top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 190 points 1 year ago (20 children)

A confounding issue is the apps themselves have gotten worse over time. Like, old okcupid you could search. You could type in like "final fantasy" or "the Mets" and find people who liked those things enough to put them on their profile.

Now you're limited to whatever the app decides to give you. Well, the app doesn't want you to leave so that incentive doesn't line up.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 100 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    A lot of the more popular ones, okcupid included, all got bought up by Match Group and almost immediately started trending anti-consumer in their updates or removal of features. They want you paying, they don't give a shit about success.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    100%. Match group should be broken up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Close, they actively fight success. Legally obligated to, even. It’s their fiduciary responsibility to keep you using the app.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    That's not really how that works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I’d love for you to be right. Please elaborate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    “Rather than require specific outcomes–such as achieving maximum share price–fiduciary duties are largely about conduct, process, and motivation”

    You don't have a fiduciary responsibility to maximize profit, or anything like that. You have a responsibility to act in accordance to company rules and guidelines, and to act in the company's interest, not your own.

    There is no requirement to burn to company down to maximize short-term profits, like some people think. That's usually at the expense of long-term profits anyway, so it could be better for profits to do something better for the customer.

    You're only required to act "ethically" and keep the company's interests above your own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    If the company has a goal to make more money every year, then you can justify a lot of actions in that pursuit. And once they have a monopoly you kinda don't have many options, so they can push more.

    Saying they have a responsibility to keep you on the app may sound silly, but app user churn is most likely measured and has some goal around it. And if a goal is set around that churn then they very much have an obligation to keep you on there as long as possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    There's the alternative of trying to obtain more users, or also to retain users by being a better service (although it has to appeal to a different demographic than those trying to leave for this though).

    They have a pretty universally bad name now, so obtaining new users only gets harder, and a lot of people leave even without finding a long term match because the service is shit. They can optimize for these factors without burning the place down.

    They have no requirement to grow year over year either. That has nothing to do with fiduciary responsibility. It just keeps stock value growing. Prioritizing long term health at the expense of short term gains is perfectly fine a legal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    OkCupid used to actually work rather well at finding compatible people who were actually honest about what they were looking for.

    Then it got bigger, got acquired, and the matching model of the whole industry was intentionally modified to be more monetizable, and to keep giving matches that are close, but not close enough to be truely long term compatible.

    You aren't using the app/website anymore if it works and gets you a successful long term match.

    You are using the app for a longer time if you keep getting close but just missing the mark.

    ...

    Do people not think their dating app is tracking... how many matches and text exchanges they have?

    How much time elapses between you matching, chatting, leaving... and then going back to swiping?

    And then multidimensional matrix comparing that to every other definable variable about you?

    Including whether or not you say you're looking for something long term, or serious... but you actually keep cycling through people?

    These algos, these things... they know exactly to what extent you lie to yourself and others, and they weaponize that to keep people in a sort of optimal (for the app, not you), constant disappointment loop.

    ...

    Everything digital is now way beyond 'if its free, you are the product'.

    The model is now entirely attention, addiction based, and manipulating your emotions in as close to real time as possible is absolutely integral to all this.

    People forget that over a decade ago, Zuckerberg said his dream was to be able to predict with high accuracy what any given Facebook user would post next.

    Nearly a decade ago, Netflix CEO or some such stated 'our primary competitor is sleep'.

    People largely do not realize the extent to which these corpo fucks have been running highly precise and targeted manipulation of every aspect of human behavior... all to drive goddamn ad revenue and market share, ie, entrench themselves as institutions the modern world is no longer imaginable without.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm just confused as to how there isn't a dating app that is better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    short answer:

    Dating Apps/Sites are basically social media sites, they only really work via the network effect, by being so huge that they necessitate significant financial investment.

    ...

    long answer:

    A dating app is only broadly, mass appeal successful if it can scale to have a wide selection of people, users, ideally, in as many places as possible.

    This requires a large amount of servers.

