https://fortune.com/2026/03/04/palantir-tech-companies-offices-vending-machines-tobacco-worker-productivity/

Free drugs for being a good cog? Man now we are talking business perks.

Screenshot of news article reading "Palantir and other tech companies are stocking offices with tobacco products to increase worker productivity"

all 86 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 169 points 8 months ago (11 children)

Now that's some cyberpunk dystopian shit. Corpos drugging up employees for productivity.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 84 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    in the 1960s American cigarette companies used to leave free packs of cigarettes in freshman dorms at the beginning of the school year because at least some of them would get bored and try it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I mean that's not new - tech companies will still advertise "coffee on tap" as a perk to work for them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    the whole idea of a coffee 'break' was created to pump stimulants into workers to improve productivity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I think it is the unintended side effect of taking a short break which actually increases productivity.

    There are studys that show that constant coffein consumption just make being caffeinated the new normal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I'm still going outside for a smoke when I get my 15. They are only providing pouches (snuff) so people don't have to leave their workstation to get their fix.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 22 points 8 months ago

    Yeah. I can't wait for my complimentary IV and catheter at my cubicle and 0 breaks.

    I used to take smoking breaks without smoking cause it wasnt fair to dish them out to only smokers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 8 months ago

    Only because they don’t yet have approval to hand out amphetamines

  • source
  • [–] 55 points 8 months ago* (6 children)
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Is there more footage of Hitler tweaking? Show modern nazis what their shitty "master race" looks like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Hmmm, how much you want to bet the tobacco companies slipped a little money under their door mat

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 5 points 8 months ago

    I don't want to lose money having to take the opposite of you. The likelihood they are actually just buying this at market price and don't have a contract is so low it might as well be rigged.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 3 points 8 months ago

    Yeah, I mean there were the amphetamines and opiates that they thought made people better workers too but that was just during periods where people hated reality and they realized the disassociation was worse for efficiency so now just back to nicotine.

    Why can't we make our own study that says that the dopamine of watching a live hibachi chef makes us a better slave and at least get a flaming volcano of onion out of this?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago

    Always with the "extract every ounce of yourself for us", never with the "take care of yourself to maximize your potential for us".

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    The original nazis used meth, but these fash aren't quite there yet.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    It works...at first.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I'm holding out for free cocaine

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago*

    Coffee is my drug of choice and my work provides it for me. Thank you, work.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    Why don't they just use their job replacing AIs?

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago

    What do you think free coffee is for?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    Until they have newbies trying that stuff and ending up puking and/or having headaches

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    just realized decaf is not an option in my office 🤔

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Is coffee not good enough anymore?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    for anyone just interested in reading a recent study on the effects of nicotine.

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11350241/

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I found this review paper interesting and I don't doubt that nicotine can have therapeutic effects but the funding source worried me.

    Conflict of interest

    Authors YC, XW, XZ, HT, YZ, JZ, and SZ were employed China Tobacco Anhui Industrial Co., Ltd.

    The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

    The authors declare that this study received funding from Technology Project of Anhui Zhongyan Industry Co., Ltd. The funder had the involvement in the study design, data analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript.

    Funding Statement The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was financially supported by the Technology Project of Anhui Zhongyan Industry Co., Ltd. (2022156), Science and Technology Projects of State Tobacco Monopoly Administration (110202201046XX-05), Startup Program of XMU and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 4 points 8 months ago

    I read through it and just thought they were being generous with the fact that they were stating the positives as mostly people with depression and ADHD self medicating with an addictive substance that didnt really help as much as cause a feedback loop that felt better but more addictive...

    The fact that they state the funders directly had involvement in the study... Oof.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Why not just skip straight to the point and save us all a decade or so. Meth on tap.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    Man, just modafinil or adderall lol.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    It's appalling that they're doing it but they aren't tobacco products, they nicotine products.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    A lot of the nicotine in products like these is made from tobacco. Some of it is synthetic nicotine, some is plant-derived.

