If we emptied the account of every rich asshole like this we would achieve the same thing AND lose a whole class of dickbags that think they should be in charge.
post
Doctors I trust more than Doctor Oz, Doctor Phil, or RFK Jr.
Doc Brown
Doc Hollywood
Doctor Bombay
Doctor Claw
Doctor Demento
Doctor Detroit
Doctor Dirty
Doctor Dolittle
Doctor Doofenshmirtz aka Dr. D or just “Doof”
Doctor Doom
Doctor Evil
Doctor Feelgood
Doctor Frankenstein
Doctor Hannibal Lecter
Doctor Horrible
Doctor Jekyll
Doctor Leonard H. "Bones" McCoy
Doctor Martens
Doctor Moreau
Doctor Nick
Doctor Otto Octavius
Doctor Pepper
Doctor Scholl's
Doctor Orin Scrivello
Doctor Seuss
Doctor Spaceman
Doctor Spock
Doctor Strange
Doctor Strangelove
Doctor Who
Doctor Zhivago
Doctor Zoidberg
Dr. Dre
Dr. Enuf
Dr. Tran
Rug Doctor
Even Nurse Ratchet
You left out Doctor Kevorkian
Even Nurse Ratchet
I'm convinced she's a Deputy Secretary at HHS somewhere in the Trump org chart.
Dr. Tran
You forgot:
Doc Johnson
Doc Gooden
Dr J, Julius Irving
The Doctor, ST:Voyager
Doc Johnson
LOL How did I miss that one.
THANKS for playing!
And don't forget the Spin Doctors!
Doctor Cat M.D!

This is a real doctor. Too confusing or not funny. https://beautybydrcat.com/
Ha! What an odd coincidence, and yet I'm not surprised!
Well, for the record, the webcomic cat would do things like get distracted and lose mousey toys during surgery, and I'd still trust him over Oprah's favorite daytime human scat commentator. Lol
Best of luck on your journey engineering the perfect diss joke. XD
you have to mess up a lot to be less trustworthy than someone called Doctor Evil
Adding $3 trillion in GDP would not remove the debt anyway. Assholes like this one don't even understand how GDP is calculated nor what it means.
You’re not a team player, are you? Work more and work harder. For the team. /s
It's beautifully wrong on so many levels.
- Increasing GDP doesn't address the debt crisis.
- The debt is WAY bigger than 3 trillion
- As long as Trump is in office, the debt will grow, and nothing can be done to change that.
Or we could stop lying about what the national debt is and tax the wealthy to destroy their absurd power.
https://mmt101.substack.com/p/mmt-basics-national-debt-defined
“Please stay in the corporate meat grinder so we can have enough money to fuck kids then bomb them”
That's not how national debt works you absolute ladle.
Americans are trained to believe that our National Debt is some kind of foreign imposed obligation that comes with the threat of sanctions and military intervention if we fail to pay it. Because that's how we handle debts international, it must be how we handle debts internally.
If the government has more income, that just means they have more money to give to corporations and wealthy people.
Because you give them the money, then they use it to generate even more money for the country?
It does come back through taxes? right?
anakin_padame.jpg
But this doesn't give much more income to the government. Even if $3 Trillion more dollar circulated, disregarding job market dillution and lack of skilled labor, then the GOP defficit adds about a trillion per year and this would only generate about 15% taxes on those wages and other wealth transfers or only 450 billion.
Also, that 3Tn number makes no sense because each of 4.5M 18 year olds would have to generate $666,666 revenue.
We’re constantly more productive and never see a reduction in work hours, only more work. You bring this up to one of these fucks or their simps and they say “sure, but when will the work get done?” as if that comment makes even the slightest amount of sense.
The very first thing we all need to do is stop working so hard. The rich don’t have any real skills and they have no power without the people they exploit.
Garbage people produce garbage ideas.
Why not pay off the debt by reducing military spending by 90% for the next thirty years. We would still be in the top three countries for military spending.
This shitty idea is a thousand times better than anything Oz could come up with.
Or if we tax billionaires and corporations…
universal health care would accomplish the same thing
more worker more healthy better economy
You found the only liberal argument for healthcare.
Honestly, those are important arguments and people would be wise to make them.
Outside this bubble that kind of talk is very accepted and desired. Convincing people it's better for the economy, starting a business doesn't risk losing healthcare, businesses now don't need to waste time and money picking health insurance plans, etc. Are all valid arguments and would only help achieve the end goal of universal healthcare.
Just as a heads up, you dont need to carry a balance and be charged interest - you can pay off your cards each month, and thus never accumulating interest, and still have an improved score; simply pay the statement balance before the due date
I've seen people have their cards cancelled for doing this. Rare, but not unheard of.
Well, actually yes, countries paying down their debt is not a good thing.
But they can switch the debt into a form that doesn't pay any interest.
Fucking ghoul. Thanks Oprah for making him famous.
Name one person uplifted by Oprah that's not a fucking ghoul.
Dr Oz, "Dr" Phil, John of God, each more evil than the last.