    A large amount of servers requires a large amount of money.

    A large amount of money requires investors.

    Investors require as much profit as possible.

    ...

    A conventional dating site/app, as we think of the big ones today... its a social media platform.

    Just with a different, more constrained feature set, a different UI... but roughly similar levels of network infrastructure and overhead.

    ...

    You could actually make a reasonable argument for running a non profit, or ... some kind of collectively owned and operated dating service that is restricted to say a city or small region, or maybe a neighborhood in a larger city.

    (Indeed, many of the older ones kind of began this way, pitched more like a ... a club that you join and pay membership dues for, thats how they were marketed in the late 90s / early 00s... though these of course were largely actually privately owned, but the marketing angle was that of 'exclusive community')

    The technicals of exactly how to do that, legally and financially, might end up being impractical though... and if the government is directly involved, well... 10, 20 years ago I would say thats a rather serious privacy problem, but at least in the US right now, I am sure Tinder will sell your info to a data broker who sells it to the FBI if they want to investigate you, so.... yeah.

    The other obvious problem is that the best dating app is the one you use the least... so... some kind of unconventional payment structure would have to be figured out, to counteract this massive and glaring incentive conflict between app and user.

    Maybe high upfront fixed costs to the user, but if you don't find a good match after a year, 75% gets refunded to you?

    Not sure. Could be legal nightmare.

    ...

    Other than that, privately owned and operated dating communities can work fairly well without huge server overhead... if they are precisely targeted at a pretty specific kind of people, be it a religion, or a bdsm community, or a specific ethnicity, who knows... those can at least theoretically work at a larger geographic scale, because that kind of scale doesn't also massively ramp up user count.

    But there's nothing stopping them from being bought out if they get too big.

    ...

    Bonus!

    Job application / recruiting sites are also basically dating apps/sites.

    Its just person vs job instead of person vs person.

    Broadly, guys on dating sites have been flooding women with match requests for years now, women have been overwhelmed by the volume and believe they can be very picky.

    Now replace 'guys' with 'job seekers', 'match requests' with 'applications' and 'women' with 'companies'.

    Both scenarios result in wasteful amounts of energy going into 'match-making', which is horrendously inefficient.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Wow, that's an incredibly insightful answer. I suppose I never considered the scale of it. Most are fairly bare bones, but you are right, there are so many users and repeat users that it would scale very poorly.

    You're also right on the social media part of it. There kindof needs to be secondary engagement thing to attract and support the community.

    Always felt that dating apps were a little too ?accesible? That is to say that they are exceedingly easily flooded by no or low effort profiles, abandoned and duplicate profiles. Especially by desperate men who are completely undiscerning and undereducated (consent, sex, sexuality, etc...).

    I feel like there should be engagement/social/education tiers that grant more access to more features. Like literally give points if you can pass tests on consent, relationships, kink, whatever. Get social points from good engagement and behavior. These don't show your profile more or less, but like if the medium has NSFW features, forums, criteria/location filtering it gives access to them based on community trust and such. Maybe offer a paid shortcut, but have that declared on their profile somehow.

    Could be nice. But I'd also probably have the swiping style app be accessory to a more traditional forum.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I feel like there should be engagement/social/education tiers that grant more access to more features. Like literally give points if you can pass tests on consent, relationships, kink, whatever. Get social points from good engagement and behavior. These don't show your profile more or less, but like if the medium has NSFW features, forums, criteria/location filtering it gives access to them based on community trust and such. Maybe offer a paid shortcut, but have that declared on their profile somehow.

    I like this line of thinking.

    I more or less used to use OkCupid in this way... it has so many questions you can answer that basicsally, if you have your own set of hard red flags... just look through their answers to questions.

    ...

    You could theorerically do a paid shortcut for some things, but not others.

    ...

    With my gamer brain, the first thing that comes to mind is pay to win games:

    You can design a game such that... you can reasonably progress through the game, get good items, level up reasonably quickly... without having to spend any more real world money.

