top 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 84 points 8 months ago (1 child)

The files show extensive ties to Israeli, Saudi Arabi, and UAE elites as well. It's as straight-cut on class boundries as possible

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 46 points 8 months ago

    Also? The "we're mad about pedophiles" conspiracy crowd don't get credit when they decided to put Absolute Biggest Sex Crime Guy in charge of their movement and stay onboard when he says "I'm not releasing the evidence".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 51 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (9 children)

    To add onto this, the Epstein case wasn't even a conspiracy theory. He got a plea deal in 2008 under the Bush Admin and a case was built against him under Bush and Obama culminating in an arrest of Epstein and Maxwell, and Maxwell's trial then sentencing from 2016 to 2018.

    We also knew Trump was involved because Trump told us so on Television in 2002, and we had seen televised footage of the two attending parties together in 1992, and Epstein even mentioned it in his deposition in 2010.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    There was conspiring, so it was a conspiracy.

    It wasn't a conspiracy theory, because it was a confirmed conspiracy. But too many people don't know the difference between a conspiracy and a conspiracy theory.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah I figured the context made it clear that we were speaking of theories.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    You said it "wasn't even a conspiracy" when what you meant was "it wasn't even a theory."

    No, the context doesn't make it so clear that you can say the opposite of what you mean and expect no one to correct you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The Miami Herald had published a lot of stories by the time Q came around. So all Q was was projection. Every accusation is a confession, there are no exceptions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    As someone who entered adulthood around the mid-10s, it was hard to keep track of what was real and what was bullshit between things like Anonymous, WikiLeaks, QAnon, and the Epstein files.

    It was really hard to sort the nonsense from reality. Or more accurately by volume, the reality from the nonsense.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    This is what I hate about the "broken clock is right twice a day" thing. The process you use to get to a conclusion needs to be sound for it to matter. If you have a couple thousand stopped clocks showing different times, you can't claim to always know the correct time just because it's in there somewhere.

    Sure, atrazine causes birth defects in frogs. If you tell me that frogs are being intentionally turned gay because the globalists are using them to test a chemical weapon that will be used to turn people gay so that they'll stop reproducing as part of a global depopulation plan, then you support a president who relaxes regulations on chemical disposal including atrazine, you don't get to wait for most people to forget all that context and claim your initial kernel of partial-truth as a victory. This is exactly the same thing, and we see it over and over and over and over.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    My mother in law guessed the sex of my baby, twice. She guess both girl and boy. Then when the baby pictures arrived, she was really smug: "See, I told you! I have a feeling about these things!".

    That's when I knew to never listen to another word she says.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Also, some conspiracies are always going to be right, but the details matter.

    "There's a cabal of rich people who run the world!" I mean, yes. Obviously. But, the method matters here.

    "Rich people make blood sacrifices in cult meetings, then replace the president with an android and the prime minister with a clone" is not the same as "rich people buy up newspapers and throw lavish fundraising dinners."

    As for the main conspiracy, IMO it's not credible that everybody in Epstein's circle was a pedophile. It's not even credible that everyone in his circle knew he was one. I'm sure you don't become a billionaire without already being the kind of person who has a problem with empathy. But, Epstein's circle wasn't just billionaires. It was also intellectuals, politicians, artists, etc. Even if 99% of them were either pedophiles or perfectly OK with pedophilia (which seems unlikely) that remaining 1% could ruin his life.

    What's believable is that he had an enormous circle of rich and powerful people, and that a small subset of them were in an inner circle where the child rape happened. In that case, it isn't that every rich and powerful person is part of a pedophile ring. It's that rich and powerful people were meeting and conspiring, and also some of them were pedophiles.

    Having said that, I'm perfectly happy if the popular story is that everybody who was buddies with Epstein is a pedophile and should be removed from society, if not removed from the realm of the living. Those people deserve that kind of punishment, but not because they're pedophiles. But, it's too exhausting to try to convince people that someone like Bill Gates deserves to have his life ruined, even if he isn't a pedophile.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    It's worth reminding that the 4chan founder is in the Epstein files discussing the launch of conspiracy theories to manipulate the masses.

    Right after the discussion, the 4chan "political" channel is created, filled with conspiracy theories, and will lead to QAnon.

    The pizzagate was a most likely a planned diversion.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The CT's were as they always were.

