell service the whole time. To me, this isn't that different than getting up and leaving somebody in the middle of a jog in a nice neighborhood that you arrived at separately, if you had a fight with them. The biggest difference being the response time of EMS.

    From reading these other comments, though, a lot of people seem to feel like being left alone on a hike would be more stressful than being left alone in the front country, which I don't really understand, but I can accept that people would feel like that. I would hate to be abandoned at a party or at a bar, for instance -- It's not somewhere I'm comfortable at all. And I'd much rather walk back to my car alone on a popular well marked trail in the daytime.

    The example of the woman at Delicate Arch is more confusing since it seems she actually was having a medical issue of some kind giving her vertigo. I don't think the two should have separated in that case, but it's really hard to decipher what actually happened in that situation, Especially having just one side of the story.

    The example that involved the woman dying in the mountains is wildly different to me. I really don't like how much male ego the guy seems to have in that he had abandoned previous partner on a different trip and how he had declined a helicopter rescue for both of them when they were first in trouble. In my opinion, he killed the person he was with by doing that.

    There seems to be no world to me in which the situation on the angel falls trail is at all comparable to the gross negligence in that last example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    I think we will have to agree to disagree on some points due to different backgrounds. On extremely crowded trails near me, danger from wildlife is just not common where I'm from. If I was in California, maybe I would have to worry about mountain lions, but even they do not like crowds, so I'm not sure what wild animals you are considering a risk. I think probably the most risky animal would be something you could get a bee sting and anaphylaxis from, which would be more dangerous in the back country, I agree. But it doesn't seem significantly different if you are hiking alone and the person right behind you calls 911 in 20 seconds when they reach you, or if the person right next to you calls 911.

    Some trails have fall potential and some don't. It would be a very different thing to leave somebody to attempt half dome on their own versus a nice hike in the woods, even when going up to a pleasant summit.

    I've heard kayakers say never boat alone, but where I live at least the same thing is not true for hiking, mountain biking or even rock climbing for that matter. Maybe that's a rule of thumb in your area that just doesn't exist here. I would definitely never ever swim alone, though. The common training here for hikers is to carry the ten outdoor essentials even on easy hikes, and practice leave no trace, including step 1: Always let somebody know where you're going and when you'll come back.

    To me the biggest issue here is communication. If I was expecting to meet my hiking partner back at the car, but when I got there they had driven off already, I would be really miffed, not knowing what happened. It would be even worse if their car was there, but they were not there.

    On the other hand, if they told me, hey, I've got to leave early, I'm going to head back to the trailhead now, and I said, okay, fine, I'll see you next time and finish the hike on my own. I don't see any problem doing that. To me, there's no set in-stone rule against hiking alone, the way there is for swimming alone or boating alone, because it is just not as risky, and, in fact, is quite routine. That's why it's hard for me to call most back country areas near me 'wilderness', because they are so close to civilization, so dominated by human impacts that there is just so little added risk that you wouldn't have in the front country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 7 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Yes that would piss me off too!! We are in 100% agreement there.

    We also have a few venomous snakes that can injure people -- I didn't think of that at first! Typically never on the crowded trails but if you go on any branches they're there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    MJ and a new partner – he was not exactly her boyfriend, and the pair were not exclusive...[MJ] could not shake the feeling that something was “off”; indeed, MJ would learn on this trip that her partner was seeing other women.

    This is like saying you agreed to go dutch on a date, and then feeling that something was "off" because you couldn't shake the feeling he was intending to split the bill.

    No shit?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 7 months ago (17 children)

    Co-opting alpine divorce, which regularly involves a murder attempt, feels weird? Just call it the sierra split.

    I do wonder how much of this is a cheapening of the weekend getaway, where you'd go to a B&B upstate, find out your potential partner snores, drinks to much, is rude to service workers, or views a toothbrush as optional. You'd sigh and split. It's just a bad weekend.

    But with this, camping and hiking is a complication. You're drinking warm filtered water from a Nalgene, eating granola because someone forgot to bring a lighter. Also, it's raining and all your socks are wet. Did you bring anything to wash dishes? Ah, there are no dishes. You smell like smoke and are covered in sand.

    Granted, you can do camping/hiking well, but I'd bet some of these cases are from people doing it poorly, trying to save a buck by avoiding more expensive weekend getaways.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] [S] -5 points 7 months ago (13 children)

    but I'd bet

    So no proof then. Guesses don't count.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (12 children)

    Ok your honor I'm sure they'll follow the rules of the courtroom next time

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 7 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (10 children)

    Why would my response have anything to do with the gender of the person I'm replying to? How do you expect me to even know that information? How do you know I'm not a woman? (I'm not, just pointing out that immediately making this a men vs women thing is bad.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 7 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (8 children)

    Lemmy is absolutely male dominated, I just don't like perpetuating the gender war discourse. There are some reasonable takes in here and I would prefer not to have it be drowned out by the "women weak" and "men evil" takes I've seen being tossed around.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 7 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (6 children)

    I've done both. I just have longer comment chains arguing with the women because misogynistic comments have the depth of a puddle and there's not much more to say to them than "you suck and I hate your entire worldview".

    I also again disagree with the framing that allegiance here should be gender-based.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah I agree that's very prevalent in the thread

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    The intent of those comments varies wildly from "women should man up" to "why are we assuming women aren't the more capable hikers" to "why are men even abandoning someone they supposedly want to hike with" etc. I think some have gotten more upvotes than they deserve but not all of them are just saying we shouldn't be concerned about women being abandoned in the wild by their partners, and those that do say that usually have appropriate replies. What you described is certainly an issue but I don't think it shows an overwhelmingly mysogynistic sentiment from the lemmy userbase at large.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    You are unfortunately correct that this is a much more common view here than it should be. I hope that the arguments against it will prove useful in changing peoples' minds; lemmy is not 4chan and I believe we are in general more capable of self-improvement. At least I hope so.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    And some men wonder why some women would choose a bear.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago

    I would never leave my girlfriend stranded on a hike. I need her for if there is a bear.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    10 comments in c/news@lemmy.sdf.org view that post
    10 comments in c/world view that post
    7 comments in c/womensstuff@piefed.blahaj.zone view that post
    2 comments in c/LongformIndepth@lemmy.world view that post