    Warframe is arguably a good example of this.

    You can just play a fleshed out and enjoyable game and progress at a reasonable rate without spending any real world money, everything in the game is obtainable without more money if you're good at the game... but if you just have cash to burn, you csn just outright buy some high level gear, basically, to say, join up with some friends who've been playing for a long time, without playing for 50 or 100 hours to be on their level.

    ...

    But you can also make it just an absolutely hellish slog to progress through the game, such that you finally get tired of grinding and have that 'fuck it!' moment, and just pay to progress... and then you at first find those payments are rather cheap actually... but if you keep playing, the actual money costs ramp up faster and faster, alongside your time devoted to the game, so now you've got sunk cost and your brain sunk cost fallacy's you into just still playing and spending.

    This is pretty much how WarThunder is designed.

    ...

    But uh yeah, ramble ramble... I like your basic framework here, but again the problem with monetization is thag is has to be reasonable and apparent to everyone, your idea of badges that show everyone this is I think good.

    I am just very worried that if this whole app is privately owned... it will inevitably enshittify and subvert itseld to being an evil money draining skinner box as it attracts more investors or gets new owners or goes public or whatever.

    ...

    EDIT:

    oh right

    Wow, that's an incredibly insightful answer.

    Thank you! =D

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Fetlife is like that too. “Find people with the same interests as you!”… select an interest: 120K people! Okay, let me filter by location? No. Filter by age? No. Filter by sex? Guess what, also No. So instead you have to hand scroll through all the entries. I don’t want to spend a lot of time connecting with someone with a common interest if they’re on the other side of the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago

    oh honey...

  • source
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I think we should make dating apps even worse, and just let humanity die out naturally.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I'm always surprised to hear people unimpressed with others on dating apps. A couple of my friends have shared their "feeds" and I was struck by how many good-looking people are out there. But they would swipe away from just the smallest turn-offs becoming deal breakers. Like if I saw these people in real life, I would think of them as average looking at worst, many being remarkably attractive. This is in the 20s to mid 30s range like the tweet. I definitely understand deciding you're incompatible based on politics or religion or culture but most of the time it would be for minor quirks. It felt like they were spoiled for choice in my eyes.

    But then again, they're in serious long term relationships with conventionally attractive and supportive partners now so maybe being picky pays off. At the time, their reluctance to settle was a very frustrating experience for them.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Reluctant to settle, spoiled for choice, great ways of describing the situation.

    the apparently-bottomless firehose of faces that makes you desensitized, the anonymous dismissal of them makes you callous.

    The apps are just another dopamine slot machine, so the companies don't care and in fact would rather keep people in their app.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    'Look at all these people that think I'm pretty, who I could have if I wanted to.''

    It's the mirror from Snow White, but it lies better the more you pay it, the more time you spend staring at it.

    Skinner box.

    Wire the rat up to stimulate its pleasure receptors if it pushes button.

    Rat will push button untill it dies of dehydration.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Any dating app that was any good at its stated aim wouldn't be able to make enough money to survive.

    By definition dating apps don't want you to meet a partner, they want you addicted to swiping and tapping and almost finding a partner. If you hook up a few times along the way then that's just a secondary benefit and keeps that carrot dangling in front of you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, if you actually find someone app usage will drop for at least some people, maybe even most people. The more exclusive some/many folks are the less they'll open the app. Up to finding someone(s) that fully satisfy them for at least a while, and for that while that user may even be completely off the app. Maybe they even delete it. Certainly they won't compulsively be using it the same way they are when they are trying to connect.

    For many (not all) users, successfully finding connections is detrimental to engagement, advertising, active user stats, etc. The incentives for the company are not geared towards helping users connect, and are geared towards always having users continually trying to connect.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 75 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    Looking forward to getting back on dating apps at 38

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Look, I did it at 47. Take the time to make a good profile, ask for help on pics and be an authentic you. It’s a mess out there, for those that never try.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    ask for help on pics

    I would like to second this point, especially if you're not practiced at taking selfies. I've seen some fine looking men IRL whose profile pictures looked like potato.

