top 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 101 points 9 months ago (12 children)

So Sony is now the new RCA. This is a new low for the company. I can't believe that they are gone just like that.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (11 children)

    Well, their TV brand is gone. Their headphones are still the top tier of consumer stuff and price-performance king for studio headphones

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Idk if I used a really bad set of wh1000xm4s but they sucked. Too bassy and muddy. Like more than they should have. I hope their studio headphones are much better in that regard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Maybe it's just because I'm an audio engineer so I was able to EQ them to my taste, but I love my WH-1000XM4 cans. But yeah, their studio cans are both top tier and dirt cheap. MDR-7506, they're like $80 and generally sound like a million bucks because they're used in basically every single recording studio as reference headphones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    That's how I eqed the set I borrowed. I had no eq in Deezer and it was a downloaded flac. It still wasn't great but better than stock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (1 child)

    I have mine set like this. Clear bass can be adjusted further down, just depends on personal taste. 400Hz is the boomy, buttery part of the range so if there's too much boxy-ness you can turn that down judiciously. Keep in mind most musical pitch lives there too, though.

    My preferences are towards a relatively flat sound so my setting reflects that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 57 points 9 months ago (12 children)

    Make a dumb tv and I’ll be a buyer

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Look for "commercial display panels." They're 3-4 times the price of a smart TV, but they are just basic TVs. If you find a bank, hospital, clinic, or any other privacy focused business that's going out of business you can generally pick those used displays up pretty cheap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    Can't you just use any modem TV and not hook it up to the interwebs?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    They will still have those garbage "smart" menus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    What are garbage smart menus that can't be avoided?

    I'm not being funny. I'm still on a Panasonic last gen thin plasma FHD but thinking of upgrading to a LG C5 OLED when they are on final sale when this year models are rolling out. I'm only watching movies through the box connected to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I used to have a TCL soundbar.

    In addition to being extremely mediocre, it promised to integrate with my WiFi so that music could be airplayed through it. After adding it to my WiFi, it still broadcast the open ‘setup’ WiFi network.

    If you joined the setup network, you could SSH into the soundbar as root without a password and dump the dhcp.conf file, which would give anyone access to my home WiFi network. Other TCL models also allowed for root via SSH, but used 12345678 as the password. A skilled hacker could just bot these via wardriving and turn them into network listeners.

    It may have still broadcast the setup network because I blocked the device from accessing the internet. I only ever went poking around on it because I noticed that the setup network kept getting set to the same channels as my home network and it was causing interference. I eventually just factory reset the device so it had no information on it at all.
    After the umpteenth time of not being found by my TV, a hard reset killed it. Just got stuck booting and never recovered.

    Anyway - crap brand. Sad day for Sony TV fans.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    TCL might not make a good sound bar,but I've never seen a bad TCL tv. Are they as nice as Sony? Hell no.

    Do they cost 1/4 the price? Yep.

    Edit: also, PlayStation is the only profit maker for Sony.

    And TCL has been making displays for all of the major OEMs for years now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    Read about that boot issue and how it starts as a "full storage" message. Also how it was outside the warranty period for most cases, so you end up with a literal brick. I'd be pissed if my TV died just a few years in.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 63 points 9 months ago (22 children)

    I had a TCL phone for a bit about 10 years ago and it was the hottest piece of garbage I had ever touched in my life

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (20 children)

    They've really worked to turn that around with their TVs. They're entry level still sure, but for the price it's hard to beat and their quality control on them has taken a big step up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 9 months ago (16 children)

    Their tvs are cheap because of all the ad and Spyware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 9 months ago (15 children)

    You mean the stuff every TV has these days? I also never hook mine to the internet so not really a problem. I haven't seen a single ad in the year I've had mine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    What disgusting cope. Don't you have any self-respect?

    Just because you can work around the abuse doesn't mean they aren't abusing you.

    Edit: people like the commenter above are actively making the world worse by normalizing and even excusing abusive corporate practices. I apologize for nothing!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago

    Dude, touch grass and calm down. You're putting a lot of words in my mouth and completely missing the point which is why you're getting down voted.

    I've pushed back on "smart" TVs so much. My point was if your issue with TCL is the ads you should rightfully have issues with every TV. They're all shoving ads, they're all analysing watched content. This isn't a TCL specific thing at all was my only point.

    Also disconnecting from internet is a direct way of fighting back against that abuse. You're not giving them those analytics or ad space. Sure you can choose to not buy any TV but I clearly keep overestimating people's intelligence and didn't think I needed to spell out every possible option in a quick comment.

    Fuck I hate the braindead keyboard warriors the internet has enabled.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (12 children)

    You can still get dumb tvs.

