top 52 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This can’t possibly be a surprise to people?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    How about we ban hidden cameras in public?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    Careful with this. Some French journalists (Cash Investigation) got some nice sequences by using hidden cameras, and I guess from the ads that the camera is not hidden, just tiny... I hate tese glasses with guts as they showed in one ad how people can hate it and thought let's fucking send it

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 84 points 8 months ago (29 children)

    I thought smart glasses could be kind of neat, but no way in hell would I get a pair from Meta.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 8 months ago (15 children)

    A set of FOSS smart glasses powered entirely by local hardware and software that you own and control? That would be kind of neat.

    Anything connected to and under the control of a big corporation, though ... miss me with that shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 8 months ago (13 children)

    Call me conservative but I think that would still suck. A society where everyone has a camera on their nose pointing at you sounds absolutely dreadful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -28 points 8 months ago (12 children)

    Eh, you're already on a dozen cameras every time you go outside. Security cameras, state surveillance cameras, doorbell cameras, cameras all over every modern car... What's a few more?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 8 months ago

    No I don‘t because I don‘t live in an Orwellian hellhole (yet) like most people seem to do these days. Even if I did your comment is an admission of absolute capitulation. What a sad worldview.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    If you see a ring door bell, they aren’t hard to kick or rip off the wall.

    Actually I’m going to make some informative stickers that happen to cover the camera and sensor of those things. I’ll post them when they’re up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    If you see a ring door bell, they aren’t hard to kick or rip off the wall.

    It is a bit more difficult, however, to do that without being caught, since they'll probably have camera footage of you doing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Ah yes. The fallacy of you're already being exploited so what's one more time?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Really, though -- is that not true?

    There is already no expectation of privacy and anonymity anymore. Cameras are already everywhere, more and more of them interconnected and tracking your every step. If you want privacy and anonymity outside of your own home, you need to be wearing a mask, and maybe taking measures to disguise your gait and physical proportions as well. Having slightly more or slightly fewer cameras out there isn't going to change that whatsoever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (10 children)

    I wish I can look back at my entire day and see what I did. (It will mostly just be computer, kitchen and bathroom only, but still a cool idea)

    I changed my mind

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    I usually use my memory when I want to look back on my entire day and know what I did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Right? Such a great invention. Quality is not always great but huge storage capacity and amazing privacy protections. And its free!

    👀 1
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    When I look at my game recordings, I can see my mistakes/places to improve.

    If I see the steam overlay saying 150 minutes game time, its like "eh. Its long, but I had fun". But if I see an over 2 hour clip of me not leaving my chair, that will make a bigger impact, reminding me how little I do every day

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Or you can just use your common sense and save yourself the cost of this ugly piece of junk.

    People tend to avoid you less if you don't look like a sneaky perv, so that's another bonus.

    Plus, you'll not be funding Meta and you'll have one less piece of rubbish in a drawer somewhere that needs recycling after one month of use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I'm NEVER buying a Meta product. I'm just saying camera glasses is a cool idea. Shame that its tied being a terrible company.

    And if you noticed, I only mentioned using it in my own home. Never out in public.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Enhance your calm, I agree with you.

    It's one of those things that sounds great in sci-fi, like flying cars, until you realise that the world is full of awful people that immediately repurpose any new tech for filthy lucre / inflicting suffering / power grabbing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Entire_History_of_You

    You'll maybe reevaluate that position after watching this episode of Black Mirror.

    Endlessly torturing yourself over minute details throughout each day doesn't sound fun or healthy to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Well... Fuck

    I'm glad I have the day off tomorrow cause now I need to process some stuff...

    I've heard good things about the show, but that was my first episode I watched. Are they all this good?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    For the first few seasons, yeah!

    When Netflix bought the rights there was a shift to Americanisation of everything and it started to go downhill but there's still some decent episodes from that period as well. But the best episodes are the oldest ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago*

    Who needs to video their day to torture thenselves with minute details throughout each day, your brain can pull that info up any time it is inconvenient to you and run through it for hours

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago
    [–] 13 points 8 months ago

    Who watches the watchers?

    Meta apparently

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    What's with the weird comma placement in the, title?

    I know its not you, OP

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    You mean the “, too”? That’s how it’s supposed to be written. People often don’t do it that way, but that’s how it’s correctly used, and few have accused us anglophones, as a whole, of really understanding how to use our own damn language. It’s the same with “, but”, also, and “, also”, also.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    I'm also an anglophone, but this seems not quite right to me. There's no real need to insert a comma in that sentence, as there's no real need to pause for clarity or pacing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    It’s not about need exactly, it’s about a writing convention. Also, we do have these pauses in our speech/that’s where we would insert those pauses naturally, they’re just often very subtle.

    A lot of language, no matter what you speak, has a lot of these subtleties that are so engrained as to be almost unnoticeable. I’m at a pretty high intermediate level French and, because of the closeness with English, I’m actually learning quite a lot about why English is the way it is, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    they don't care, and that's the point.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    An ant doesn't care that you're watching it until you try to step on it. Why do you think that these bug people would care until it's too late?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    I bought a pair exclusively for masturbation as the thought of those facebook employees having to watch is so hot.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago*

    Without the Meta layer (which you can just not install), the basic smart RayBans are actually pretty nice. The audio is pretty good and it works with any other assistant you may have configured. I wish they had a version without the camera.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    “Nah it’s fine, big companies would never do such a thing. Besides they’re beholden to the governments.”

    Right.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    sensitive and personal footage captured by the devices—including people going to the bathroom, getting dressed, and having sex—is being reviewed

    I wanna know... Or maybe I don't... Who is it that sees someone wear these glasses and decides that they wanna f--- them WITH THE GLASSES ON.

    Don't get me wrong, I wear (normal) glasses and I like the way I look, but how can THESE glasses be anything but a major turn off?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 13 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 40 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Jokes on them, I only wear my Meta Glasses when I’m furiously masturbating.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    At some point, some DIY person will come up with a way to disable these things in their presence.

    And they will make bank.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Maybe something similar to how microphone blockers work, flood a space with EM radiation outside the typical human visible range.

    Or i think i've heard of ways to detect when someone has one of these near you (identifying bluetooth signals and such), in which case you can look around for who has glasses thick enough to hold a camera and shine a laser in their camera/eye. That could have too many false positives though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago*

    Dear smart glasses wearers,

    You're colossal pieces of shit. And dumb as a bag of socks, morons who are paying companies for the privilege of spying on strangers without their consent. You're helping to enable a world where privacy literally doesn't exist and every public moment of every person's life, whether they want to participate or not, is being mined and monetized by billionaires.

    You are lower than pond scum. You're the shit under the back of the toilet bowl that has never been cleaned. You are actually stupid. Like, actually braindead. You are paying actual money to be exploited. At least Facebook and Instagram are free. Seriously, what kind of dumbass would pay to have Mark Zuckerberg sit on their face all day? Fucking idiots. 🤣

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Kenyans are watching you masturbate.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    seems a little "no duh"

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    I thought they were talking about Nearby Glasses for a minute.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    I'll say it upfront; I didnt read the article but based on the title this article will only preach to the choir. These people dont give a single fuck about their own privacy until the police are knocking on their door because they pissed off the wrong person and they have video evidence from meta.

  • source