top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 357 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (42 children)

I think other comments missed that the model is actually trans, thus making the poster ironic or the typical dumbass. And I know that she wanted to distance herself from her transness as stated in the Wikipedia article, but it's relevant to the post here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Schafer

  • source
  • hideshow 42 child comments
  • [–] 186 points 9 months ago (15 children)
  • [–] 77 points 9 months ago (11 children)

    This is a wild take lol and I sort of like it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Isn't that more or less Andrew Tate's take though?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    I don’t know, he seems like a piece of shit so I never bothered to learn much about him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Sort of. He basically said, that as a guy, being attracted to someone AFAB that was extremely masculine, "Hulk Hogan with a pussy" being the direct quote, was gayer than being attracted to someone AMAB that was extremely feminine, "Megan Fox with a dick".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Which is hilarious because dude basically homophobe'd himself into "Trans women are women and trans men are men," which is usually the exact opposite thing that homophobes do. Usually they get hung up on the gender they were assigned at birth and are terrified that they would be considered gay based on that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    This line of thinking (I know, it's a joke, I like to riff on jokes as if they're srs bsns) creates a unique scenario where I do think she's objectively beautiful, but at the same time she's not a woman because no curves

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 90 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, I debated whether I should include it but tbh I think it would've lost its shitpost-factor and turned into political slop. I decided it was more a IYKYK situation.

    That being said I appreciate it being added in the comments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Maybe it was confusing, so just in case, by "making the post ironic or the typical dumbass" I was referring to the twitter post, not you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    It’s got to be satire. Beautiful women have never stopped being in ads. Why make this comment for this specific post if it’s not satire.

    Edit:

    Richard Hanania (born August 28, 1985) is an American political scientist and right-wing online personality.[3][4] He is the founder and president of the think tank Center for the Study of Partisanship and Ideology (CSPI).[5][6][7] He has written for The Washington Post,[3] The New York Times, The Atlantic,[6] and The Economist.[4][6] He wrote The Origins of Woke and publishes his newsletter on Substack.

    Oh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Knowing absolutely nothing about the model... My first thought was that she was trans. Because the dipshits run into that all the time.

    They make no effort to actually understand anything and just live off vibes and beliefs with no factual basis whatsoever. Not doing a basic Google search to look up the model and verify before posting like an idiot is par for the course.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    Apparently the post isn't from a dipshit, it's a sarcastic post to bait dipshits. Calm your anger lol.

    Nope, was wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Isn't she the one who wanted to be cast as Princess Zelda that a surprising number of terminally online folks were super angry about because trans?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Idk, I know her from Euphoria. She seems like a fine pick for Zelda tbh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    I checked his profile so you don't have to. He's a typical dumbass

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Another person said that according to his history he was being sarcastic.

    Hmmmm......

    I'm not invested enough though, idc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Hes a racist piece of shit that was a core part of the alt rights "race realist" movment under a pen name until he got popular under his real name. Someone outted his racism and he suddenly "rejected his earlier writtings."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Definitely passes, wow! Good for her.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

    I know you meant this in a kind / supportive way so you'll probably be receptive to this: commenting on whether someone is "passing" or not is super rude in the trans community. Just say she is beautiful if you must comment on her appearance

    Edit: I usually just assume best intentions but looks like I was wrong (I don't dig through post history typically). According to those below me you'll probably just keep being a crusty fucker; be better dude wth. We have enough assholes around here and being kind is a choice we can make everyday.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 216 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 59 points 9 months ago

    MAGA hats are going to be fuming when they find out what they just retweeted.

  • source
  • [–] 45 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 35 points 9 months ago (7 children)

    Prada, 2023:

    Prada, 2022:

    Prada, 2018:

    I might have switched up 23 and 22.

    But uh... what?

    Like, I'll give you that Prada seems to consistently go for models that kinda look like aliens, with pretty big eyes and generally chiseled or striking features, they try to emphasize triangular faces and chins, strong cheekbones...

    But... are these not generally attractive women?

    ... I was going to ask what this person is smoking, but I'm guessing its meth.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    ... I was going to ask what this person is smoking, but I'm guessing its meth.

    Worse. It's OANN

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago*

    ... I once saw a guy rip a page out of a Bible, to use as rolling paper for a rollie, rolled cigarette.

    Called him 'Holy Roller', he thought it was funny.

    I'm now imagining something similar but like, with an American Flag... nylon would make for like, the worst fucking rolling paper possible, both for the manual process of trying to make the rollie, and it would just be... complete fucking poison to smoke... but... I've seen worse... uhhhhggghhh....

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 61 points 9 months ago (10 children)

    (Yes, I get the joke)

    What the hell causes people to believe there’s a large political faction that wants people in media to be unattractive? At worst, some people just get taken out of a fantasy world if the women are wearing straight bikinis for no reason, but there’s many ways to make them look sexy without attire being totally impractical.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] 45 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I quite enjoy how those who are pro senseless lewdness in advertising are often the same people who want women to cover up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago*

    Well yeah, cos they were taught a) it's a sin to get hard for anyone but your baby slave, b) the only reason your dick is hard is to fuck something and cum, c) they dont want it to happen in public so they blame the cause of their arousal for their own fucked up suppressions and d) power play - if you can undress it or fuck it it's lesser than you

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Let's take a look at plus-size models. That's a really good example.

    It makes this rift between haas/body acceptance and what's really actually healthy.