    Edit: Yall. They are not hard to find. Please do a search of them. They can even be delivered right to your doorstep.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    If you have a link or can tell me what store to walk in and get a dumb TV with even half the quality of my current TV I will take it. I could only find business displays which were all stuck at 60hz or had a color spectrum and contrast so bad my ten year old laptop IPS screen beat them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Well I suspect the quality is not going to be up to your standard, but this is the one I have in my living room, and I think it's perfectly fine. But if you just can't live without 120hz or whatever, then I guess you're stuck.

    Walmart used to have a variety of these, now they're down to one. All my TVs are either 10+ years old or Sceptre and therefore are all dumb. But I don't have a purist bone in my body when it comes to AV stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    It's not a bad TV. And if it was just watching movies or something I definitely wouldn't care about 120hz, but it's just so much better for gaming.

    I'm not a purist, like I said I'm rocking a TCL which is low end, but I've come to appreciate some level of specs I can't go back on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    People dont go read an article then frantically look for the same article on another website before sharing it

    i suggest, the link posted on lemmy, is translated to archive.ph, if one is available. But that requires work ...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Crazy. I have a Sony XBR 46” lcd that’s almost 20 years old. It still looks great for what it is (1080p and all). It was a top of the line tv back in the day that’s held its own for a very long time. It’s sad to see great companies/products fail.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    Yes, but about 5 years or so ago sony started cheaping out on quality. You used to pay more for a Sony but the TV was better and more reliable than other brands. As of late, they still charged more, but they were just as likely to break or have problems than any other cheaper TV.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    20 years ago is when LCD’s got good enough compared to CRTs and plasma.

    Not as good but I still have my $1k 40” Sony tv. It’s good enough I don’t think about how much better my OLED is when watching it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    That's a shame. I've had very good experiences with Sony upper mid range/lower high end TVs. Their image processing is second to none IMO, they seem to use more powerful CPUs than a lot of other android TV makers, and their use of AndroidTV means I can trivially customise my TV in a way that I can't with lots of other brands (strip out ads, basically).

    Shit, my oldest daughter moved into a flat with friends when she started uni not long ago, and took my old 2007 42" 1080p Bravia that I bought all those years ago. She hadn't even been born yet, and it still looks shockingly good.

    This is sad news.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 9 months ago

    The verge is a garbage paywall site now

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago* (14 children)

    Sony’s modern OLEDs are sick. There are a few between my family, and they have the best processing I’ve seen, they decode massive bluray rips no problem, and native options for a clean ad-free UI.

    Why TF aren’t people buying them?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (4 children)

    For me, for my use case it's primarily because of the size TV I want. Mine is going in the basement on a wall where I want the biggest TV I can afford. That means I could get an 83" screen in OLED or a 98-100" QLED. 15" difference is pretty dramatic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (3 children)

    Oh man, you're missing out on OLED in a basement though. It's so fantastic for dimly lit evironments that I'd take the smaller size any day, and just sit a little closer. LCDs, on the other hand, look pretty terrible in a really dark room.

    The only thing that would make me pause is if you're trying to squeeze a big family around the TV. In that case, it would make sense to get a bigger one, so everyone can sit farther back without compromised viewing angles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    in our case the primary seating position is about 13 ft from the screen making the larger screen a little more important due to the layout. The couch is aligned with the side speakers where they can be and that's where the seating is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    Yep, I didn't get my dedicated room, it just didn't work out but I'm maximizing the space I have to work with.

    TV is supposed to be delivered/installed today, hoping that goes smooth. Not something I would normally do, but these things are gigantic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -10 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    TV

    2026

    Honestly, don't remember the last time I watched TV

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Do you think the only thing TVs are used for is watching traditional terrestrial TV? Lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 9 months ago* (2 children)

    It's the main purpose of them, yes. Define TV to me. I don't see the point of paying for decoders, smart TV and bunch of other things I'll never use, much smarter decision is to buy a monitor which focuses on image quality and performance, far more suitable for consoles, Roku, etc.

    Commenter above low-key described that OLED as a monitor more than a TV

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (1 child)

    TVs are fantastic monitors.

    It sounds reasonable to not want to pay for basically a small computer inside the TV.

    But in practice, its not that expensive of a component. And TV volumes are so high that they're bigger and cheaper and higher quality than an equivalently priced monitor, anyway.