    Right about some things. Wrong about others. The FBI publicizing footage that shouldn't exist in order to make themselves look good in the Guthrie case, however, should be making everyone reconsider how they use and store their electronics.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    That footage came from a cloud connected camera; google's cloud.

    There is no conspiracy there. If you use a Google device, they are storing all of that data even if they will not give you access to it without a court order.

    The FBI is run my bumbling idiots. The delay is because they didn't know how to ask properly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Personally, I think the MAGA conspiracy theorists were deliberately engineered by the elite to create anti-LGBTQ+ theories. By projecting a myriad of false conspiracy theories, it helps discredit the actual conspiracy.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Jeffrey Epstein suggested that Moot add /pol/ to 4chan. /pol/ is literally where Qanon started. All of the “Wayfair is selling children” and “there is a video of Hillary Clinton killing a child for their ‘adenochrome’” conspiracies started there.

    /pol/ is also where the “MAPS/minor attracted person” bullshit started, as an attempt to discredit LGBT people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    Are you sure? Seems like /pol/ was planned before they met. I'd be happy to be proven wrong though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    He started it the day after they met. Behind the Bastards just did a series on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Sure, and that's clear from the emails. That said, I heard from someone familiar with the situation, that it was well known to (some) site members that they were going to add it for some time before that.

    The timing is a going indication of causation, but it's no proof, especially when there's a plausible alternative.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Lumping every single conspiracy theorist together as if they had a unified belief system is silly.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (4 children)

    Follow the bread crumb trail on a lot of these assholes and they all run through the same set of alt-right media intent on radicalizing people into hating one another and eventually killing them.

    Whether its the "Haitians ate my dog" hoax or the "Hamas is running Columbia's student unions" canard or the "Comet Ping Pong is a hide out for ritual child cannibalism", the goal is to turn people against one another and justify violence against them through the police.

    The apex of the modern conspiracy theory is the lie about Evil Immigrants Sneaking Across The Border to Do Crime. And the consequence of believing it is a bipartisan government support for ICE kidnappings and concentration camps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    There have been plenty of conspiracy theories that have been proven true. MK Ultra, Big Tobacco, Big Sugar. The entirety of the CIA's history has basically been the story of insane conspiracy theories proven correct.

    There is evidence that Epstein and his associates used food- themed code language, including "pizza", to refer to child rape. A lot of the antisemitic conspiracy theories about Jews have turned out to be accurate reports on Zionists, who have been purposefully trying to conflate themselves with Judaism to hide under the umbrella of semitic protections.

    The famous "they're turning the frogs gay!" story Alex Jones made famous was actually a true story about how a factory on the West Coast was illegally dumping dangerous chemicals into the water which impacts the hormones, and this the sex ratio, of frogs nearby.

    Afaik there isn't any sort of official body governing conspiracy theories. It's hundreds of thousands of individuals trying to make sense of a world in imperfect information. They all need to be judged individually. A lot of them are just plain bigoted or mentally ill in other ways. Some people are kind of close to being right, some people are dead on. It's foolish to try to lump them all together.

    And what's the point of trying to dismiss all conspiracy theorists as racist lunatics? Is the end goal to get people to stop questioning official government narratives? Fuck that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    MK Ultra, Big Tobacco, Big Sugar.

    These aren't conspiracy theories. They're well documented, exhaustively researched, and heavily reported upon programs and organizations.

    The conspiracy theories came about as attempts to cover up the above. The Helter Skelter motivation, which then bled into increasingly lured claims about rock music being mind control and a race war prophecy were the conspiracy theories. These claims helped cover up MK Ultra as a project and deflected state effects at manipulating civilians onto mass media and The Culture War.

    Similarly, it wasn't "Big Tobacco" that was the conspiracy, but the repeated denial-ism funded by tobacco corporations which sought to conflate restrictions on smoking with some kind of police state pogrom on the working class. The same game got played with asbestos and lead paint and motorcycle helmets and seat belts. Wave after wave of reactionary media funded by libertarian-aligned business interests tried to blame the victim or mystify the source of harm.

    "Big Sugar" is a complete misnomer, as the shift to corn syrup over sugar was in direct response to the Cuban Revolution and the sudden shortfall in sugar supplies following the US embargo. That, again, wasn't any kind of conspiracy. But the increasingly aggressive sales tactics of soft drink salespeople certainly created misconceptions about their benefits and hazards.

    And what’s the point of trying to dismiss all conspiracy theorists as racist lunatics?