    But on the flip side, super-skinny models aren't exactly healthy, either.

    Both normalize unhealthy weight and lead to population-wide body image problems and related eating disorders. Then you get things like social media throwing rocket fuel on that fire.

    I don't see how either is "woke" though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    It's because there's a significant proportion of people whose preferences are something behind "skinny, white, conventionally feminine woman", and so when people outside of that demographic are featured in media, it freaks them out because their preferences are limited to people who fit within that narrow description, so wider diversity of people depicted in media is, to them, synonymous with a push for unattractive people in media.

    That in and of itself isn't a problem — they have every right to their own preferences, and I have no interests in trying to convince them of anything. The problem is because they have attached themselves to the idea that their personal preferences are the objective standard. So when they see more diversity in media, and others thirsting for people they would consider to be objectively unattractive, this destabilises the idea that their preferences are The Truth. This means that, rather than just accepting that people like what they like, they contort themselves into believing that this is all a big conspiracy to try to push objectively unattractive people into media. Framing things like that means they end up seeing this as something that is entirely a political push to erode all foundations of society as part of some Woke ploy. They feel threatened and genuinely scared that there will be a future where there is literally no-one who they find attractive represented in media. Which is to say that someone who is accustomed to being the boot distrusts people who want there to be no boot, because surely they must be lying so that they can seize power and be the boot and crush everyone else.

    At the heart of this is a zero-sum way of thinking of the world. They have deeply internalised that if one group in society gains rights, or power of any sort, then it must come at the cost of someone else. Some of them occasionally show awareness of the moral awfulness of them using their privilege to oppress others in society, and they briefly have moments where they understand that if the oppressed wished to take our retribution against them, we would be justified. However, they are incapable (or unwilling) to actually reckon with all the cognitive dissonance they've built up, and so their fear causes them to become ever more rigid in their worldview.

    I find it fascinating, really. I am a fat, queer punk, and my existence is viscerally horrifying to them, because I am the epitome of so much of what they hate, and it breaks their brains to imagine that someone could find me attractive (tbh, it still sort of breaks my brain a bit too, but I'm getting there with improving my confidence). They genuinely believe that THE WOKE LEFT want everyone in media to look like me, even though that would be the opposite of the diversity we actually want.

    They don't believe us when we say this though. Their zero sum thinking combined with their willful inability to acknowledge that their own preferences are as subjective as anyone's means they don't believe us when we say this though, and that this is all part of our dastardly plot to seize absolute power for ourselves and make them be the oppressed ones.

    It's quite sad for them in the end. I've found that a huge part of what has allowed me to become more confident in myself has been acknowledging and embracing all the non conventional things I find attractive in other people. For instance, I firmly believe that the most beautiful point on basically any human body is the point where the curvature of the calf turns from being convex to concave. And because I don't feel the need to convince other people of this, I can just let myself like what I like and be free to bite my partners' calves. Even if their tastes do genuinely align with what is considered to be this narrow notion of "conventionally attractive", I can't imagine they feel very free to actually enjoy their own desires and their own bodily potential

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    She looks like she's afraid of being alone with the person taking her picture. Because of the implications.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Tbf I think Prada just has that style where the model is meant to look a bit uncomfortable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    Woke is when woman not beautiful. Noted.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    "Woke" is when they're mad about how things are or are now not. "Woke" is anything and nothing, which makes it usable for everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Unironically, that is as consistent with the GOP's usage of the word as anything else. Because the youths say "6 7" and they refuse to understand it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I agree, but maybe we underestimate the youth, and we are still the melders of their understanding... Thus it may be best to embrace the abnormalities and discuss what we feel pertinent. If the heart of socialism is at understanding the value of people and treating them properly... Tearing them down for making jokes in a time of terror gets us no where. So I figure, support; joke. And be there. If one asks, answer. Don't preach. Enlighten don't breach. The world's fucked... But if my last day is to make anothers day better, that may be all I can do

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Meanwhile, the ad companies do not care.

    The right wants to claim these companies are on their side. The companies aren't on their side, they're not on anybody's side. If they think they can generate more sales with a fat, black model in a bikini, they'll do it. If it's a thin trans model, they'll do that. If it's a slim blonde with big tits and a swastika tattoo, they'll do that instead. Whatever moves product.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    It seems to me that they want people’s attention on the fabricated culture war instead of focusing on actual policies and real solution

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Man, just wait until he figures it out. He’ll cum twice as hard.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    Can someone smarter than me explain why the world is full off fucked up individuals, like why is it so rare to find an actual decent human being, or is it that the worst of us are the loudest and the so you notice those more

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago

    Decades of the wealth class pushing for privatization of essential services such as education by slashing budgets of public services.

    Those individuals also just so happen to have stake in those private entities.

    The result is a populace who isn’t educated enough to know that they’re trapped in an endless grift.

    And the stupider someone is, the more emotionally reactive they are. So we’ve got the people pushing the culture war shit who know that they’re full of shit, and the hapless idiots that pass along the message thanks to being tricked into being scared of their fellow man for inane reasons.

    Toss in organized religion, and baby you got an ignorance stew brewin!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 9 months ago

    More imagined victimhood

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    Well she IS beautiful.

    But yeah what a fuckwhit.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    Is being praised by MAGA a "they use my photos to spread bullshit rhetoric" insult to trans people, or is it more of an "even they say I am valid" double-compliment?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    How old is the girl in the picture?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago

    Fucking Nazis.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›