    It doesn't have to be this way. People like to help, and most would be happy to see you meet someone special. Might as well ask.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    I may or may not be one of these people that suck at selfies. But damn if my profile pics weren’t top amateur talent from my sister. I may not have had dating life partner success(yet), but I’ve had a good number of dates that went some distance.

    I repeat for those not listening: Effort pays off.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Thirded. People like to think that their match will be deep enough to look past something superficial like a bad photo, but that's not how most of us work. People see a decent photo and then check the rest.

    You don't have to be a model or movie star. Good lighting. Clothes that fit. A background that's not, like, a dingy bathroom or your car.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    The pics part is weird because it's like... I'm supposed to have other people's photos of me? I don't have photos of me. Why would I take a photo of the same thing I see every morning like I'm just trying to say hello to the world, like I'm an actually happy, well-adjusted person who wants to update all of his friends on his day.... oh, that's, ok. I get it now. That's why.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    17 years younger than me is 23, I cannot image that amount of energy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I have serious questions about a 23-year-old that wanted anything to do with me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • A few months back there was some post about female inmates looking for pen pals. I remember one profile describing herself as submissive and looking for a daddy. I did some research and saw she was in the slammer for diddling with a 12 year old girl. Not sure if that leaves many questions open.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They have questions too. Like what level of life insurance do you have? Are beneficiaries easy to add? And what kind of food is your favorite?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (32 children)

    Millennial here. Have recently dabbled with the apps. Honestly the guys I was shown were not objectively bad looking. Many of them were pretty attractive. But not my type at all. My interests were books and video games and nerdy sweetness…and it kept recommending me muscle gym divorced military dads. So I gave up.

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] [S] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I don't blame you. The algorithm is gonna force you to look at what people your demographic like despite whatever input you give it. At least it seems this way with how algorithms in general seem to work on social media. The amount of dick pill ads I get is way to high.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Yeah at first it is. The algorithm learns about you over time and it gets a little better with regular use. It still has a bit of a blind spot around nerd/geek culture.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Literally fuck algorithms. Anything that has one is dead to me, if at all possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Yes, they literally are fuck algorithms. 🤣

    Not a fan of how corporations make them work myself but understanding a little about them can make things like this a little less frustrating.

    I would argue that the existence of an algorithm isn't inherently evil, they just ruin things when they're designed to maximize profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Is it really in the apps interest to find your perfect partner or just ones that bring you back to the app again and again?

    I'm not convinced they're looking out for your best interests.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It may be more profitable to have regular success stories getting churned. The algo looks out for the best interests of the company's profit. Sometimes things line up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    A fair point, so it's in its favour to help maybe a tiny percentage find a tiny bit of success and then promote that success while everyone else pays.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Most likely, this is because the nerds who know how to present themselves have already gotten nabbed by some girl. Nerds who are unable to present themselves well are relegated to the bottom of the pile, since nearly all women will swipe left on them. Jacked, divorced military dads are at least jacked, which is something many women find appealing, so they end up higher on the stack.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, I think you make a great point here. Most of my gamer friends are couples with children. Unfortunately, I have no interest in jacked dudes at all, but I think most people probably do lean into that on dating sites. I figure at this point and age if I meet someone, great. If not, I’ll be fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Which app? Cause I can't find the nerdy girls.

    The algorithm just pushes all these women who are wanting someone who will house them and take them on worldly vacations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I tried bumble and hinge, got the ick, and gave up. Yeah, I’ve heard people saying something similar; going on about women looking to be housed. It’s such a huge turnoff and it makes me consider their financial insecurity, to be honest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Most people seem to accept living on debt or handouts. It's strange. I see everyone around me (both sexes) acting the same. So it's not even a dating app issue, I think it's a people issue. Offer nothing and expect everything in return. Maybe it's an American thing?