    Yes, why would anyone conflate eugenics, phrenology, and other pseudo-scientific claims of racial superiority, or the increasingly apocalyptic predictions of social collapse coming from segregationists and their business allies, might feed into conspiracy media.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    These aren't conspiracy theories

    Anymore because

    They're [now] well documented, exhaustively researched, and heavily reported upon programs and organizations.

    Now they're conspiracy facts. But they did start as "theories" before all the proof came out. Time travel to before 1975 and mention government mind control programs however, and I am confident you'll get a different response regarding MK Ultra than you would today after what documents that weren't destroyed have been declassified. Same goes for MK Naomi, Groom Lake/Area 51, the CIA's psychic spying program out of Monroe VA, etc, before being declassified (and even after in most cases) it is "you're crazy," and then come to find out after declassification "nuh uh, I was right."

    Edit: in fact now that I think of it you don't even have to go back that far. Even in the 90s when you would talk about it, only the people into it knew. Now all the casuals know because of podcasts like LPOTL and other internet sources, but before the internet was commonplace (and even after, for those who were late adopters) still there were people who didn't believe it, but then you could tell them "go look it up" and they actually may instead of "go buy this book" which is a harder sell. We really take for granted how well the internet can be and was used to disseminate information, though with all the misinformation around now I can see why people have forgotten.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago

    “Not all conspiracy theorists”

    no true scotsman, sure. but the line in the sand was drawn to point out specific problematic theorists. the ones claiming that we are all plugged in the matrix can continue with out being talked about here

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    By the time that Q thing got started, the Miami Herald had long been publishing details of Epstein, so all they did was take the villains and project their behavior onto the opponents of rw extremism, figuring it would never catch up to them.

    So no, they don't deserve any credit. They just misdirected the villainy. That's negative credit.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    There were 100% conspiracy theorists who said it were powerful/rich white people. Why do you think stuff like X-Files was so popular in the 90s. People suspected clubs like that trying to rig everything.

    Yes, some of them said it would be the jews or whatever, but that's only a part of the many, wild speculations and could have been racism.

    But you don't owe any of them an apology, because they knew it was hard to prove and just theories/suspicions at this point.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    You are lumping in every conspiracy theorist in with the Q people here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    well, the OP says "conspiracy theorists" in the image and the title. i didn't assume it was just about Qs, but could be they meant just them and were intenionally or unintentionally confusing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    They always like to lump all conspiracies together and discount the lot of them by associating them all with the crazy ones. JFK case and point, dumbass theories are used to discount all the real conspiracies that the fbi and cia and other elements of the establishment were heavily involved in the assassination and it's cover up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    Not sure the guy who sucked Bubba is straight

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The conspiracy invents stupid theories to discredit the real ones duh.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    We do need to talk about Epsteins very real ties to Israel though, too and the fact Isreal is engaging in very serious and very real human rights violations.

    Isreal is very much so at the heart and we can't forget that either but as a result I DO feel bad for normal Jewish people who will be pushed into insane conspiracy theories and they did nothing wrong.

    Reference on Epsteins Isreal ties: https://youtu.be/j1AoPlJgEBQ

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    Yes that is the end goal. It’s why there has been no discussion of the fact that Trump stole the 2024 election. The previous crybaby conspiracy fuckery immunized the public discourse to prevent any contemplation of stolen elections.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    What do you folks think about requesting to delete this for the amount of mis-/disinformation?

    (I am not a mod, I just wanna know what others think)

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 8 months ago (19 children)

    Not too sure these guys are very straight. Sex isn’t even the key driver. It’s to humiliate others, to make others suffer for your pleasure.

    It looks like Paraphilic disorder more than anything else I’ve seen.

    Also Epstein was Jewish.

    It’s far more complicated than a simple 4 paragraph twitter take I think.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    Also Epstein was Jewish.

    Whiteness and being Jewish have a complicated relationship but for the last few decades at least, someone can be both.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago

    I mean Epstein was Jewish, boasted about being a Mossad agent in private, Ghislaine Maxwell is Jewish and the daughter of an Israeli spy. Top ranking Israeli officials like Ehud Barak are in the files, people like Noam Chomsky are in the files. Yeah there’s a lot of WASPs in there too, according to Epstein the only goyims he respected, but OP is being disingenuous by omitting all this.