    I couldn’t find statistics but at least some companies have different product names for synthetic vs natural.

    e.g. “VELO” is plant-derived while “VELO Plus” is synthetic.

    https://nicokick.com/us/pouch-perfect/products/velo-vs-velo-plus

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    In my opinion this is splitting hairs. Chewing tobacco, cigarettes, cigars, etc., are tobacco products having tobacco as a main ingredient. Nicotine gum, pouches, patches, and ecigs are nicotine products as they have nicotine (synthetic or derived) but no actual tobacco. If the got the nicotine from eggplants you wouldn’t call it an eggplant product.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Almost all of it is tobacco-derived, which is why I always found the "tobacco companies are trying to get vapes banned" idea ridiculous. They're the ones making the stuff that goes in the vapes.

    I think the point of the distinction is regarding cancer. Tobacco on the gums causes mouth cancer, nicotine maybe maybe not.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (4 children)

    Nicotine by itself isn't any worse than caffeine. I hate that puritanical American bulldozers right and left, call nicotine pouches and vapes tobacco products. Shut the fuck up nerds. Pop a zynn and watch some TV.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I am of your same opinion about nicotine, but I will say that the pouches are making my gum receed noticeably after about 1 year of daily use... trying to switch to gum now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I think that's my biggest fear about using them. I think I'll keep an eye out for that at well. If it starts to happen, I'll probably just quit nicotine. I can't put stuff in my lungs and I hate gum.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    nicotine independently damages the endothelium (innermost lining of blood vessels) leading to stroke heart attack poor wound healing after injury or surgery etc. even without tobacco

    probably why it damages gums

    not worth the very small benefits

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Fuck this to hell. I want tobacco to go extinct, not be more accessible.

    If there was a button that just made every tobacco plant (and the backups in that one seed vault place) die, I would keep pushing it for days just to make sure it was all gone. Including existing smoking products.

    Not sorry not sorry. Addicts all going cold turkey that day.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    As a nicotine addict, I wouldn't advise this. Making every one of us go cold turkey in one moment will be the end of humanity. Nicotine withdrawal is no joke.

    I don't understand your fury to be honest. It's unhinged. So what happened to make you feel this way?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    At this point I think it's safe to say we're locked into the dystopian future and the utopic one was but a dream.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 8 months ago

    Fun fact:
    The guy that coined the term Utopia, actually meant for it to act as a pun, for "no such place" or to imply it was a false dream.
    Such as, people will use the mirage of a utopia to hide the very real dystopia that this path creates.

    A Eutopia is an actually "good place". A thing we have not been working towards. George Orwell also called his society a Utopia as it was a false good place.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Like when they offer smoke breaks.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    No reason any worker couldn't just throw em in the trash, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 8 months ago

    I imagine you would be fired and charged for destruction of property and then they would make you feel bad by having you apologize to your coworkers for hindering their ability to put forth more work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (13 children)

    I mean, tech jobs and stimulants have always gone hand in hand. My theory is that's because the field attracts a lot of people with ADHD.

    This is functionally no different than a company providing coffee.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago (12 children)

    I'm as much of a "caffeine is an addictive psychoactive drug" person as the next but nicotine is so much worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (11 children)

    By itself it isn't. It's all the other bullshit in tobacco that is so much worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    No, it's true. The LD50 for nicotine is only 0.8mg/kg, but for caffeine the LD50 is 192mg/kg.

    The other bullshit in tobacco does make it worse than pure nicotine, but just pure nicotine is more dangerous than pure caffeine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    I mean I consume maybe 6-7 mg of nicotine, but probably less, per day by vaping. At 0.8mg/kg I would have to consume over 80 to reach LD50 and I believe that has to be in your blood at once.

    My caffeine intake is around 400 mg per day. LD50 is over 20 literal grams.

    Going by these numbers it does indeed sound like the nicotine is worse, but neither one is ever going to get close to the LD50. If I were to significantly increase my nicotine intake, it'd get nauseating for me pretty fast. Caffeine I could probably double without noticing a damn thing, but beyond that I think it will start affecting me too much too.

    Also that's over a day, whereas I believe LD50 implies it'd have to be in your blood all at once?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Nicotine is a poison, many or most of the cardiac issues associated with smoking are due to nicotine, not the ancillary chemicals in cigarette smoke.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    That's not true.

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4958544/.

    Also, the dose makes the poison. Humans safely consume all kinds of things that would be harmful in large quantities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Did you read the study? The abstract asserts that vaping is less bad than smoking cigarettes, but there’s a ton of negative cardiovascular effects they link to nicotine alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Amlodipine.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Is there some not-yet-specified condition of broad moral-displacement inherent to surveillists?

  • source