    Hence, while I'm fine with the monitors I have, I'm never buying a "monitor" again. It just makes no financial sense when I can get a 40" 4K TV with 120hz VRR instead, that happens to work fantastically as a streaming box too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 8 points 9 months ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago

    The worst thing about ‘smart TVs’ is that they advertise so many ‘cool’ features but most of them have less performant processors and less ram than my 2019 budget galaxy a series phone, and that’s very telling, you can’t even use their dog shit built in web browsers since everything becomes outdated after like a week, and the performance is so bad that the expensive Hisense tv my dad bought back in 2020 can’t even load Google properly.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 9 months ago

    TCL TVs are fine for the price, but you use a TV with more processing power than whatever hamster wheel TCL uses and you get real lusty real fast. Painfully slow, unresponsive UI.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    Its funny because all these grand Japanese OEMs like Sony and Panasonic got undercut by Korean rivals like LG and Samsung in the 2000s, which forced Sony to move further into exclusively high priced devices and for many other OEMs to leave the US or global market.

    Now TCL and HiSense are undercutting the grand Korean OEMs, which is slowly forcing them out of the low-middle end market.

    I upgraded from a 20+ year old Phillips LCD to TCL's QM8K, and the display technology for being a QLED panel is astounding. It looks 95% like a high quality OLED for a fraction of the cost.

    Only downside is Google TV (Junk Android that you have to debloat a bit) and for some reason the TV can't passthrough Dolby Atmos from app players like Kodi, even though it can do DTS-X just fine. I'm pretty sure the second issue is just a software bug, but TCL has been taking ages to respond. Pass through from an external source works perfectly fine though.

    If you're in the market, I highly recommend seeing it in person at a hardware/electronics store. The side by side comparison is insane.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    I remember when Sony was THE brand, not? Meh

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    It's like when IBM left its PC manufacturing to Lenovo. And, probably a ton of other examples I've never paid any attention to.

    It's starting to feel like only old people look at a screen bigger than six inches. That, combined with displays becoming a commodity item, leads to the manufacturing being abandoned to commodity manufacturers. If Sony could bring anything of value that would justify the cost of holding on to this, they would. Sony's name hasn't been synonymous with quality for decades now, that's partly their own doing through poor choices, but also the quality of cheap displays is perfectly adequate for most people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    I went from Sony, Samsung, and LG to now buying TCL. At under $1000 for a 65", they're the best option.

    Anything under $1500 I'd bet on TCL. Keep in mind TCL manufacturers a great chunk of the worlds LCDs that aren't just for TCL. Pretty sure they bought LGs LCD plants. Maybe Samsung too.

    Their TVs have a lot of dimming zones. Sony I don't think makes LCDs or OLED panels themselves. At least one line of their TVs use TCL panels already. They buy from others

    Here's a review for the model that came out last year. At this point where's it's regularly on "sale" for $1000. TVs are MSRP for like half a year and then the discounts always seem to me to be happening

    https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/tcl/qm8k

    1,680 dimming zones in the 65" model and from what I've read, the global models are usually one year behind China. So in 2025 China had TCL TVs with even more dimming zones. 8 years ago sub $1000 65" with array LED backlight zones were like 100-200 zones. OLED were incredibly better and would kill off LCDs when prices came down. The density of dimming zones I think progressed faster than people expected

    So TCL has solid image processing while Sony has great image processing but not so much better for me to think it's worth it. Same with the $1000-2000 mini-led backlit LCDs vs OLED. Yes OLED looks better. Don't feel like it's large enough for me to go much higher than a $1000 TV. That's a reality for home theater brands today. TVs, speakers, receivers/amplifiers, headphones, mics, etc - there's good stuff at low prices.

    Everyone's competing on value now. There used to always be rumors about a Apple TV (actual TV) and Apple EVs. Never hear about rumors for those anymore. Don't think the quality difference possibility and profit margins exist to make those appealing anymore for Apple. Sony like Apple is increasingly a services/media company.

    Samsung - Tizen sucks. I don't recall how LG and WebOS looks, but to me Tizen is leagues above Android and Roku in making your TV into a loud billboard. At least Android you can install a different launcher.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Dammit. I’ve had an LG plasma for the last 15, and it looks like I’ll have to get that Sony well before I’m ready for it.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    The only negative thing about my TCL tv is that it's running Google tv launcher. I replaced that with Projectivy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago*

    Where I live, it's mostly the Korean brands on top and middle-tier, but for the working class they have an insane number of choices from Chinese makers, despite the quality.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    So… on the customer market only PlayStation needs to flop and Sony is gone forever

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    Those long lists are mostly full of everything but consumer electronics: semiconductors, gaming studios, movie studios, TV networks, music labels... heck even real estate is on there. So they kinda have a point when it comes to consumer electronics (which is what I think they meant with "customer market").

    The current Sony has little to do with the one from the 80s, 90s or even early 2000s... In addition to the PlayStation they are strong in imaging (photo and video cameras) I think, but little else, and those products no longer have mass appeal (they are getting high-end- and pro-focused). Vaio, Xperia, Bravia, Walkman... gone or on life support. Browse their site and there's a handful of products left, as good as they might be (which I don't know).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›