    Yeah MAGAts are retarded and imo religion is anyway not the important point to focus on but anyone can read the files so why accuse others of rewriting history and then doing it yourself?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Why couldn't someone be a white jew before?? Of course they could. Is this some usa centric thing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

    They weren't considered white in early 20th century Europe either... There was a whole thing about it...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    German Jews weren't white? Of course they were, and I don't really care for "what the nazis (or other racist group) considered them as".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Being white is a fully made up concept and not some biological reality so "what the Nazis considered them as" is literally just as valid as whatever idea you have about what white is. All it really comes down to how is society treats the given group.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    "whiteness" as a whole tends to a category that gets smaller the more powerful racists become in government. jews are white up until american christofacists no longer need their support at which point they're no longer white

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    In the abridged interview with Maria Farmer, which I posted in this community yesterday, she speaks of massive Zionist elements in this. And she also says that none of the victims were Jewish, to her knowledge.

    Sure, it's accusations, but I think quite important to keep in mind. Has anyone heard of any Jewish victims? And as you say, Epstein was Jewish, but he also had massive Israeli ties, as did/does Maxwell.

    I could make a sourced list at some point to point to all the Zionist connections, but I think this is really well established already.

    It's right to differentiate between half-truth conspiracy psyops and actual conspiracy, which has a legal definition too. But this poster oversimplified it to the point of another half-truth of mis-/disinformation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (6 children)

    Some stuff on the Israeli & Zionist ties of the innermost parts of the network.

    Epstein ran Leslie Wexner's Pro-Israel Philanthropy Machine

    quote source

    On paper, the Wexner family’s philanthropic foundation and their retail empire, once home to Victoria’s Secret, Abercrombie & Fitch, and Bath & Body Works, were legally separate and largely had their own staff. But, in practice, as is typical of such foundations, one small family office sat over both the family’s fortune and philanthropy. Internal emails between Epstein, Indyke, and Wexner’s staff show Epstein as the effective boss of the family office, and the real gatekeeper of the Wexners’ money.

    Epstein supporting Israeli PM

    quote source

    Interestingly, Barak was relying on Epstein’s support rather than vice versa, despite the fact that Barak was a very powerful figure in the Israeli security establishment. And so, these emails, in addition to House disclosures, which also point to the same information, show that this intelligence agent, who was a longtime military intelligence agent in Israel, who was Barak’s chief aide for many years, lived at Epstein’s house for significant stretches of time, weeks at a time, between this period of 2013 to 2015.

    quote source

    The Israeli government installed security equipment and controlled access to a Manhattan apartment building managed by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to a set of emails recently released by the Department of Justice. The equipment was installed starting in early 2016 at 301 E. 66th Street—the residence where former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak frequently stayed for stretches at a time.

    Funding of Zionist groups

    quoted source

    Through Epstein’s COUQ Foundation, he provided Friends of the Israeli Defence Forces (FIDF) and the Jewish National Fund (JNF) with funds on at least one occasion, when he gifted $25,000 to the FIDF and $15,000 to the JNF in 2006.

    According to the FIDF’s website, the organisation funds programmes for Israeli soldiers. Through its website, the organisation invites donors to adopt a brigade or battalion, such as the 97th Netzah Yehuda Battalion, which has been widely accused of killing unarmed civilians, killing detainees, torture, and mistreatment.

    On Maxwell

    quoted source

    [Robert] Maxwell poured money into the Israeli economy and died in mysterious circumstances after he was said to have fallen from his yacht in 1991, after embezzling millions from his company’s pension fund.

    Epstein himself appeared to have suspected that the Israeli Mossad intelligence agency had a role in Maxwell’s death. An email Epstein sent in 2018 had the subject line “he was passed away”, referring to Maxwell.

    In the message, Epstein claimed that Maxwell had previously threatened Israel’s intelligence service, writing that “unless they [the Mossad] gave him £400 million to save his [Maxwell’s] crumbling empire, he would expose all he had done for them”.

    Unverified Zionist ties

    quoted source

    An FBI memo produced by the bureau’s Los Angeles field office in October 2020 reported that one of its sources had come to believe Epstein “was a co-opted Mossad agent”.

    According to the document, the disgraced financier was described as having been “trained as a spy” for Israel’s intelligence service.