    I don't want to be grouped into incel mentality, but is there a dating app to meet people from another country?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I don’t know, it could be your immediate environment. I certainly noticed this behavior in some friend groups, but not others. I don’t think you need to go that far to avoid the behavior. Just be vigilant and expect reciprocity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    What kind of nerd stuff? You like Pokemon? 3D printers? D&D?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    After the third/fourth gen of Pokémon I kinda lost interest. Whenever it was they started being jet skis.

    Add tower defense and sim games to the list though. DnD based games, although I’ve played tabletop from time to time, just too much of an introvert to join a random group.

    Anyways, when you’re swiping in my age range there aren’t a lot of folks with these interests in my area. Maybe I’m too old and get shown whatever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I think a lot of nerdy people need to just start going outside and doing stuff. Like, if you enjoy DND roll up to the local hobby store and start hanging out, even if you arent playing.

    None of this is targeted directly at you, just as good a spot as any to rant.. lol

    I think more people would be surprised that the horror stories are the minority. At my local game story I go to a painting night once a month mostly to hang out and chat. There are a pretty even split of women/men.

    Point is I think this a safe spot to make friends and making friends is the only way to get into a relationship you'll actually enjoy.

    I met my girlfriend doing Star wars rp. My friend met his girl playing magic l. All my single friends have something in common. They don't make time for their hobbies and don't hang out with like minded people in that space.

    Just a side note I'm not saying that everyone should go harass people at their FLGS or use it as a dating service, but rather, going out and hanging out with like minded people opens up a lot of options that aren't on dating apps.

    I'm pretty introverted too but when people are into whatever my hyper focus is it's much easier to open up. Go out there! Be uncomfortable! Not a cure all but it's something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    For me, the biggest impediment is really having to work a full time job. And being in my late 30s, a lot of these activities are described to be for 20-30s in the meetups app. I agree though, I’ve met some nice people at gaming stores when I was younger and had the energy. So this is good advice.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Let's see, I'm in an entire server where people your age are playing pokemon tabletop. Ok, it's not even funny anymore. I wanted to make a joke about how I'm single and into those things, but it really is like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I’d be interested in the server. Why are you making the joke? It’s okay to be single.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    The joke is well we are pretty much the same, but complain about not being able to find partners. Reality: because we don't want to. Lemmy users are not so different from Reddit users.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    muscle gym divorced military dads

    I know a bunch of these dudes, and most of them are into books and video games.

    Something about the RPG grind mechanic in certain video games and a typical strength/barbell progression program scratch the same itch, so people who tend to be into one are also into the other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Dating is hard for everyone in one way or another, and, speaking as one, several ways for those who look pretty dead average but have trouble socializing and really only go between home and work. I don't even feel like I'm that picky; no cigarettes, no kids, yes empathy, and a complementary flavor of weird/neurodivergence.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I am putting it out there for him. It's all circumstance and luck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Sometimes the no kids thing, can be a huge red flag, a lot of the incel / women hating types put no kids. There's a lot of them out there and they're really extreme, you might be limiting your dating pool by wanting someone who doesn't have kids but then if you're into never having kids, that's a different thing, entirely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    It's not necessarily a billboard I put up stating that I don't want kids. I made the decision long ago, partially based on my upbringing and now the current world situation, to never have children, so I checked the boxes saying I don't have, and don't want, children. That's it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    first thing I tell my gf's is I dont is don't want kids. one was of agreement and now we have been together 10 years and got all sorts of money to spend to travel and pursue expensive dreams. Plus what if I had a ugly child I'd have to hug it? (just kidding)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    I never wanted to have kids, so that makes me an incel? We've lost the plot here, that's fucking crazy, only women are allowed to be childfree now? And also I have heard if a guy likes children it's also a red flag? So I'm either a child molester or an incel? I'll take incel I guess, interesting "would you rather."

    I think you might just be wrong on this one, it's entirely possible that men too don't feel like bringing a kid into *gestures vaguely at everything.*

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›