At least Dr Oz is legitimately a good heart surgeon. If that's all he ever did he'd have been a net positive on the world. As it is, he's caused far more harm to more people than he ever helped.
Did I fuckin miss something? We are 30 trillion in debt.
That's what happens when you give the richest people tax breaks and subsidise all your rich buddies endevours without uplifting the lowest socio-economic portions if society.
The best way to fix the economy is always to give the poorest more money (or less financial burden) because they spend a much higher percentage (usually all) of their excess income to keep afloat or improve their way of life.
The worst way is to give rich people more money. Because they horde it, gamble on non tangible goods (stocks, crypto, "ai" etc), send it off shore, keep it in the family and share it with other rich people etc.
It's ironic that the party that always does the worse thing for the economy and demonises doing the best is seen by the masses as the "good for the economy" party.
'simple, if one extra year is 3T, instead of hiring kids at 16, we hire them at 6' --dr dumbass
Alternatively, actually tax the top 10% at the 37% tax rate for everything earned above $600k, and let the working class try to enjoy a little life, with healthcare coverage.
Bonuses paid in stock should be taxed by the cash value of the stock at time of the bonus of shares gained or 37% of the shares gained go to the government to be sold 1/12 at a time over the next year.
Just 37%?
Why not tax wealth+income above $2 million USD with a 99% tax? Someone having 1 billion then still will have 10 million.
Sell yourself to indentured servitude at 18 and work until you're found dead by the janitor. Your corporate masters need a new Ferrari!
I just retired, during the holidays. I didn't think retiring would be an act of resistance.
Instead of trying to extend the prole's work life by a couple years, we COULD tax billion-dollar companies and their owners by 2% more and make three times as much money!
But we can't! Sorry. Our hands are tied
Also, can't afford minimum wage increase this year, the budget is tight
Oh! Almost forgot! We need a raise of 10% this year, and it's time for our winter break! After winter break, it's spring break. Then we will come back to "work" to pass more important legislation, right before our summer break.
You don't get breaks every year? Damn. Well, life is not fair what can we do later gator
The thing is that he's right, but will these sleazy fucks do anything to actually make it happen? Well let's see what they're to implement...
- A universal healthcare system so Americans are healthier and less stressed? Nope
- Free college so Americans can start their careers as efficiently as possible? Nope
- Free universal daycare for all American parents so they could focus on their careers without being to stressed about where to take their kids? Nope
- Raising the minimum wage to something livable so people don't depend on government programs? Nope
- Investing in public transport so people can more reliably commute to work and find new jobs? Nope
- Strengthening worker rights to ensure that workers are taken care of, thus ensuring their longevity and productivity? Nope
- Passing union friendly policies while prosecuting union busting businesses to make sure American workers feel their hard work isn't being taken advantage of? Nope
- Regulating hazardous workplace conditions to ensure the safety of workers? Nope
So what they fuck do they mean by this? They clearly don't care about the debt or the well being of Americans since they're not willing to do anything about either. No, what they want are results without any of the work needed to achieve it. They're not looking for a more productive economy, they're looking for slaves.
The thing is that he’s right
He's not right. The national debt is way fuckin bigger than 3 trillion. He's also wrong in presuming that an infusion of productivity (tax revenue) can "solve" intentional over-spending. He's just a serial scammer spouting uninformed nonsense to stay relevant.
You mean a simple solution won't work for an exceptionally complex problem? 😱
While we do overspend the bigger problem is we under tax, specifically the rich. Our debt payments are also getting out hand which is going to be a big problem.
You're completely right. It won't solve the debt problem, that can only be solved with a redone trade policy. I'm just saying that in the abstract, its a good direction to go in IF we implement the stuff that I listed in my comment. People will work better if the system works for them. It currently doesn't, and people are just trying to survive.
last time i bothered doing the napkin math, it really wouldn't take much to reduce the national debt to more sustainable pre-9/11 levels. just tax rich cunts (anyone who is a milllionaire) at 60-70's level of taxation for 4 years and it would be paid down to that level within 1 election cycle
I'm not suggesting it would take much, I'm merely suggesting that the dipshit isn't serious and shouldn't be taken seriously in this context. He's not even trying to make a logical, reasoned point (as evidenced by the fact that he's an order of magnitude off on what they national debt is). Here is merely a cog in the maga machine, tasked with saying dumb shit any time a microphone is in front of him.
I would blanket not trust anything from "HR News" and just go somewhere else to find that information. One of their blogs posted here about a month ago was titled something like "Study finds 15% of Reddit content is generated by bots" or whatever.
The catch is that they only say the year and the journal. No hyperlink, no identifier, no author names, no volume + issue, no name of the artcle. After exhausting every article from that journal that year and keyword searching the fuck out of it just in case they were stupid and got the year or journal wrong, the inevitable conclusion is either that HR News is LLM slop with zero fact-checking or that it's written by a human author who will uncritically regurgitate made-up shit they read elsewhere. I'd link you to the discussion, but the post was removed – almost certainly because it was proved to be misinformation.
Yeah, the EPI is a source that I trust to carry its bias and a regard for factual accuracy at the same time. I think it's going to be a good read; thanks!

top 100 comments