    The source also claimed Epstein maintained links to US and allied intelligence circles through his longtime lawyer Alan Dershowitz, the Harvard University law professor whose network, it said, included “many students from wealthy families”. Among those cited were Jared Kushner, US President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and envoy, and his brother, Josh Kushner, both described in the memo as former students.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    So, sorry, "rich, straight, white right-wing Christian men" is just misinformation/disinformation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Plenty of Christian men in there: Trump, Bannon, Musk

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I don’t associate any of those people with performative Christianity in any way.

    Trump is Christian only part time since he got into politics; I haven’t heard that musk is religious even in name. Don’t know about Bannon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    I'm not arguing that.

    The Epstein files uncovered a conspiracy of rich, straight, white right-wing Christian men

    They did not, or only very partially so. This is misleading/downplaying the Zionist elements, for one, as well as the diverse background of various characters.

    The poster shuts down the Jewish part of the conspiracy and then spins it as the quoted thing, leaving out any mention of those elements.

    Edit: fixed quote

    Edit2: to avoid making another comment, I'll write another issue with the post here. I'm sorry for the fragmented way of posting. I'll take it as a learning experience to take my time and write a single comprehensive comment for things like this in the future.

    it was just dudes emailing each other in plaintext asking for directions to the Sex Trafficking Island

    That's not the criminal conspiracy. That's just the collected and partly published emails of Epstein, which the DoJ collected.

    It's also inaccurate because the trafficking is at least alleged by multiple victims to have taken place at Mar-a-Lago and other locations. (Virginia Giuffre in her book nobody's girl, as one example).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

    No hate to regular everyday Jewish people much respect but Israel and the Zionists are a real problem and threat to the world.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Yes. Sadly. I feel genuinely bad for Jewish people. Zionist's are like the Taliban or West Borough Baptist Church. Same flavor of extremist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Worse because they’ve infiltrated our government’s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    More international, yes. Which makes them very concerning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    But yeah I do feel bad for regular hard working Jewish people because they keep claiming they represent all Jewish people. People are getting more and more angry and the gaslighting isn’t working anymore but I’m continually shocked how many people don’t understand that Epstein and Ghisline worked for Mossad. They absolutely gave Russia a back channel to the US and Israel but the entire operation was for Mossad and Israel’s benefit

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Wasn't Epstein a Mossad asset? So Jews were involved.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    yes, there's a heavy connection between the zionists that run israel. whose interest happen to align heavily with the christo-facists and general rich bastards of the USA (who largely just want israel to act as a destabilizer for the ME, so they don't unify into another great power).

    the interesting bit is Israel really doesn't have that much loyalty to the USA, as evidenced by pretty nuch any presser they do in hebrew (because most of their US-based zionists/supporters only speak english).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Ive been seeing shit about how the unibomber was right all along. And we should have listened.

    He murdered a ton of innocent people.

    He was bat shit crazy.

    Just cause some stuff was kinda almost true doesn't mean anything.

    Nostradamus also had some predictions that weren't too far off. But only because they were vague (barnum effect) and also he had a lot more that were false.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    He murdered a ton of innocent people.

    He killed 3 people. The first was an innocent grad student. The second worked for a major corporation and was killed because he "helped Exxon clean up its public image after the Exxon Valdez incident [in 1989]." The third worked for the California Forestry Association and was not the intended target.

    So he murdered 2 innocent people; I think it's arguable whether a person complicit in crimes against the environment and humanity can be framed as innocent.

    He injured another 23 people, one of whom was in the Epstein emails. He wasn't actually a particularly lethal bomber, he just really scared people because no one really knew why they were being targeted, which made it feel like anyone could be the next target.

    I wouldn't endorse his actions or even his targets, but it wasn't just that he said "some stuff that was kinda almost true". He targeted evil people in positions of power... sometimes. Usually he targeted people who were totally innocent, and worse, he knew that's what he was doing (in most cases).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Isn't "Epstein" a jewish surname?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    I'm not sure, but his ethnic lineage isn't connected to why he's evil any more than European lineage is why wealthy white Americans are evil.

    But, just like European heritage is perverted into white supremacy, he perverted his heritage (real or imagined, idk) into Jewish supremacy. This was demonstrated by the emails suggesting that the more Jewish someone is, the smarter they are, which is presumably why they had DNA tests on the island. (Which is also a bit odd because Zionists are generally very much anti-DNA testing. But maybe he was more into the basic supremacy aspect than the actual Zionist dogma.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    No, they're not.

    Conspiracies abound and are proven right with regularity

    They are also proven wrong with regularity.

    There are thousands of conspiracies around the world at any one time. Some conspiracy theorists are wrong, and some are right.

    To declare otherwise is stupid, read a book you fucking moron

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    That's a super dumb take.

    Just because something is wrong, doesn't mean it wasn't a valuable contribution on our journey to a truth.

    The general accusation to conspiracy theorists is that it's all wrong and all super ridiculously obviously wrong, like flat earth. A "medium severe" conspiracy theory like "it's rich people who are kidnapping and raping kids" barely gets attention.

    It's also making the mistake of treating "conspiracy theorists" as a monolith, which they're not.

    Finally:

    Until something is officially declared a crime and a legal accusation is made, people are officially, legally innocent. Which means everyone saying "Epstein didn't kill himself" or "Donald Trump is involved in a child trafficking operation", is a conspiracy theorist.

    Which probably means you too.

    What it comes down to is this: the next time you hear something ridiculous, but evil about the government, do you dismiss it, or do you research it? Because we know who will tell you to "move along" and there is "nothing to see".

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago*

    Conspiracy theories are generally very big, very serious accusations being made confidently without serious evidence.

    The prevalence of conspiracy theories does indeed make it harder for people who want to stay grounded in reality to accept criticism of the powerful – this is one of the harms of conspiracy theories. It makes it harder for genuine serious criticism to be taken seriously – this is why the Putin regime allows conspiracy theorists, but persecutes serious regime critics.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Until something is officially declared a crime and a legal accusation is made, people are officially, legally innocent. Which means everyone saying "Epstein didn't kill himself" or "Donald Trump is involved in a child trafficking operation", is a conspiracy theorist.

    Courts determine criminal liability withing the justice system. They do not determine truth itself. When properly designed and used, the legal system should trend towards truth, but actual truth is a separate thing entirely. The unifying aspect of conspiracy theorists is completely naive epistemology. You guys are actually doing epistemology but you just refuse to actually look at the thousands of years of work that's been done in the field across civilizations all over the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Until something is officially declared a crime and a legal accusation is made, people are officially, legally innocent. Which means everyone saying "Epstein didn't kill himself" or "Donald Trump is involved in a child trafficking operation", is a conspiracy theorist.

    What? No just because something is not yet verified by court does not mean that you are a conspiracy theoriest for believing it. If there is sufficent evidence it is okay to believe in something. There is sufficent evidence Trump is involved in the whole thing. Epstein didn't kill himself is a bit more tricky because there are different theories, he got killed is not all impropable especially with how the whole thing was handled so for me it hardly qualifies as a conspiracy theory in the collequial sense. He fleed, there was a body double and he now lives carefree somewhere? Not impossible but currently not enough evidence so i would declare it a conspiracy theory.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    It’s also making the mistake of treating “conspiracy theorists” as a monolith, which they’re not.

    It pretty much was. The qanon nonsense functioned as an umbrella conspiracy theory, which pretty much coopted all other conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago*

    If you can see what a cult/psyop can do to influence people's beliefs (Q), certainly you can then see that a lot of conspiracy spaces are manipulated by bots and other people in bad faith doing the same thing.

    Not every conspiracy theorist forms beliefs - they could merely be hypothesizing/speculating. Not every conspiracy theorist believes in everything posted in these spaces, and not every conspiracy theorist follows Q and other cults like it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Im sending this to my sister..

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    The conspiracy theorists are wrong of course, buy let's not pretend Epstein wasn't an Israeli asset.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Ah, yes, another day in The System Is Working Exactly As Intended timeline (v42.66)

    Wheee.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Who is this and why should I care?

    They were talking about a secret conspiracy of gay trans Jewish lizard people

    Not a good sign when you want to appeal to nuances and yet don't mind clearly creating lambastic non-realistic caricatures which you expect people to tacitly agree illustrates all conspiracy theorists. This argument is only pandering to an audience that's just looking for self-acknowledgement.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Agreed this entire post is super inflammatory

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Sort of suspicious that something comes up that could serve to bridge the gap between different ends of the population, and arguments like this start to get passed around to continue to keep people divided against themselves over the actual pedophile ironically using the same flaws in logic they claim to criticize.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago

    Where does this leave the victims? Are they racist antisemitic pedophiles who cannot be trusted or did they spontaneously come into existence somehow? Not sure where they fit into this coping mechanism.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    31 comments in c/peoplebluesky@lemmy.world view that post